HPE StoreEasy vs IBM FlashSystem comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and IBM are both solutions in the NAS category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.8, while IBM is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.5. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 4.7% mindshare in N, compared to IBM’s 12.9% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of IBM users who would recommend it.

HPE StoreEasy

Read 12 HPE StoreEasy reviews

1,321 Views
655 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

IBM FlashSystem

Read 111 IBM FlashSystem reviews

3,366 Views
746 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

HPE StoreEasy

IBM FlashSystem

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

IBM FlashSystem and HPE StoreEasy compete in the enterprise storage category. IBM FlashSystem has the edge in performance, while HPE StoreEasy is more competitive in pricing.

Features: IBM FlashSystem offers high performance, low latency, and virtualization capabilities, making it a robust choice for businesses seeking advanced storage solutions. Its compression technology and high IOPS rates significantly enhance performance for critical applications. HPE StoreEasy is known for its storage reliability, ease of deployment, and compatibility with virtual machines, providing a solid feature set for businesses focused on seamless integration with existing infrastructure.

Room for Improvement: IBM FlashSystem could improve its scalability, replication features, and cost-effectiveness. Users also desire more detailed reporting and better monitoring tools. In contrast, HPE StoreEasy needs to improve technical support, offer better scalability options, and address cloud storage access limitations. Users also report challenges with migrating large datasets and potential compatibility issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both IBM FlashSystem and HPE StoreEasy are mainly deployed on-premises, with IBM having some hybrid cloud capabilities. IBM's customer service enjoys high ratings, though technical support feedback varies. HPE StoreEasy offers strong customer service but requires improvements in its technical support infrastructure to keep up with changing customer needs.

Pricing and ROI: IBM FlashSystem is perceived as a premium choice with higher initial costs but offers robust performance and comprehensive features that lead to strong ROI in performance-critical environments. HPE StoreEasy provides a budget-friendly alternative with lower initial costs, making it appealing to businesses focusing on cost-efficiency and delivering favorable ROI, particularly for SMBs.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,579 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE StoreEasy

Ranking in NAS

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM FlashSystem

Ranking in NAS

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

111

Ranking in other categories

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (3rd), All-Flash Storage (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the NAS category, the mindshare of HPE StoreEasy is 4.7%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM FlashSystem is 12.9%, down from 13.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS

Featured Reviews

Vinoth Bala

HPE Consultant at Mannai

Reliable, cost-effective, and easy to deploy and manage

I did not have any difficulties in deploying StoreEasy for the customers. It is user-friendly and easy to deploy. It has a Windows Server and a required license built in. For implementation, we follow the HPE documentation. We follow the Configuration guide and the Installation guide. For all HPE products, we follow the HPE documentation. For a single box, it takes a maximum of two days. It depends on the customer's availability. For different configurations, it can take two to three days. The number of people required varies from customer to customer, but generally, it requires three people. For mounting the storage, we always have three people to unbox, mount, and do other things. It does not require any maintenance. From the data center perspective, maintaining StoreEasy is very easy. No customer has complained about any difficulty in maintaining StoreEasy.

Read full review

OmarIsmail1

Infrastructure Technical Specialist II at Clicks Group

Offers high performance and dependable support for fast storage needs

The most valuable feature of IBM FlashSystem ( /products/ibm-flashsystem-reviews ) is its robust back code. When integrated properly into the environment and configured according to the guidelines, it provides a very solid infrastructure that does the job on demand. Additionally, IBM FlashSystem offers competitive pricing and reliable performance. The hardware is dependable, ensuring that it functions effectively when the setup is done correctly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's most valuable feature is the duplication."

"I can use both the on-premises and cloud storage options. I need to have an APR extension from StoreEasy, and it's that simple."

"The tool's data protection capabilities are robust."

"I like the tool's provisioning feature and OneView."

"StoreEasy offers reliable file services, which is a critical factor for customers looking for solid infrastructure."

"This solution allows me to better and more easily manage user data without impacting my primary storage."

"The most beneficial feature of HPE StoreEasy for us is its easy implementation and maintenance."

"I like the user quotas, integrations, and separations for storage."

More HPE StoreEasy pros

"IBM FlashSystem is a powerful effective storage solution. Additionally, it is user-friendly, anyone can use it."

"The most valuable features are, of course, the virtualization of the storage, the performance, and the compression."

"The solution is very easy to configure and use."

"High availability and enhanced security; Proven dependability; Data compression with hardware acceleration; Advanced copy services features are all in this product."

"When it comes to the interface of the solution we did not encounter any challenges. Additionally, the solution has good documentation."

"The all-flash storage has tier replication capabilities."

"The speed of the unit is its best feature. It performs very well."

"IBM products at the enterprise level are stable solutions, with a score of nine out of ten for stability."

More IBM FlashSystem pros

Cons

"The cluster service is not available in the latest version of HPE StoreEasy."

"There are some SKUs in StoreEasy that are built to order, and there are only limited options, such as StoreEasy 1670 and 1870, which can be configured to order based on customer preferences."

