We performed a comparison between IBM Business Automation Workflow and TIBCO iProcess Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."IBM Business Automation Workflow is stable because the different infrastructure elements, such as the OS and middleware have been used for a long time."
"It performs the basic tasks that are required for the BBM solution as part of the overall integration with ECM or enterprise contact management."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is the fact it is highly configurable. We can do configurations very easily."
"It helps develop applications very quickly. Once clients get used to it and familiar with the methodology, then they don't feel so locked in. It is able to add this element of agility to our clients' software development lifecycle. That is my favorite thing about it: You're not so locked in as you used to be when developing applications."
"It's a flexible solution."
"The most valuable feature is automation, which is quite strong and we are quite happy with it."
"The business process modeling is the most valuable feature."
"It gives us the ability to create toolkits and use them across many different applications. It allows us to write things one time, instead of having to write a diary for every single different application. We can write at once and reuse it."
"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."
"The main improvement would be to make it easier to implement and deploy so that customers can kick it off and run quickly."
"I would definitely like to see a unified interface between the BPM side of the house and the case side of the house. Something that just seems a bit more cohesive, because right now there is sort of a disconnect between the BPM and the case side of the house. That makes it a bit of a hard sell sometimes. That is definitely first and foremost on my wish list."
"The initial setup is actually a really complicated process."
"Improvements could be made in debugging and troubleshooting."
"I feel that the features are not user-friendly."
"Integrating the solution with existing systems can be complicated and it needs careful planning and execution."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow is not a very user-friendly solution."
"In terms of improvement, it could be less complex."
"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."
More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Business Automation Workflow is ranked 13th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while TIBCO iProcess Suite is ranked 40th in Business Process Management (BPM). IBM Business Automation Workflow is rated 7.6, while TIBCO iProcess Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Business Automation Workflow writes "Good for case management, integration capabilities but lacks stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO iProcess Suite writes "An easy-to-use solution with great integration". IBM Business Automation Workflow is most compared with IBM BPM, Camunda, Apache Airflow, IBM Case Foundation and AWS Step Functions, whereas TIBCO iProcess Suite is most compared with Apache Airflow, TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM, Pega BPM and Camunda. See our IBM Business Automation Workflow vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.