IBM InfoSphere Optim vs Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials comparison

IBM and Redgate are both solutions in the Database Development and Management category. IBM is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.0, while Redgate is ranked #9. IBM holds a 2.6% mindshare in DDM, compared to Redgate’s 6.0% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Redgate users who would recommend it.

IBM InfoSphere Optim

Read 4 IBM InfoSphere Optim reviews

545 Views
223 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essent...

Read 2 Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials reviews

1,151 Views
464 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM InfoSphere Optim

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essent...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

IBM InfoSphere Optim and Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials compete in the data management and database development sphere. InfoSphere Optim has the upper hand in scalability and compliance, while Redgate Toolbelt Essentials excels in ease of use and development tools.

Features: IBM InfoSphere Optim provides data privacy, test data management, and archiving, enhancing data governance and compliance in complex environments. Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials offers tools for SQL development, including version control and automation, promoting developer productivity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials is known for straightforward deployment and comprehensive support, making integration and ongoing use smooth. IBM InfoSphere Optim offers advanced technical support but may have a steeper learning curve and more complex deployment due to its extensive feature set.

Pricing and ROI: IBM InfoSphere Optim has higher initial setup costs with long-term value in environments needing strong data governance and compliance. Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials offers a budget-friendly upfront cost with rapid ROI through improved development workflows, providing faster returns.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM InfoSphere Optim

Ranking in Database Development and Management

15th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essent...

Ranking in Database Development and Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Database Development and Management category, the mindshare of IBM InfoSphere Optim is 2.6%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials is 6.0%, up from 5.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database Development and Management

Featured Reviews

Kenneth Estanislao

Solutions Designer at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Backups become efficient while cost concerns remain

I am still working with IBM and we are transitioning to other tools rather than using IBM InfoSphere Optim. We use other tools, but I cannot recall the name because I am not the one currently handling it. It has transitioned to other architects. For IBM InfoSphere Optim, we are still currently using it, but we have transitioned to the newer version, the latest one with support for AWS S3. I cannot identify a main competitor for IBM InfoSphere Optim because we have transitioned to other architects, and they are the ones looking for other tools. The last comparison I did was almost 4 years ago. I am not using any AI technology with IBM InfoSphere Optim. I rate IBM InfoSphere Optim a seven out of ten. The tool is good, but the price is not favorable as it is the most expensive part. I can recommend IBM InfoSphere Optim for enterprises.

Read full review

ChristopherSmith1

Director, Enterprise Data Management at Glatfelter Insurance Group

SQL Search and change automation functionality help us manage our code repository and databases

The biggest problem with the Redgate SQL Toolbelt is just how heavy it is; it seems to take a lot of resources. It takes a lot of memory and a lot of processing power to run, and that tends to slow things down a bit. Making it a little more lightweight while still doing the same thing, as much as possible, is what we would like to see in the future. I've noticed that Microsoft SSMS runs much quicker without RedGate installed than it does with it installed. From bootup of the app to opening query windows and connections, SSMS is quicker without Redgate than with, by a significant margin. The other area for improvement is regarding licensing. Every month or two my SSMS loses it's redgate license key and I need to re-enter the key to continue using Red Gate, even though the license is annual.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We like that we can easily restore the database with just a few clicks. The database is linked as well."

"I feel the solution to be a bit faster than the traditional methods, which makes it easy to customize."

"The compression feature is valuable because it achieves around 80% compression."

"It is easy to track the reports, this is what is most valuable for me."

"The most valuable feature is SQL Search."

Cons

"The potential room for improvement for IBM InfoSphere Optim is usually its cost, as it is too expensive."

"We're looking for a solution that can be implemented on AWS. IBM InfoSphere Optim can be implemented on AWS, but it costs more than double what we're currently paying. So, it's not really of good value for us."

"While the solution is very supportive of Db2, it is not so friendly when it comes to IMS databases."

"I would like to see the bandwidth increase allowing me to easily analyze more data."

"The biggest problem with the Redgate SQL Toolbelt is just how heavy it is; it seems to take a lot of resources."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"IBM InfoSphere Optim is a very expensive solution. Actually, it's the most expensive archiving solution that we have."

"Our fees are paid on an annual basis."

"The cost is about $3,500 USD per individual to buy, and then it's about 20% per year for renewal."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Insurance Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM InfoSphere Optim?

The potential room for improvement for IBM InfoSphere Optim is usually its cost, as it is too expensive. Currently, there are no issues with IBM InfoSphere Optim; the only problem is the cost, whic...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM InfoSphere Optim?

My current use case for IBM InfoSphere Optim is just for doing backups. We are using IBM InfoSphere Optim specifically for backup purposes.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM InfoSphere Optim?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Informatica Data Archive vs IBM InfoSphere Optim

Compared 47% of the time

Solix Enterprise Data Management vs IBM InfoSphere Optim

Compared 28% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs IBM InfoSphere Optim

Compared 26% of the time

More IBM InfoSphere Optim Competitors

IDERA SQL Diagnostic Manager for SQL Server vs Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

Compared 21% of the time

Nutanix Database Service vs Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

Compared 13% of the time

Quest Spotlight vs Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

Compared 12% of the time

Quest Foglight for Databases vs Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

Compared 12% of the time

Toad for Oracle vs Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

Compared 11% of the time

More Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

May 2025

Download IBM InfoSphere Optim product report

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

May 2025

Download Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials product report

Also Known As

IBM Optim, Optim

No data available

Overview

IBM Optim solutions manage data from requirements to retirement. They boost performance, empower collaboration, and improve governance across applications, databases and platforms. By managing data properly over its lifetime, organisations are better equipped to support business goals with less risk.

IBM

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials provides DBA teams with advanced tools for SQL development and deployment. It enhances productivity by simplifying complex tasks related to database management.

Designed for professionals managing SQL databases, Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials offers an integrated suite to streamline development pipelines and ensure deployments are efficient and error-free. It supports SQL code management, version control, and automated deployments, making it indispensable for organizations focusing on database performance and management. Its ease of integration and intuitive functionalities cater specifically to an audience that requires precision and reliability in database administration, providing an effective solution for maintaining high standards in database operations.

What are the most valuable features?

Version Control: Seamless integration with source control systems for managing SQL code changes.
Deployment Automation: Streamlines deployment processes, reducing human error and maintenance time.
Code Comparison: Highlights differences in SQL codes for better decision-making and debugging.
Performance Monitoring: Tools to monitor database processes and optimize performance effectively.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Improved Efficiency: Automates routine tasks, reducing manual oversight and freeing up valuable resources.
Risk Mitigation: Advanced version control and change tracking reduce database-related risks.
Time Savings: Speeds up development and deployment cycles, providing quicker turnarounds.

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials finds application in industries managing significant data workloads like finance, healthcare, and retail. Its deployment features ensure seamless integration into existing infrastructure, supporting critical operations dependent on robust database architecture. It aligns with industry-specific demands by offering reliable solutions tailored with precision.

Redgate

Sample Customers

Durham Police Department, Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc., Continental, KCE Electronics Public Company Limited, The University of Adelaide, Migros Zurich, COPROB

Thinger.fi, Churchill College Univeristy of Cambridge, Margin Business Solutions Ltd., 4Penny.net, Sportinginsider.net, Lockheed Martin, Phillip Securities Pte Ltd, Nmbrs

Buyer's Guide

IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

June 2025

Free Report: IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials report.

See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.

We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.