HPE OneView vs Loom Systems comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and ServiceNow are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.4, while ServiceNow is ranked #63. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 1.4% mindshare in IM, compared to ServiceNow’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of ServiceNow users who would recommend it.

HPE OneView

Read 84 HPE OneView reviews

2,126 Views
1,913 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Loom Systems

Read 4 Loom Systems reviews

554 Views
355 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

HPE OneView

Loom Systems

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

HPE OneView and Loom Systems compete in IT management software. HPE OneView seems to have the upper hand in pricing and support, but Loom Systems stands out with its monitoring features.

Features: HPE OneView includes advanced automation, seamless integration with HPE hardware, and comprehensive infrastructure management. It enables consistent management and scalable solutions. Loom Systems specializes in AI-driven monitoring, offering predictive analytics, proactive alerting, and anomaly detection.

Room for Improvement: HPE OneView could enhance its predictive analytics capabilities and offer more flexible deployment options. Loom Systems may benefit from better integration with non-cloud environments, enhanced hardware management tools, and more competitive initial pricing strategies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE OneView provides straightforward deployment with strong integration for HPE hardware and robust customer service. Loom Systems features a cloud-based setup that focuses on quick deployment and proactive support.

Pricing and ROI: HPE OneView often presents a competitive setup cost and strong long-term ROI, especially for enterprises using HPE infrastructure. Loom Systems may involve higher initial costs but can deliver ROI through improved uptime and service efficiency, offering value through its advanced analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE OneView vs. Loom Systems Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView vs. Loom Systems

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,771 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE OneView

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Loom Systems

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

63rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anomaly Detection Tools (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of HPE OneView is 1.4%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Loom Systems is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HPE OneView	1.4%
Loom Systems	0.3%
Other	98.3%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Kapil Pandey

Technology Management Consultant at National Institute for Smart Government - NISG

Gaining seamless monitoring and customization capabilities

One of the best features of HPE OneView is that you get a complete architecture with a single click. The analytics and monitoring tools in HPE OneView are superior to other network monitoring platforms such as Nagios. The features include multiple modules that allow you to create and write your own scripts based on your requirements for different servers such as database servers or tapping roaming servers. There is more feasibility when using HP Service Manager because, unlike other tools with predefined standards for script writing, we have the option for customization as per our choice, and dashboard reports can be customized.

Read full review

Keerthi Kumar Sangaraju

Technology Manager at FIS

Stable, easy to set up, flexible, and has multiple functionalities, but needs to define priority levels for each incident

What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The hypervisor and cluster profiles make it easy to integrate with VMware."

"The stability is very good. I have never had an issue with it over the three years that I have been using it."

"We also have the 3PAR and the GUI is almost the same. So the recognition is very good."

"The most valuable features are the composable structure, infrastructure, and automation."

"Comprehensive dashboard, ease of use are key features."

"Profile templates: The ability to generate the profiles and lay them down so the servers are built consistently. I would say that's probably the biggest piece of it."

"The solution's technical support was great...The initial setup of HPE OneView was easy."

"If you have a lot of devices, like we do, then you have to have one single pane of view, otherwise we lose too much time. So, we needed this type of solution."

More HPE OneView pros

"The solution is absolutely scalable. If an organization needs to expand it out they definitely can."

"You can develop your own apps within Loom, and they can be configured very simply."

"What I like best about Loom Systems is that you can use it for infrastructure monitoring. I also like that it's a flexible solution."

"The RFS portion of the solution is the product's most valuable feature."

Cons

"HPE OneView should be able to cover more device models apart from ProLiant and Synergy."

"I believe the prices of HPE OneView should be reduced, as it is quite expensive."

"The speed and performance of the solution are areas where the product lacks and needs improvement."

"The interface is a bit bland. It does its job, but it could have a better interface."

"The solution's console can be improved by making it more user-friendly and adding the capability to filter the reports out using only the information required."

"Use it, but do not think it is going into the clouds, because it is not. There is room for improvement."

