HPE StoreEasy vs IBM FlashSystem comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and IBM are both solutions in the NAS category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.8, while IBM is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 4.6% mindshare in N, compared to IBM’s 12.5% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of IBM users who would recommend it.

HPE StoreEasy

Read 12 HPE StoreEasy reviews

1,237 Views
1,237 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

IBM FlashSystem

Read 112 IBM FlashSystem reviews

8,010 Views
3,124 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

HPE StoreEasy

IBM FlashSystem

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

IBM FlashSystem and HPE StoreEasy compete in the enterprise storage category. IBM FlashSystem has the edge in performance, while HPE StoreEasy is more competitive in pricing.

Features: IBM FlashSystem offers high performance, low latency, and virtualization capabilities, making it a robust choice for businesses seeking advanced storage solutions. Its compression technology and high IOPS rates significantly enhance performance for critical applications. HPE StoreEasy is known for its storage reliability, ease of deployment, and compatibility with virtual machines, providing a solid feature set for businesses focused on seamless integration with existing infrastructure.

Room for Improvement: IBM FlashSystem could improve its scalability, replication features, and cost-effectiveness. Users also desire more detailed reporting and better monitoring tools. In contrast, HPE StoreEasy needs to improve technical support, offer better scalability options, and address cloud storage access limitations. Users also report challenges with migrating large datasets and potential compatibility issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both IBM FlashSystem and HPE StoreEasy are mainly deployed on-premises, with IBM having some hybrid cloud capabilities. IBM's customer service enjoys high ratings, though technical support feedback varies. HPE StoreEasy offers strong customer service but requires improvements in its technical support infrastructure to keep up with changing customer needs.

Pricing and ROI: IBM FlashSystem is perceived as a premium choice with higher initial costs but offers robust performance and comprehensive features that lead to strong ROI in performance-critical environments. HPE StoreEasy provides a budget-friendly alternative with lower initial costs, making it appealing to businesses focusing on cost-efficiency and delivering favorable ROI, particularly for SMBs.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE StoreEasy

Ranking in NAS

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM FlashSystem

Ranking in NAS

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

112

Ranking in other categories

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (2nd), All-Flash Storage (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the NAS category, the mindshare of HPE StoreEasy is 4.6%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM FlashSystem is 12.5%, down from 13.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS

Featured Reviews

MervynMorgan

IT Storage Engineer at Unixque Solutions Pty Ltd

Effortless backup and capacity management with seamless implementation

In our organization, we use HPE StoreEasy for tasks that require backing up data and maintaining capacity. It's a solution we use almost daily for these purposes HPE StoreEasy has helped us with easy implementation, maintenance, and administration. The most beneficial feature of HPE StoreEasy…

Read full review

OmarIsmail1

Infrastructure Technical Specialist II at Clicks Group

Offers high performance and dependable support for fast storage needs

The most valuable feature of IBM FlashSystem is its robust back code. When integrated properly into the environment and configured according to the guidelines, it provides a very solid infrastructure that does the job on demand. Additionally, IBM FlashSystem offers competitive pricing and reliable performance. The hardware is dependable, ensuring that it functions effectively when the setup is done correctly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"HPE StoreEasy is a stable and high-performing solution that HPE supports effectively."

"The most valuable feature of HPE StoreEasy is the storing of virtual machines."

"The most beneficial feature of HPE StoreEasy for us is its easy implementation and maintenance."

"I like the user quotas, integrations, and separations for storage."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the duplication."

"It is easy to manage. There is a management console that comes with StoreEasy. It simplifies managing storage permission. There is snapshot scheduling as well. The updates and everything else is good."

"The tool's data protection capabilities are robust."

"I can use both the on-premises and cloud storage options. I need to have an APR extension from StoreEasy, and it's that simple."

More HPE StoreEasy pros

"This solution is very stable."

"The ability to create LUNs and modify them are the most valuable features of this solution."

"The price-performance ratio is most valuable."

"IBM FlashSystem has an easy to use GUI, similar to the IBM Storewize family, which make it one of the best flash storage systems in the market."

"Speed (IOPS/second) – It is most vital for applications that need low latency and high speed for transferring the data."

"The performance of the All-Flash System is very good. There is more enhanced performance and data production in the solution, which I appreciate."

"The most valuable features were the performance of the array, i.e., very low latency and high IOPS. Plus, the management interface is very easy to use."

"The speed of the unit is its best feature. It performs very well."

More IBM FlashSystem pros

Cons

"The cluster service is not available in the latest version of HPE StoreEasy."

"When I configure the StoreEasy in a complex environment I have problems finding compatibility with all the software."

"It would be better if it were more scalable. In the next release, I would like to access some Microsoft Windows storage server features. I guess the newest version of Windows Server has some restrictions."

"There could be improvements in providing more hardening options on the operating system side, similar to iLO's security scoreboard."

"We need some monitoring tools and it would be helpful if they were included."

"I would like to improve the tool's technical support. I would also like to see the product's hybrid cloud version."

"There are some SKUs in StoreEasy that are built to order, and there are only limited options, such as StoreEasy 1670 and 1870, which can be configured to order based on customer preferences."

