No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Hyland Perceptive Content vs Siav Archiflow comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Hyland Perceptive Content
Average Rating
6.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Document Management Software (14th)
Siav Archiflow
Average Rating
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Content Management (34th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Content Management solutions, they serve different purposes. Hyland Perceptive Content is designed for Document Management Software and holds a mindshare of 3.0%, up 2.7% compared to last year.
Siav Archiflow, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise Content Management, holds 0.6% mindshare, up 0.3% since last year.
Document Management Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Hyland Perceptive Content3.0%
Alfresco11.7%
OpenText Content Manager7.9%
Other77.4%
Document Management Software
Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Siav Archiflow0.6%
SharePoint11.6%
OpenText Content Management8.0%
Other79.8%
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

it_user588597 - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Accountant at a construction company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Once a document is scanned, you can neither edit it nor change its location.
I would like it to have more functions, like Bluebeam. It can be improved so that we can edit the file that got scanned into the system. If we scan the document to the wrong place, we can’t change it. As an example, if something was scanned as a reference, but should be an invoice, you cannot change it afterwards. I think it should have more functions that will allow us to edit the file in ImageNow -- such as adding pages, deleting pages. I also think it should have more hot keys (maybe I just don’t know there are) for easier “route forward”, “view next item”, so I don’t have to use my mouse. There is also a question that came up when I was using it recently, why do we need both “properties” and “forms”? If we index the document in Forms, it will take a long time for it to move to another queue and show the info. If we index it in Properties, it will update immediately. My question is why do we need both? Can’t we just put info in Forms and it will work just like Properties? It is time-consuming to put info in both pages. If the invoice is out of balance, maybe there should be a function that stops it being routed forward. If we route it by accident, it takes time for the approver to reject and routed back. If we can catch it in the first place and fix it when there is a warning sign. I know that there will be a red message saying “out of balance”, but it doesn’t always show up. Is it possible for us to “recall” the routed item? Just like recalling an email that you accidentally sent out. Can we make the Notes section working like a sticky note so it shows name/date, shows the most recent message on top. Sticky note is hard to read (too small) and easily get missed as people put it anywhere. We use notes section for every invoice. We often put a lot of messages there and it gets messy.
it_user109623 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Consultant at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Easy to store information and maintan workflow but we use QlikView for reporting because built in reporting is poor.
Workflow Reorganized the workflow for purchase invoice. My customer uses version 6, I haven't seen the new one. If it hasn't yet been upgraded in the new version, I feel that the interface can be improved to be more windows like. Since 2008 We didn't have any deployment issues. While version 5…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"If you want to go paperless, this is a great product."
"Customizability that the product gives to make the end user happy."
"I like the ability to have workflows."
"There are no lost documents, and everyone can see them based on security clearance."
"We didn't experience any issues with the initial setup, it was easy."
 

Cons

"Too many companies/products have been purchased by Perceptive over the past few years with what feels like little development on currently owned products."
"Bar Code OCR ICR."
"From my understanding, ImageNow licenses are not compatible with laptop computers (at least not with the one that I have). Therefore, if I have a PDF on my screen, in order to get it into ImageNow, I have to either email it to someone with a license, who can print directly to ImageNow, or print it out and have someone at a scanning station, scan it in and then link it to a student’s record."
"It will stop working if you are in the system for too long."
"Customer Service: 5/10. The supplier is slow to answer but now it's better with a self employed consultant."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Document Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Healthcare Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
12%
University
10%
Construction Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

ImageNow
Archiflow
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Sinelec, Vimea, JOS, Silenea, Ravenia, Adecco, Euronics, Zeis, Unogas, Kerry, Suez, MSC Crociers
Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland, Microsoft, Conga and others in Document Management Software. Updated: March 2026.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.