• Home
  • IBM SAN32B-E4 vs. IBM SAN768B

IBM SAN32B-E4 vs IBM SAN768B comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo

IBM SAN32B-E4

23 views|17 comparisons
IBM Logo

IBM SAN768B

18 views|11 comparisons
Ranking
11th
out of 15 in Enterprise SAN
Views
23
Comparisons
17
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
14th
out of 15 in Enterprise SAN
Views
18
Comparisons
11
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
SAN32B-E4
SAN768B
Learn More
IBM
IBM
Overview
The IBM System Storage SAN32B-E4 is designed to deliver fabric-based encryption services, providing up to 96 Gbps of encryption processing for disk and 48 Gbps of compression and encryption processing for tape.
IBM System Storage SAN768B fabric backbones is a Fibre Channel switching infrastructure offerings that provide the foundation for reliable, scalable, high-performance storage. The System Storage SAN b-type family switch leverages Gen 5 Fibre Channel and Fabric Vision technology to deliver long-term solutions for mission-critical applications that require secure, high-performance, low-latency storage networks.
Sample Customers
Danieli & C. Officine Meccaniche S.p.A., L'Or_al S.A., Vaasan Oy, IBM Systems and Technology Group, Odin
Einstein Healthcare, Hansgrohe SE, Yaap Digital Services

IBM SAN32B-E4 is ranked 11th in Enterprise SAN while IBM SAN768B is ranked 14th in Enterprise SAN. IBM SAN32B-E4 is rated 0.0, while IBM SAN768B is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM SAN32B-E4 is most compared with , whereas IBM SAN768B is most compared with .

See our list of best Enterprise SAN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise SAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.