

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
I have seen a return on investment with Hyland OnBase because it provides a very reliable ECM platform for my organization, helps to remove the dependency on paper files and file folders, saves real estate costs, and facilitates the ability to work from anywhere.
Now, we can work and share live documents; they can see the real-time changes being made, and we can even get on a meeting and work on the document at the same time.
With Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, the collaboration, versioning control, and data accuracy improved, allowing us to finish the project in just one month or two instead of six.
With Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, they can collaborate in a very fast way.
Our vendor relationship facilitated integration with our system and offered additional service beyond the Hyland OnBase product.
I find technical support from Hyland to be good.
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is in an end-of-support era, so there is very limited customer support available.
The customer support for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is very responsive and proactive.
They got good results and everything is working, so it turned out okay.
Transitioning to cloud-based services may reduce these costs in the future.
We did not have any problem scaling Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7.
For large organizations, I would recommend Sharepoint Online or cloud-based solutions as better options.
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is very scalable because it has continued to handle my organization's growth efficiently.
Hyland OnBase was a stable solution that worked effectively for us.
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is stable in my experience.
The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions.
Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, addressing some concerns.
If AI could be used more at an enterprise level, since we are purchasing at an enterprise level for the subscription of Hyland OnBase, I would say if those AI informations would stay within the enterprise and not go outside of our enterprise boundaries, it would be secure and maintain our privacy.
I would like to see more of AI's analytics and observations come into Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, particularly regarding user interface, speed, or integration with other tools.
Sometimes it would have been quicker to search outside of Microsoft or Sharepoint and use Google, or even find a YouTube video that explained how to do something, which should not be necessary for a Microsoft product that we pay for.
We can definitely improve the search feature, which should crawl every page and every list to retrieve data.
We also paid for workflow licenses, which allowed up to 250 concurrent users.
I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very cost-effective and affordable.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has been transparent
It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them.
The workflow engine has made the biggest difference for me because it is excellent for automating approval processes.
Hyland OnBase has impacted my organization positively by faster document retrieval, intuitive setup, reduced manual processing, and comes with security.
The workflows that connect Outlook, Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, and OneDrive among others allow me to manage multiple actions for all these tools.
The workflow feature specifically helped my team by not only improving efficiency but also impacting our costs, as it saved on printer, paper, and ink consumption while allowing managers to approve requests from anywhere at any time.
I am not sure how we would share some of these resources as easily with another solution, especially being able to control who can access what at different levels and who can edit which files, who can upload, and who can see different things.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Hyland OnBase | 4.9% |
| Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 | 0.4% |
| Other | 94.7% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows Server 2012r2-24x7 features robust security, seamless Microsoft integration, and workflow automation, enhancing collaboration, file sharing, and document management.
Organizations leverage Sharepoint 2010 on Windows Server 2012r2-24x7 for online data storage and efficient business process automation. It offers improved communication and secure file sharing through real-time collaboration and mobile access. While the platform increases productivity with version history and access control, areas such as offline functionality and performance enhancement need focus. The outdated user experience and limited browser support are aspects requiring attention.
What are the key features of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows Server 2012r2-24x7?In specific industries, Sharepoint 2010 on Windows Server 2012r2-24x7 is utilized for secure document management and collaboration. Manufacturing companies use it for managing complex workflows and storing files securely. In healthcare, it supports data consistency and real-time collaboration to ensure quality patient care.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.