HPE StoreEasy vs IBM FlashSystem comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and IBM are both solutions in the NAS category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.8, while IBM is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.5. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 4.7% mindshare in N, compared to IBM’s 12.9% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of IBM users who would recommend it.

HPE StoreEasy

Read 12 HPE StoreEasy reviews

1,321 Views
655 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

IBM FlashSystem

Read 111 IBM FlashSystem reviews

3,366 Views
746 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

HPE StoreEasy

IBM FlashSystem

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

IBM FlashSystem and HPE StoreEasy compete in the enterprise storage category. IBM FlashSystem has the edge in performance, while HPE StoreEasy is more competitive in pricing.

Features: IBM FlashSystem offers high performance, low latency, and virtualization capabilities, making it a robust choice for businesses seeking advanced storage solutions. Its compression technology and high IOPS rates significantly enhance performance for critical applications. HPE StoreEasy is known for its storage reliability, ease of deployment, and compatibility with virtual machines, providing a solid feature set for businesses focused on seamless integration with existing infrastructure.

Room for Improvement: IBM FlashSystem could improve its scalability, replication features, and cost-effectiveness. Users also desire more detailed reporting and better monitoring tools. In contrast, HPE StoreEasy needs to improve technical support, offer better scalability options, and address cloud storage access limitations. Users also report challenges with migrating large datasets and potential compatibility issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both IBM FlashSystem and HPE StoreEasy are mainly deployed on-premises, with IBM having some hybrid cloud capabilities. IBM's customer service enjoys high ratings, though technical support feedback varies. HPE StoreEasy offers strong customer service but requires improvements in its technical support infrastructure to keep up with changing customer needs.

Pricing and ROI: IBM FlashSystem is perceived as a premium choice with higher initial costs but offers robust performance and comprehensive features that lead to strong ROI in performance-critical environments. HPE StoreEasy provides a budget-friendly alternative with lower initial costs, making it appealing to businesses focusing on cost-efficiency and delivering favorable ROI, particularly for SMBs.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE StoreEasy

Ranking in NAS

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM FlashSystem

Ranking in NAS

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

111

Ranking in other categories

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (3rd), All-Flash Storage (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the NAS category, the mindshare of HPE StoreEasy is 4.7%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM FlashSystem is 12.9%, down from 13.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS

Featured Reviews

Vinoth Bala

HPE Consultant at Mannai

Reliable, cost-effective, and easy to deploy and manage

I did not have any difficulties in deploying StoreEasy for the customers. It is user-friendly and easy to deploy. It has a Windows Server and a required license built in. For implementation, we follow the HPE documentation. We follow the Configuration guide and the Installation guide. For all HPE products, we follow the HPE documentation. For a single box, it takes a maximum of two days. It depends on the customer's availability. For different configurations, it can take two to three days. The number of people required varies from customer to customer, but generally, it requires three people. For mounting the storage, we always have three people to unbox, mount, and do other things. It does not require any maintenance. From the data center perspective, maintaining StoreEasy is very easy. No customer has complained about any difficulty in maintaining StoreEasy.

Read full review

Raanan Sitton

Vice President Sales at BELOCAL LTD

Offers cost-effective storage for small companies with budget constraints

IBM FlashSystem 5300 is offered at a very low cost in Israel, which is advantageous for small companies. However, other features like deduplication and compression do not perform effectively. The price sensitivity makes it a viable option for clients with budgetary constraints, as it allows us to secure deals based on the cost rather than advanced performance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to manage. There is a management console that comes with StoreEasy. It simplifies managing storage permission. There is snapshot scheduling as well. The updates and everything else is good."

"I can use both the on-premises and cloud storage options. I need to have an APR extension from StoreEasy, and it's that simple."

"I like the user quotas, integrations, and separations for storage."

"This solution allows me to better and more easily manage user data without impacting my primary storage."

"The tool's data protection capabilities are robust."

"I like the tool's provisioning feature and OneView."

