HPE OneView vs Loom Systems comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and ServiceNow are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.5, while ServiceNow is ranked #61. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 1.2% mindshare in IM, compared to ServiceNow’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of ServiceNow users who would recommend it.

HPE OneView

Read 84 HPE OneView reviews

3,128 Views
2,846 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Loom Systems

Read 4 Loom Systems reviews

897 Views
718 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

HPE OneView

Loom Systems

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

HPE OneView and Loom Systems compete in IT management software. HPE OneView seems to have the upper hand in pricing and support, but Loom Systems stands out with its monitoring features.

Features: HPE OneView includes advanced automation, seamless integration with HPE hardware, and comprehensive infrastructure management. It enables consistent management and scalable solutions. Loom Systems specializes in AI-driven monitoring, offering predictive analytics, proactive alerting, and anomaly detection.

Room for Improvement: HPE OneView could enhance its predictive analytics capabilities and offer more flexible deployment options. Loom Systems may benefit from better integration with non-cloud environments, enhanced hardware management tools, and more competitive initial pricing strategies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE OneView provides straightforward deployment with strong integration for HPE hardware and robust customer service. Loom Systems features a cloud-based setup that focuses on quick deployment and proactive support.

Pricing and ROI: HPE OneView often presents a competitive setup cost and strong long-term ROI, especially for enterprises using HPE infrastructure. Loom Systems may involve higher initial costs but can deliver ROI through improved uptime and service efficiency, offering value through its advanced analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE OneView vs. Loom Systems Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView vs. Loom Systems

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,667 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE OneView

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

27th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Loom Systems

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

61st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anomaly Detection Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of HPE OneView is 1.2%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Loom Systems is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE OneView	1.2%
Loom Systems	0.5%
Other	98.3%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Sajith Alawwa

Sr. Systems Engineer at a media company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Efficient management and upgrades streamline complex setups

My main complaint is about the blades on the frames, which seem to have a lot of problems. We often have to call HPE for replacements, such as for memory. Constant issues arise, leading to frequent replacement of blade parts. Additionally, the upgrade process is lengthy, requiring careful planning as we cannot match ESXi versions without aligning OneView first, leading to delays.

Read full review

Keerthi Kumar Sangaraju

Technology Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Stable, easy to set up, flexible, and has multiple functionalities, but needs to define priority levels for each incident

What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's rather simple to use, and that's very important for us."

"The hardware's reliability and manageability are important criteria while selecting a vendor."

"OneView is a single pane of glass, getting everything managed and structured for us and bringing all our tools together with templates that give us speed to delivery and make a big difference."

"We are very glad, happy with it."

"HPE provides the strongest support for automation which is very important in the cloud environment."

"The automation that we get within OneView and the visibility across all of our different products are the most valuable features."

"The analytics and monitoring tools in HPE OneView are superior to other network monitoring platforms such as Nagios, and the features include multiple modules that allow you to create and write your own scripts based on your requirements for different servers such as database servers or tapping roaming servers."

"It keeps our costs down and improves the time it takes to manage our infrastructure and deploy."

More HPE OneView pros

"What I like best about Loom Systems is that you can use it for infrastructure monitoring. I also like that it's a flexible solution."

"You can develop your own apps within Loom, and they can be configured very simply."

"The RFS portion of the solution is the product's most valuable feature."

"The solution is very scalable; a company wouldn't have any issues expanding it if they needed to, and we have a few thousand users on the solution."

"The solution is absolutely scalable. If an organization needs to expand it out they definitely can."

"The solution is absolutely scalable."

"What I like best about Loom Systems is that you can use it for infrastructure monitoring and that it's a flexible solution."

"Bringing Loom in ensures that the incident process, request process, change, all of these processes are improved."

Cons

"I have to chop it up into smaller parts, because I have an installation in Europe and it covers the whole world. That is not so good. They need to be more localized, so I am going to chop it up into smaller bits."

"There is no way currently to manage the onboard storage from the servers through the OneView application."

"Integration could be improved. Sometimes OneView doesn't identify physical hardware."

"I would like to see a change in the GUI, so that you can navigate easier."

"There is a lot of automated stuff in there, but we'd like to step into the middle of that and bring in our own different tools as a part of that integration."