"There is a default Windows installation. Sometimes, when it crashes, the HPE support team asks the customer to reinstall it. That is the only issue customers are facing."

More HPE StoreEasy cons

"The deduplication technology in IBM FlashSystem needs significant improvement."

"The GUI needs some improvement."

"Product support is restricted to IBM only. It must be decentralized to IBM partners as well."

"I would like to see an improvement in the handling of large amounts of rights."

"The interface could improve in IBM FlashSystem."

"This product lacks some of the options we wanted. For example, expansion was difficult and it required a lot of patching to be done."

"I know they have a flashcopy manager, but it is extra software, an additional license, and some customers don't like to add addition costs to their infrastructure. If IBM could create, or include snapshot management within the GUI, that would really be helpful."

"The customer's expectations are what they get on the cloud, they're expecting even in the on-premises deployments, going forward."

More IBM FlashSystem cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an economical solution for the company and I am satisfied with the pricing."

"I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten. You need to pay additional costs for the solution."

"Based on what I hear from our customers, it is not very expensive. From the cost perspective, I see nobody complaining about its cost."

"The price of HPE StoreEasy is approximately $15,000 to $20,000 and it is a one-time purchase. The price is similar to competitors, such as Dell."

"I find the pricing of the solution to be very reasonable."

"The cost of the IBM FlashSystem is lower than the HPE solution."

"I'd rate the basic licensing and the Virtualize software a ten out of ten, and the extra Spectrum and other an eight out of ten."

"The price depends of the technology that our customers need. The price can come at a lower cost but this may increase as storage is added."

"The integration is already included in the license cost of IBM FlashSystem. The integration is very easy. You get the IBM storage core with all software, firmware, and upgrades. EMC provides the features in the box, but they are not free for customers. There is a licensing cost for features. We have yearly licensing, but IBM has also provided a new option where you pay as you go. They provide a big box, and I pay, for example, for 10 terabytes. If I exceed 10 terabytes, IBM will charge for the new storage after 10 terabytes. It is a good opportunity in the market for using the storage as a cloud and paying as you go."

"This is an expensive product and if the price were reduced it would be better."

"The price of IBM FlashSystem is a little high because you pay a premium because the solution is from IBM. We had paid for the SLA prior to using the solution."

"The pricing has been very competitive for the last few years. IBM got to the point where they changed the pricing model and we feel very comfortable with the pricing. It's very competitive. Over the last two years, IBM has been coming up with all kinds of interesting promos, especially for the SMB systems. That makes it very competitive price-wise and in terms of performance..."

More IBM FlashSystem pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE StoreEasy?

HPE StoreEasy is competitively priced compared to competitors. It offers configuration options, such as different processor powers, to adapt to the client's needs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE StoreEasy?

The product is stable, running on Windows Server ( /products/windows-server-reviews ) with updates from HPE, including those for iLO. There could be improvements in providing more hardening options...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE StoreEasy?

I use HPE StoreEasy ( /products/hpe-storeeasy-reviews ) to provide file sharing to our business users. We are a logistics business, specifically a port.

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM FlashSystem?

It is simple to make an update.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM FlashSystem?

Many factors affect purchasing directly from IBM, often involving a multi-step process. Customers, especially in banking, often use the latest devices as they are upgrading, indicating they do not ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM FlashSystem?

The deduplication technology in IBM FlashSystem needs significant improvement. Other vendors like NetApp ( /products/netapp-41749-reviews ) offer better deduplication technology, which is noticeabl...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 50% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 27% of the time

IBM Scale-out NAS vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 9% of the time

Dell PowerStore vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 6% of the time

FreeNAS vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE StoreEasy Competitors

Dell PowerStore vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 22% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 9% of the time

Pure Storage FlashArray vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 8% of the time

Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 8% of the time

NetApp AFF vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM FlashSystem Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NAS

August 2025

Download HPE StoreEasy product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM FlashSystem

August 2025

Download IBM FlashSystem product report

Also Known As

HP StoreEasy

IBM Storwize

Overview

HP StoreEasy Storage is the #1 NAS product family under $15K USD range in units. Count on optimized, efficient, secure and highly available storage that simply addresses file and application storage challenges, no matter the size of your business. Straightforward features and new enhancements mean simpler installation and monitoring of utilization and health status.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

IBM FlashSystem products are enterprise computer data storage systems that store data on flash memory chips. Unlike storage systems that use standard solid-state drives, IBM FlashSystem products incorporate custom hardware based on technology from the 2012 acquisition of Texas Memory Systems. This hardware provides performance, reliability, and efficiency benefits versus competitive offerings.

IBM

Sample Customers

John Lewis, HPE IT, Comline AG, AmeriPride Services

Celero, Friedhelm Loh Group, Clarks, Mingkang Natregro Health Food Group, Sofia, Etisalat Fights Fraud, UF Health Shands Hospital, Generali, Elecon Engineering Company Limited, Ventiv , Technology, CPFL Energia, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., SciQuest, Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated, Paddy Power, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Interconnect Services, Severstal IP-Only AB, PVU Group GmbH

Buyer's Guide

HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem

July 2025

Free Report: HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.