"StoreEasy is a better solution for backup purposes."

"HPE StoreEasy is a stable and high-performing solution that HPE supports effectively."

More HPE StoreEasy pros

"The performance of IBM FlashSystem is very good. The new technology and high throughput have given us more confidence in the solution. The management of the system has improved and we can control the monitoring system alerts and multiple FlashSystems with the Enterprise Cloud Edition, which is free. The migration of recently stored data to a new flash is much easier. You can move your data because you can utilize it externally."

"The power systems are very reliable if you are running 24/7 operations. For ongoing mission-critical applications, it's the best solution."

"One of the most valuable features is that it's very easy to use and configure. It used to be more difficult, but now it's almost flawless."

"I like most of the features. Its speed, performance, and availability are valuable. We are implementing the data reduction technology the most."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is compression."

"The most valuable feature is that is supports a high IOPS rate."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is replication...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."

"Stability-wise, this solution is fine."

More IBM FlashSystem pros

Cons

"The support of HPE StoreEasy can improve its responsiveness. Dell support is better."

"It would be better if it were more scalable. In the next release, I would like to access some Microsoft Windows storage server features. I guess the newest version of Windows Server has some restrictions."

"There are some SKUs in StoreEasy that are built to order, and there are only limited options, such as StoreEasy 1670 and 1870, which can be configured to order based on customer preferences."

"When I configure the StoreEasy in a complex environment I have problems finding compatibility with all the software."

"There could be improvements in providing more hardening options on the operating system side, similar to iLO's security scoreboard."

"We need some monitoring tools and it would be helpful if they were included."

"There is a default Windows installation. Sometimes, when it crashes, the HPE support team asks the customer to reinstall it. That is the only issue customers are facing."

"There are some SKUs in StoreEasy that are built to order, and there are only limited options, such as StoreEasy 1670 and 1870, which can be configured to order based on customer preferences."

More HPE StoreEasy cons

"I think the only thing the developers can look at, is that it is limited to 25 gigabytes currently. In the next release they might want to increase that."

"One area for improvement is in the GUI, where host clusters are not properly dealt with. With Hypervisor host clusters, all hosts must see the same volumes in the same order. Using the concept of a “host-group” has been around (even with IBM) for many years, so why not with the V7000?"

"I have looked at a few pages of a report I download and I saw a graph there regarding software-defined vendors. IBM is not in a good position on this graph. I know that they are working very hard on this, to make it much better and to get to a level where it's not only hardware but also software to provide a complete solution."

"The pricing could be improved, but I think it's getting better and better with each version. IBM needs to implement NAS storage again, as this is a big flaw. Dell EMC is very good at this and if you compared them based on NAS storage, Dell EMC would win right away. IBM's solution for NAS storage is very complicated. We don't have a storage box that provides file sharing from itself, we have to put software on it and go through a whole complicated process. It should be simplified."

"The interface could improve in IBM FlashSystem."

"The solution's infrastructure technology level could be PCI Express 5 instead of PCI Express 4 for the next version."

"The deduplication and compression ratio is not very good. It's not reaching a very high ratio."

"They can include Amazon file system S3 protocol in the upcoming releases. It is a cloud file system. IBM FlashSystem doesn't have this feature in the box for high-end or mid-range. We have got requests for this from customers because we need to use S3 for EDI application storage. At the beginning of every year, IBM releases firmware. When I find any bugs in the firmware during the year, I am unable to find any information from IBM regarding the bug. I need to open a ticket, and the IBM engineering team makes a patch only for me. This patch is not public. By creating a customized patch for a client, they don't really solve the issue for everyone. If multiple users have the same bug, IBM should upload the patch on the official website so that we can download it. IBM FlashSystem has a monitoring tool in the box, but it is not advanced. I need a more advanced tool for more advanced equations and monitoring. All top three storage vendors, that is, EMC, IBM, and Pure Storage, don't have a powerful monitoring tool. To monitor our box to show the statistics for I/Os and latency, I need to pay for extra software. The built-in monitoring storage is not mature enough to handle all requests and generate all reports that I need. They can include the functionality to stretch a cluster natively without using any additional boxes. In addition, there are some features that EMC has integrated with the box. These features are not available in IBM FlashSystem."

