HPE OneView vs Loom Systems comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and ServiceNow are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.7, while ServiceNow is ranked #65. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 1.1% mindshare in IM, compared to ServiceNow’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of ServiceNow users who would recommend it.

HPE OneView

Read 84 HPE OneView reviews

5,386 Views
4,955 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Loom Systems

Read 4 Loom Systems reviews

1,657 Views
1,458 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

HPE OneView

Loom Systems

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

HPE OneView and Loom Systems compete in IT management software. HPE OneView seems to have the upper hand in pricing and support, but Loom Systems stands out with its monitoring features.

Features: HPE OneView includes advanced automation, seamless integration with HPE hardware, and comprehensive infrastructure management. It enables consistent management and scalable solutions. Loom Systems specializes in AI-driven monitoring, offering predictive analytics, proactive alerting, and anomaly detection.

Room for Improvement: HPE OneView could enhance its predictive analytics capabilities and offer more flexible deployment options. Loom Systems may benefit from better integration with non-cloud environments, enhanced hardware management tools, and more competitive initial pricing strategies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE OneView provides straightforward deployment with strong integration for HPE hardware and robust customer service. Loom Systems features a cloud-based setup that focuses on quick deployment and proactive support.

Pricing and ROI: HPE OneView often presents a competitive setup cost and strong long-term ROI, especially for enterprises using HPE infrastructure. Loom Systems may involve higher initial costs but can deliver ROI through improved uptime and service efficiency, offering value through its advanced analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE OneView vs. Loom Systems Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView vs. Loom Systems

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,948 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE OneView

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Loom Systems

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

65th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anomaly Detection Tools (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of HPE OneView is 1.1%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Loom Systems is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE OneView	1.1%
Loom Systems	0.5%
Other	98.4%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Kapil Pandey

Technology Management Consultant at National Institute for Smart Government - NISG

Gaining seamless monitoring and customization capabilities

One of the best features of HPE OneView is that you get a complete architecture with a single click. The analytics and monitoring tools in HPE OneView are superior to other network monitoring platforms such as Nagios. The features include multiple modules that allow you to create and write your own scripts based on your requirements for different servers such as database servers or tapping roaming servers. There is more feasibility when using HP Service Manager because, unlike other tools with predefined standards for script writing, we have the option for customization as per our choice, and dashboard reports can be customized.

Read full review

Keerthi Kumar Sangaraju

Technology Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Stable, easy to set up, flexible, and has multiple functionalities, but needs to define priority levels for each incident

What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Comprehensive dashboard, ease of use are key features."

"The ease of installation and use help you to come up with a turnkey solution as quickly as possible."

"When we're looking at vendors we look for the product itself and innovation."

"Overall, the product is very good."

"The most valuable features of HPE OneView are environment monitoring, the ease of firmware upgrade, and the ability to manage all the servers and the infrastructure from one team."

"The time that we have saved on hardware configuration and reconfiguration, both on the operations and engineering sides, would definitely pay for the product."

"The automation allows a complete implementation of a server with an operating system from start to finish by providing playbooks using the Rest API, and codes, from Ansible and using them towards the solution."

"I like the ability that we can manage multiple enclosures within OneView; it's like one stop shopping where you can manage all the server profiles and do everything from a blade enclosure standpoint using OneView."

More HPE OneView pros

"The solution is absolutely scalable."

"The RFS portion of the solution is the product's most valuable feature."

"Bringing Loom in ensures that the incident process, request process, change, all of these processes are improved."

"The solution is absolutely scalable. If an organization needs to expand it out they definitely can."

"What I like best about Loom Systems is that you can use it for infrastructure monitoring. I also like that it's a flexible solution."

"The solution is very scalable; a company wouldn't have any issues expanding it if they needed to, and we have a few thousand users on the solution."

"You can develop your own apps within Loom, and they can be configured very simply."

Cons

"Does not allow for switch configuration other than through OneView."

"They can improve reporting and provide more customized reports. Currently, reporting is a bit limited. It can be complex to learn and manage for beginners. Because of my experience, I find it comfortable to manage, which might not be the case with beginners. It would be good if they can make it a little bit easier to understand. They can provide a more graphical view of connectivity and other things. Their technical support can also be improved."

"The logs are not proper."

"It's a nice product. It's a little slow sometimes."

"There is a lot of automated stuff in there, but we'd like to step into the middle of that and bring in our own different tools as a part of that integration."

"We ran into a couple of issues here and there with the baselines for the firmware and not having enough space on the appliance itself to be able to have more than two baselines."

"Version 1.0 was ridiculous. The setup was way too complex compared to iLO, Onboard Administrator, Virtual Connect Manager."

"I hate to say, not a lot. It's encouraging to see a couple of features in version 4 that we think ought to have been there from the start."

More HPE OneView cons

"What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority."

"What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident."

"The reporting is a bit weak. They should work to improve this aspect of the product."

"The change management within the solution needs to be improved. There needs to be more process automation."

"The reporting is a bit weak."

"The discovery and mapping still takes a lot of human intervention, it's quite resource heavy, especially in the initial setup which can take six months of work, especially when you have a large estate that you're dealing with."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think that the price of OneView is $500 USD per server, which is a little high."