"There could be improvements in providing more hardening options on the operating system side, similar to iLO's security scoreboard."

"We need some monitoring tools and it would be helpful if they were included."

"There are some SKUs in StoreEasy that are built to order, and there are only limited options, such as StoreEasy 1670 and 1870, which can be configured to order based on customer preferences."

"The support of HPE StoreEasy can improve its responsiveness. Dell support is better."

"The areas of HPE StoreEasy that need improvement are scalability and migration."

"I would like to improve the tool's technical support. I would also like to see the product's hybrid cloud version."

More HPE StoreEasy cons

"With regards to the IBM V7000 storage system, where we have multiple tiers of storage, a heat map would show I/O distribution across the tiers of storage."

"Enterprise data storage needs improvement. They should create a feature for data and file storage."

"This solution could be improved by offering greater amounts of storage."

"There is room for improvement in the troubleshooting part, specifically related to IBM Spectrum for Insight."

"The solution is not easy to use and could improve."

"They don't offer subscription-based payments."

"I would like to have a larger disk. Right now, you can get 57 terabytes in a shelf. Once they get the larger disk and you get larger capacities, it'll be even better."

"It has room for improvement in the area of stability."

More IBM FlashSystem cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten. You need to pay additional costs for the solution."

"This is an economical solution for the company and I am satisfied with the pricing."

"The price of HPE StoreEasy is approximately $15,000 to $20,000 and it is a one-time purchase. The price is similar to competitors, such as Dell."

"Based on what I hear from our customers, it is not very expensive. From the cost perspective, I see nobody complaining about its cost."

"The cost is pretty high in terms of licensing. We pay at least $100,000 USD in licensing fees for the storage."

"If five is a good price and one is a high price, I would rate the price a two or three out of five."

"For a yearly license, it is about $100,000. There are no additional costs. The entire system is included."

"Among IBM, Dell EMC, and Pure Storage, IBM is the cheapest. The price is also based on our location, the size of our entity, and our regular annual purchases from them. We are a very big IBM customer, so we normally get very high discounts. We are not a big customer of Pure Storage. We don't buy that much from Pure Storage per year. Everything is included in the price. There is no extra license for different functions."

"The cost of the IBM FlashSystem is lower than the HPE solution."

"They've been much more aggressive in the last five, six years than they were before that."

"I would rate the pricing of this solution a four out of five."

"Pricing can be considered as per market competition."

More IBM FlashSystem pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,579 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE StoreEasy?

HPE StoreEasy is competitively priced compared to competitors. It offers configuration options, such as different processor powers, to adapt to the client's needs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE StoreEasy?

The product is stable, running on Windows Server ( /products/windows-server-reviews ) with updates from HPE, including those for iLO. There could be improvements in providing more hardening options...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE StoreEasy?

I use HPE StoreEasy ( /products/hpe-storeeasy-reviews ) to provide file sharing to our business users. We are a logistics business, specifically a port.

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM FlashSystem?

It is simple to make an update.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM FlashSystem?

Many factors affect purchasing directly from IBM, often involving a multi-step process. Customers, especially in banking, often use the latest devices as they are upgrading, indicating they do not ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM FlashSystem?

The deduplication technology in IBM FlashSystem needs significant improvement. Other vendors like NetApp ( /products/netapp-41749-reviews ) offer better deduplication technology, which is noticeabl...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 52% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 27% of the time

IBM Scale-out NAS vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 8% of the time

FreeNAS vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 5% of the time

Dell PowerStore vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 4% of the time

More HPE StoreEasy Competitors

Dell PowerStore vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 22% of the time

Pure Storage FlashArray vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 8% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 8% of the time

Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 8% of the time

NetApp AFF vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM FlashSystem Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NAS

June 2025

Download HPE StoreEasy product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM FlashSystem

June 2025

Download IBM FlashSystem product report

Also Known As

HP StoreEasy

IBM Storwize

Overview

HP StoreEasy Storage is the #1 NAS product family under $15K USD range in units. Count on optimized, efficient, secure and highly available storage that simply addresses file and application storage challenges, no matter the size of your business. Straightforward features and new enhancements mean simpler installation and monitoring of utilization and health status.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

IBM FlashSystem products are enterprise computer data storage systems that store data on flash memory chips. Unlike storage systems that use standard solid-state drives, IBM FlashSystem products incorporate custom hardware based on technology from the 2012 acquisition of Texas Memory Systems. This hardware provides performance, reliability, and efficiency benefits versus competitive offerings.

IBM

Sample Customers

John Lewis, HPE IT, Comline AG, AmeriPride Services

Celero, Friedhelm Loh Group, Clarks, Mingkang Natregro Health Food Group, Sofia, Etisalat Fights Fraud, UF Health Shands Hospital, Generali, Elecon Engineering Company Limited, Ventiv , Technology, CPFL Energia, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., SciQuest, Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated, Paddy Power, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Interconnect Services, Severstal IP-Only AB, PVU Group GmbH

Buyer's Guide

HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem

June 2025

Free Report: HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,579 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.