More IBM FlashSystem cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Based on what I hear from our customers, it is not very expensive. From the cost perspective, I see nobody complaining about its cost."

"This is an economical solution for the company and I am satisfied with the pricing."

"The price of HPE StoreEasy is approximately $15,000 to $20,000 and it is a one-time purchase. The price is similar to competitors, such as Dell."

"I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten. You need to pay additional costs for the solution."

"If five is a good price and one is a high price, I would rate the price a two or three out of five."

"Our customers would like IMB FlashSystem to be less expensive."

"I would rate the pricing of this solution a four out of five."

"The solution requires a license and could be less expensive."

"IBM V7000 has a new license and price structure which provides intuitive licensing based on the functions customers wish to enable and use the most."

"The total storage capacity vs price is still quite high for the IBM Flash Array."

"The price of IBM FlashSystem is reasonable."

"The cost is pretty high in terms of licensing. We pay at least $100,000 USD in licensing fees for the storage."

More IBM FlashSystem pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE StoreEasy?

HPE StoreEasy is competitively priced compared to competitors. It offers configuration options, such as different processor powers, to adapt to the client's needs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE StoreEasy?

The product is stable, running on Windows Server ( /products/windows-server-reviews ) with updates from HPE, including those for iLO. There could be improvements in providing more hardening options...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE StoreEasy?

I use HPE StoreEasy ( /products/hpe-storeeasy-reviews ) to provide file sharing to our business users. We are a logistics business, specifically a port.

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM FlashSystem?

It is simple to make an update.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM FlashSystem?

Many factors affect purchasing directly from IBM, often involving a multi-step process. Customers, especially in banking, often use the latest devices as they are upgrading, indicating they do not ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM FlashSystem?

The deduplication technology in IBM FlashSystem needs significant improvement. Other vendors like NetApp ( /products/netapp-41749-reviews ) offer better deduplication technology, which is noticeabl...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 53% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 26% of the time

IBM Scale-out NAS vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 9% of the time

FreeNAS vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 6% of the time

Dell PowerStore vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 3% of the time

More HPE StoreEasy Competitors

Dell PowerStore vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 22% of the time

Pure Storage FlashArray vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 8% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 8% of the time

Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 8% of the time

NetApp AFF vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM FlashSystem Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NAS

June 2025

Download HPE StoreEasy product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM FlashSystem

June 2025

Download IBM FlashSystem product report

Also Known As

HP StoreEasy

IBM Storwize

Overview

HP StoreEasy Storage is the #1 NAS product family under $15K USD range in units. Count on optimized, efficient, secure and highly available storage that simply addresses file and application storage challenges, no matter the size of your business. Straightforward features and new enhancements mean simpler installation and monitoring of utilization and health status.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

IBM FlashSystem products are enterprise computer data storage systems that store data on flash memory chips. Unlike storage systems that use standard solid-state drives, IBM FlashSystem products incorporate custom hardware based on technology from the 2012 acquisition of Texas Memory Systems. This hardware provides performance, reliability, and efficiency benefits versus competitive offerings.

IBM

Sample Customers

John Lewis, HPE IT, Comline AG, AmeriPride Services

Celero, Friedhelm Loh Group, Clarks, Mingkang Natregro Health Food Group, Sofia, Etisalat Fights Fraud, UF Health Shands Hospital, Generali, Elecon Engineering Company Limited, Ventiv , Technology, CPFL Energia, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., SciQuest, Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated, Paddy Power, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Interconnect Services, Severstal IP-Only AB, PVU Group GmbH

Buyer's Guide

HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem

June 2025

Free Report: HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.