Huawei Enterprise Routers vs Juniper Session Smart Router comparison

"The most valuable features for us are NAT, ATS, server capabilities, VPN tunneling, and management."

"It is a robust and efficient solution."

"The solution provides support for 5G connectivity."

"When we started, the connection was amazing for the 100G between the switches and the co-switch. What the students typically use for school is a maximum is 40 so they now have faster technology."

"The product is good, easy to manage , and works fine."

"The product is very reasonably priced."

"The most valuable feature of Huawei Enterprise Routers is if have two networks at different geographical locations with a great deal of distance they work together as if they are on the same cloud network."

"Overall we have found the solution to be satisfactory."

"They provided us with a customized product according to our requirements."

"Customer service is very prompt."

"As compared to the other major vendors in the SD-WAN market, such as VeloCloud, Cisco, and others, the tunnel-free and secure vector routing technology is its major USP, which gives plenty of room to discuss with the customer why IPSec from 1998 is a bit outdated."

"The most valuable feature of Juniper Session Smart Router is its unique SDR channel."

"The solution is especially Session's smart, application-aware, AI-based."

"Huawei Enterprise Routers can improve by enhancing their security. The software architecture and the operating system that runs on their router and the security capability are not as strong when compared to Cisco."

"They should include features like IPS for security and response."

"The internet speed reduces throughout the day. The tool is not stable."

"In the next release of this solution, I would like to see better bandwidth management, more granular web filtering, and portal authentication."

"The product's pricing could be better."

"The configuration is complex and should be simplified."

"We'd like the product to be more flexible so that we could more easily manipulate some of the features."

"The documentation is somewhat lacking and not easy to navigate."

"Juniper Session Smart Router can improve the integration for Wi-Fi devices and add additional Sassy deployments."

"Juniper Session Smart Router could be better in terms of software performance."

"Regarding improvement, we still need to see what it can do."

"The UI of the SSR conductor is the main part where improvements can be done. Today, for every configuration step, you have to do a series of clicks. What we are missing there are wizards. For example, I have two applications, and I want one application to be prioritized against the other. In such a case, a wizard for assigning policies to a service without configuring each step by hand would be very helpful. There should be an overhaul of the GUI of the conductor. The functionality they have got in the Mist portal should be baked into the conductor itself. It would be really great, but as we all know, that won't happen."

"The solution is cheap compared to Cisco."

"The price of the solution is fair."

"There are additional licensing costs. I am aware of additional licenses and which services are added to the router."

"The product is inexpensive, but there is an extra cost for replacement of the device."

"Huawei Enterprise Routers’s cost is average. I rate its pricing a five out of ten."

"The product is expensive."

"There is no licence for this solution, but the solution could be cheaper."

"The price is reasonable compared to Cisco's."

"We are currently renegotiating the offer for the licenses and the license bundle model. The license for an ISP has to be different from the license for an end customer. This is something we are currently renegotiating with Juniper, but, of course, the pricing for the licensing is always an issue when you want to get more customers."

"It is a simple bandwidth-based license and the orchestration comes bundled with the solution by default."