"The main problem that we run into, as far as stability goes, is when something loses its profile. Sometimes it requires jumping through a number of "hoops" to really get it back."

"I would like to see them improve the firmware and BIOS settings. I would like to make those a little easier to use and make it fit across more of our environments."

"The main problem that we run into, as far as stability goes, is when something loses its profile."

More HPE OneView cons

"What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority."

"The change management within the solution needs to be improved. There needs to be more process automation."

"The reporting is a bit weak. They should work to improve this aspect of the product."

"The discovery and mapping still takes a lot of human intervention, it's quite resource heavy,"

"The reporting is a bit weak."

"The discovery and mapping still takes a lot of human intervention, it's quite resource heavy, especially in the initial setup which can take six months of work, especially when you have a large estate that you're dealing with."

"The change management within the solution needs to be improved. There needs to be more process automation."

"What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the cost as six out of ten."

"When it comes to the government, money is never an issue, so it was excellent in terms of the HPE OneView licensing cost. Hitachi was cheaper, but I'd rate HPE OneView cost-wise as eight out of ten."

"HPE could lower the price."

"This license cost for OneView was $3,000 USD."

"I feel the product's price falls a bit on the higher side."

"Synergy does not require iLO licenses but servers and enclosures must be purchased."

"I am happy with the price."

"Use it. It is free."

More HPE OneView pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	51

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with HPE OneView?

From the dashboard and reporting perspective, HPE OneView could be improved by having multiple modules rather than just a single customization option.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE OneView?

The typical use case for HPE OneView addresses a shift from manual monitoring, where clients needed to log in to the server every hour. After integrating everything on HP Service Manager and HP Ope...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering HPE OneView?

Regarding the integration capabilities of HPE OneView with platforms such as VMware, SAP, or other platforms, I work for Telecom VAS servers, for SMSC, CMC, and CRB. We already have an HP team in p...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs HPE OneView

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs HPE OneView

Compared 9% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs HPE OneView

Compared 6% of the time

Dell CloudIQ vs HPE OneView

Compared 6% of the time

Zabbix vs HPE OneView

Compared 4% of the time

More HPE OneView Competitors

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Loom Systems

Compared 19% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Loom Systems

Compared 13% of the time

OpsRamp vs Loom Systems

Compared 13% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Loom Systems

Compared 12% of the time

BigPanda vs Loom Systems

Compared 10% of the time

More Loom Systems Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView

March 2026

Download HPE OneView product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

March 2026

Download Loom Systems product report

Also Known As

HP OneView

No data available

Overview

HPE OneView is your infrastructure automation engine to simplify operations, increasing the speed of IT delivery for new applications and services. Through software defined intelligence, HPE OneView brings a new level of automation to infrastructure management by taking a template driven approach to provisioning, updating, and integrating compute, storage, and networking infrastructure. Designed with a modern, standard-based API and supported by a large and growing partner ecosystem, HPE OneView also makes it easy to integrate powerful infrastructure automation into existing IT tools and processes. Take command with HPE OneView to deploy infrastructure faster, simplify operations and increase productivity.

HPE OneView innovations provide you the industry’s best infrastructure management experience, simplifying operations for HPE BladeSystem, HPE ProLiant servers, 3PAR storage, HPE Networking and HPE ConvergedSystems.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Loom Systems delivers an advanced AI-powered operational analytics platform to predict and prevent problems in the digital business. DevOps & IT teams use Loom for real-time detection and resolution for any type of application, including home-grown. Loom analyzes logs and metrics in all formats, performs smart correlations and root cause analysis to help organizations gain immediate into their environments. Loom stands alone in the industry as an AI platform requiring no prior math knowledge from its operators, leveraging your existing staff to succeed in the digital era. Getting started is easy - zero configuration and data pre-processing needed, so you can stream your data in its raw format.

ServiceNow

Sample Customers

Asante, ITS Nordics, Columbus Communications, Mansfield Oil

Citrix, Amdocs, Sysaid, Hexaware, Effibar, Revtrak, Taptica

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView vs. Loom Systems

March 2026

Free Report: HPE OneView vs. Loom Systems

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE OneView vs. Loom Systems and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE OneView vs. Loom Systems report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.