"When it comes to the government, money is never an issue, so it was excellent in terms of the HPE OneView licensing cost. Hitachi was cheaper, but I'd rate HPE OneView cost-wise as eight out of ten."

"I feel the product's price falls a bit on the higher side."

"HPE could lower the price."

"The solution is free to use, but if you want the management aspect you require a virtual machine such as C7000 or Synergy which require licenses."

"HPE had some other solutions, but they were actually quite expensive to buy. So, when OneView came along, it was kind of reasonable in terms of price for licenses, etc."

"Use it. It is free."

"Synergy does not require iLO licenses but servers and enclosures must be purchased."

More HPE OneView pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	51

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with HPE OneView?

From the dashboard and reporting perspective, HPE OneView could be improved by having multiple modules rather than just a single customization option.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE OneView?

The typical use case for HPE OneView addresses a shift from manual monitoring, where clients needed to log in to the server every hour. After integrating everything on HP Service Manager and HP Ope...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering HPE OneView?

Regarding the integration capabilities of HPE OneView with platforms such as VMware, SAP, or other platforms, I work for Telecom VAS servers, for SMSC, CMC, and CRB. We already have an HP team in p...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs HPE OneView

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs HPE OneView

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco UCS Manager vs HPE OneView

Compared 6% of the time

Dell CloudIQ vs HPE OneView

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs HPE OneView

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE OneView Competitors

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Loom Systems

Compared 15% of the time

Moogsoft vs Loom Systems

Compared 12% of the time

OpsRamp vs Loom Systems

Compared 9% of the time

BigPanda vs Loom Systems

Compared 8% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Loom Systems

Compared 7% of the time

More Loom Systems Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView

August 2026

Download HPE OneView product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

July 2026

Download Loom Systems product report

Also Known As

HP OneView

No data available

Overview

HPE OneView offers a centralized platform for managing IT infrastructure with ease, emphasizing automation and reducing errors. Its integrated approach provides users unified control over storage, compute, and network management.

HPE OneView delivers comprehensive infrastructure visibility and effective monitoring through a user-friendly interface. Automation, real-time alerts, and quick server deployment enhance operational efficiency. Seamless integration and profile templates further streamline workflows. Despite its strengths, some users seek improved navigation, faster response times, and extended platform support. Enhanced reporting and support for older hardware models are desirable.

What key features make HPE OneView valuable?

Single Pane of Glass: Centralized management across IT infrastructure.
Automation: Streamlines processes and reduces deployment times.
Real-Time Alerts: Provides timely notifications for proactive management.
User-Friendly Interface: Enhances ease of use and reduces training time.
Profile Templates: Simplifies configuration for consistent deployments.
Unified Console: Supports storage, compute, and network management seamlessly.

What ROI should users consider when evaluating HPE OneView?

Efficiency Gains: Automation reduces manual effort and errors.
Improved Monitoring: Centralized alerts ensure quick issue resolution.
Deployment Speed: Faster setup times for IT resources.
Integration Benefits: Seamless connections with virtualization platforms enhance workflows.
Cost Reduction: Streamlined operations lower operational expenses.

Companies leverage HPE OneView across sectors such as finance, telecom, and government, utilizing its capabilities for unified monitoring, management, and configuration. It's implemented on-premises and as a hybrid cloud management interface, supporting environments like Synergy and VMware. By integrating with virtualization platforms, it advances hardware, firmware, and network management efficiency, significantly reducing manual processes.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Loom Systems is recognized for its flexibility in RFS and infrastructure monitoring, catering to IT service management. It aids in app creation and configuration, particularly useful for incident management and service desk operations.

Offering user-friendly functionality throughout the software development lifecycle, Loom Systems is valued for its adaptable capabilities in creating tailored implementations. While features like change and configuration management can be challenging, Loom Systems still stands out for its ease of use. Its platform, though resource-intensive initially, integrates with other tools, supporting IT challenges like automation and root cause analysis.

What are the key features of Loom Systems?

RFS Flexibility: Provides adaptable RFS options tailored to varied monitoring needs.
Infrastructure Monitoring: Allows comprehensive monitoring of IT infrastructure.
App Creation Platform: Facilitates easy development of customized applications.
Change Management: Though challenging, its management capabilities are integral.
Integration Capabilities: Supports integration with existing tools for seamless operation.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Enhanced IT Service Management: Facilitates efficient management of incident requests and problem resolution.
Versatile Use Cases: Supports diverse functions from asset management to security and HR modules.
Automation and Ease of Use: Simplifies deployment and migration processes while enabling automation.
Adaptable Implementations: Offers flexibility for custom solutions catering to enterprise needs.
Scalability: Suitable for medium to large enterprises with support for expansion.

In specific industries, Loom Systems is deployed predominantly for IT service management, asset management, and incident management. Medium to large enterprises use it for tasks such as implementation and automation, with additional security and HR capabilities. While smaller enterprises might consider cost, its robust features make it a preferred choice for IT tasks.

ServiceNow

Sample Customers

Asante, ITS Nordics, Columbus Communications, Mansfield Oil

Citrix, Amdocs, Sysaid, Hexaware, Effibar, Revtrak, Taptica

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView vs. Loom Systems

August 2026

Free Report: HPE OneView vs. Loom Systems

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE OneView vs. Loom Systems and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE OneView vs. Loom Systems report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.