Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Security Network IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System comparison

IBM and Trellix are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. IBM is ranked #25, while Trellix is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.8. IBM holds a 0.8% mindshare in ID, compared to Trellix’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
IBM Security Network IPS
Read 4 IBM Security Network IPS reviews
  • 314 Views
  • 254 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
Trellix Intrusion Preventio...
Read 15 Trellix Intrusion Prevention System reviews
  • 1,067 Views
  • 928 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

IBM Security Network IPS and Trellix Intrusion Prevention System are competing products in the network security landscape. IBM is favored for its pricing and support, whereas Trellix stands out with superior features for those ready to invest more.

Features: IBM Security Network IPS provides robust threat detection, focuses on stability, and integrates seamlessly with transaction systems. Its in-line blocking feature offers intelligent malicious traffic detection and prevention. The XGS series supports extensive traffic throughput. Trellix excels with advanced machine learning, real-time threat intelligence, and automated signature updates. It efficiently handles DDoS attacks and offers robust network traffic inspection capabilities.

Room for Improvement: IBM Security Network IPS could enhance its machine learning capabilities, expand threat intelligence integration, and improve user interface customization. The XGS series would benefit from greater compatibility with third-party systems. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System might streamline its setup process, enhance its customer support response time, and offer more competitive pricing for small businesses. It could also benefit from simplifying its advanced feature set for easier adoption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Security Network IPS features a straightforward deployment process with responsive customer support, making integration with existing systems easier. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System, while offering comprehensive onboarding assistance, involves more complex deployment requiring extended setup time and expertise. Its support ensures thorough guidance but may need improvements in response efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Security Network IPS offers competitive initial pricing appealing to budget-conscious buyers, providing quick ROI with consistent security measures. Its cost-effectiveness contrasts with Trellix, which generally demands a higher initial investment due to advanced features, offering substantial long-term ROI through comprehensive threat protection. Each product caters to different financial strategies.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Security Network IPS vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM Security Network IPS vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 866,956 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Security Network IPS
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
25th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Intrusion Preventio...
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
12th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of IBM Security Network IPS is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System is 3.5%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System3.5%
IBM Security Network IPS0.8%
Other95.7%
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
 

Featured Reviews

Jacob_Koithra - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly and has a good blocking feature but is quite expensive
Defining the new security rules and policies sometimes becomes a challenge. Integration with other platforms becomes a challenge as well. I'd like to see more integration with other tools and technologies. XGS 7100 has an end of support for the 30th of December 2022. Many are losing support. All the products of the XGS, including XGS 3100, 4100, 5100, and 7100, support is ending in December 2022. We need to know what is the plan post that? Do we need to spend money on them? Will that be extended? There has been no communication on the website either. It's an expensive device.
Read full review
Daniel_Martins - PeerSpot reviewer
Decade of experience empowers seamless problem resolution and support
I haven't seen threat intelligence and machine learning for predictive threat analysis in the Trellix Intrusion Prevention System yet. For Trellix IPS, AI improvements are an area where it can improve. It's a significant feature. Regarding the Trellix Intrusion Prevention System's flexibility for catering to our organization's specific infrastructure requirements, we have only on-premises and virtual appliances, but it's acceptable. The access and platform could potentially integrate with SaaS. Similar to when you put the EPO in mode integration with SaaS, you can connect with a local credential and with an X Console credential. Another possibility would be to connect with an integration login with the X Console. We have this with EPO on-premise, but with IPS, we don't have it.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The initial setup is simple."
"The most valuable feature is its simplicity."
"The threat intelligence updates are very accurate."
"Great monitoring feature."
"There's a good dashboard you can drill down into. It helps you easily locate intrusions and the source of attacks."
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is a good product for dealing with DDoS attacks and for the inspection of network traffic."
"It has a lot of functions, such as firewall. We are administrators, and we create some rules to protect our network. We also monitor the traffic in and out and have disk encryption on-premises. When we detect malware, we scan for the virus on the PC. We can then delete or block the malware."
"McAfee NSP is much more stable than Cisco."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The ability to centrally manage all the IPS sensors, track the different security events generated by it, and customize the different policies, depending on their location."
More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System pros
 

Cons

"I'd like to see more integration with other tools and technologies."
"In the future, I would like to see a hybrid option so that we can work both on-premises and in the cloud."
"Some of the documentation is not as straightforward as it could be."
"The management component could be simplified."
"Integration with Global Thereat Intelligence could be better. Also, I think management solutions are end of life now at McAfee. Network threat analyzer may be used for endpoint quarantines. Integration between these sides, as well as endpoint APO, will help you quarantine the risky endpoints."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"The management console needs to be less complex and easier to navigate."
"The pricing could be improved."
"The technical support must be improved."
"The platform’s GUI could be the latest."
More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of operations is very low."
"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten."
"The tool is competitively priced."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
866,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about McAfee Network Security Platform?
The threat intelligence updates are very accurate.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Network Security Platform?
The tool is competitively priced. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with McAfee Network Security Platform?
I haven't seen threat intelligence and machine learning for predictive threat analysis in the Trellix Intrusion Prevention System yet. For Trellix IPS, AI improvements are an area where it can impr...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

ExtremeCloud IQ vs IBM Security Network IPS Logo
ExtremeCloud IQ vs IBM Security Network IPS
Compared 100% of the time
More IBM Security Network IPS Competitors
Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 32% of the time
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 20% of the time
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 18% of the time
Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 13% of the time
Check Point IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Check Point IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 9% of the time
More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
August 2025
IBM Security Network IPS reportDownload IBM Security Network IPS product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
August 2025
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System reportDownload Trellix Intrusion Prevention System product report
 

Also Known As

Security Network Intrusion Prevention System, IBM Security Network Protection, XGS, GX
McAfee Network Security Platform, McAfee NSP, IntruShield Network Intrusion Prevention System, IntruShield Network IPS
 

Overview

IBM Security Network Intrusion Prevention System appliances are designed to stop constantly evolving threats before they impact your business. This means providing both high levels of protection and performance, while lowering the overall cost and complexity associated with deploying and managing a large number of point solutions.
IBM

Block More Intrusions
Stop new and unknown attacks with signature-based and signature-less intrusion prevention systems. Signature-less intrusion detection finds malicious network traffic and stops attacks where no signatures exist.

Unify Virtual and Physical Security
Support network virtualization across private and public cloud platforms to scale security and evolve with changing IT dynamics.

Maximize Security and Performance
Scale hardware performance to speeds up to 100 Gbps and leverage data from multiple products.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

Equifax, Christian Hospital Centre
Desjardins Group, HollyFrontier, Nubia, Agbar, WNS Global Services, INAIL, Universidad de Las Américas Puebla (UDLAP), Cook County, China Pacific Insurance, Bank Central Asia, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, City of Chicago, Macquarie Telecom, Sutherland Global Services, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, United Automotive Electronic Systems
Buyer's Guide
IBM Security Network IPS vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
September 2025
Free Report: IBM Security Network IPS vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Network IPS vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
866,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM Security Network IPS vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System report.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.