"From the dashboard and reporting perspective, HPE OneView could be improved by having multiple modules rather than just a single customization option."

"I have to chop it up into smaller parts, because I have an installation in Europe and it covers the whole world. That is not so good. They need to be more localized, so I am going to chop it up into smaller bits."

More HPE OneView cons

"The change management within the solution needs to be improved. There needs to be more process automation."

"What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority."

"The reporting is a bit weak. They should work to improve this aspect of the product."

"The discovery and mapping still takes a lot of human intervention, it's quite resource heavy,"

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think that the price of OneView is $500 USD per server, which is a little high."

"When it comes to the government, money is never an issue, so it was excellent in terms of the HPE OneView licensing cost. Hitachi was cheaper, but I'd rate HPE OneView cost-wise as eight out of ten."

"I am happy with the price."

"This license cost for OneView was $3,000 USD."

"The solution is free to use, but if you want the management aspect you require a virtual machine such as C7000 or Synergy which require licenses."

"Synergy does not require iLO licenses but servers and enclosures must be purchased."

"HPE had some other solutions, but they were actually quite expensive to buy. So, when OneView came along, it was kind of reasonable in terms of price for licenses, etc."

"I feel the product's price falls a bit on the higher side."

More HPE OneView pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	51

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HPE OneView?

The most valuable features of HPE OneView are environment monitoring, the ease of firmware upgrade, and the ability to manage all the servers and the infrastructure from one team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE OneView?

From the dashboard and reporting perspective, HPE OneView could be improved by having multiple modules rather than just a single customization option.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE OneView?

The typical use case for HPE OneView addresses a shift from manual monitoring, where clients needed to log in to the server every hour. After integrating everything on HP Service Manager and HP Ope...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Dell CloudIQ vs HPE OneView

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs HPE OneView

Compared 14% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs HPE OneView

Compared 11% of the time

Zabbix vs HPE OneView

Compared 10% of the time

Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator vs HPE OneView

Compared 8% of the time

More HPE OneView Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Loom Systems

Compared 36% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Loom Systems

Compared 32% of the time

Huawei eSight vs Loom Systems

Compared 32% of the time

More Loom Systems Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView

October 2025

Download HPE OneView product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

October 2025

Download Loom Systems product report

Also Known As

HP OneView

No data available

Overview

HPE OneView is your infrastructure automation engine to simplify operations, increasing the speed of IT delivery for new applications and services. Through software defined intelligence, HPE OneView brings a new level of automation to infrastructure management by taking a template driven approach to provisioning, updating, and integrating compute, storage, and networking infrastructure. Designed with a modern, standard-based API and supported by a large and growing partner ecosystem, HPE OneView also makes it easy to integrate powerful infrastructure automation into existing IT tools and processes. Take command with HPE OneView to deploy infrastructure faster, simplify operations and increase productivity.

HPE OneView innovations provide you the industry’s best infrastructure management experience, simplifying operations for HPE BladeSystem, HPE ProLiant servers, 3PAR storage, HPE Networking and HPE ConvergedSystems.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Loom Systems delivers an advanced AI-powered operational analytics platform to predict and prevent problems in the digital business. DevOps & IT teams use Loom for real-time detection and resolution for any type of application, including home-grown. Loom analyzes logs and metrics in all formats, performs smart correlations and root cause analysis to help organizations gain immediate into their environments. Loom stands alone in the industry as an AI platform requiring no prior math knowledge from its operators, leveraging your existing staff to succeed in the digital era. Getting started is easy - zero configuration and data pre-processing needed, so you can stream your data in its raw format.

ServiceNow

Sample Customers

Asante, ITS Nordics, Columbus Communications, Mansfield Oil

Citrix, Amdocs, Sysaid, Hexaware, Effibar, Revtrak, Taptica

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView vs. Loom Systems

September 2025

Free Report: HPE OneView vs. Loom Systems

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE OneView vs. Loom Systems and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE OneView vs. Loom Systems report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.