HPE OneView vs Infraon IMS comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and EverestIMS are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.7, while EverestIMS is ranked #56. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 1.1% mindshare in IM, compared to EverestIMS’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of EverestIMS users who would recommend it.

HPE OneView

Read 84 HPE OneView reviews

5,066 Views
4,661 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Infraon IMS

Read 8 Infraon IMS reviews

2,997 Views
1,918 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE OneView

Infraon IMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

HPE OneView and Infraon IMS compete in the infrastructure management category, each offering distinct advantages. Infraon IMS appears to have an edge in pricing flexibility and user satisfaction with technical support.

Features: HPE OneView streamlines automation tasks such as VLAN additions, providing centralized management for servers, storage, and switches from a single interface. It offers comprehensive visibility and can manage various environments without requiring deep hybrid IT expertise. Infraon IMS focuses on granular monitoring for detailed infrastructure insights, offering customizable dashboards and detailed analytics tailored to user roles.

Room for Improvement: HPE OneView could enhance its real-time analytics, integration with non-HPE components, and offer improved reporting. Users seek better firmware and BIOS settings management and more flexible monitoring customization. Infraon IMS would benefit from advanced AI-driven features, GUI upgrades, and streamlined ticketing, with better integration for more operational systems and enhanced role management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both HPE OneView and Infraon IMS are mainly deployed on-premises, with options for hybrid cloud deployment. Users report variable experiences with technical support for both; HPE OneView's support lacks consistency, while Infraon IMS generally receives positive feedback, though complex issues sometimes require escalation.

Pricing and ROI: HPE OneView's higher pricing includes additional costs for management features and support, though some users justify the ROI due to time savings. Infraon IMS presents a flexible pricing model based on specific features, making it cost-effective for targeted needs. Users commend Infraon for its competitive pricing, which adapts to different organizational requirements, resulting in a strong ROI perception.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE OneView vs. Infraon IMS Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView vs. Infraon IMS

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE OneView

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Infraon IMS

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

56th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (83rd), Server Monitoring (32nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (48th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of HPE OneView is 1.1%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infraon IMS is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE OneView	1.1%
Infraon IMS	0.8%
Other	98.1%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Kapil Pandey

Technology Management Consultant at National Institute for Smart Government - NISG

Gaining seamless monitoring and customization capabilities

One of the best features of HPE OneView is that you get a complete architecture with a single click. The analytics and monitoring tools in HPE OneView are superior to other network monitoring platforms such as Nagios. The features include multiple modules that allow you to create and write your own scripts based on your requirements for different servers such as database servers or tapping roaming servers. There is more feasibility when using HP Service Manager because, unlike other tools with predefined standards for script writing, we have the option for customization as per our choice, and dashboard reports can be customized.

Read full review

it_user1631601

GTM Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Our process efficiency has improved by having all the information in one place, which has reduced manpower

The product is great. We integrated the ticketing tool with the monitoring tool. The agent ID creation is very easy when using this tool. It is so user-friendly. The user interface is good and also the pricing is great. The user interface is good, even a business user or layman can raise a ticket. They provide an all-in-one monitoring tool. If an issue happens, it gets integrated with the email, then proactively that ticket is being raised, which is good. The reporting is good. It is very clear. It is a customized report; however you want it, you can customize it. We use the solution’s role-based dashboards. The head of IT wants to use it so he can see holistically what is happening, e.g., what are the tickets being raised, what is a major issue, and what escalations are happening. There are different dashboards that are customized. For our head of IT, we made a separate dashboard. Then, for the executives, we made a separate dashboard based on time, like hourly or daily. All these reports were customized. While they didn't provide a BI dashboard, they provide a kind of graphical dashboard for whatever the issue is. Once you click on a particular ticket, it drills down to the issue, what it is and when the issue was raised. The drill down is good. It is more like a business intelligence (BI) tool. You can just scroll and zoom in. It goes deep into the issue. Once you click a particular dashboard, it will take you to the next page, then it takes you to the issue. Infraon IMS provides workflow automation for real-world use cases. This makes our work easier. It is just drag and drop (no coding) to build the workflows. For example, a particular ticket is being raised. It gets routed to three important IT executives within our team. From our team, it gets routed to the next level. The learning curve is good. Initially, there were no issues. As soon as the users saw the product, they understood what the product was. There wasn't any kind of training required for this product because it is very straightforward.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is really stable."

"I definitely recommend OneView; if you are an HPE shop, it's the way of the future."

"We have the dashboard up on a big screen, and you can actually see when things go wrong or if there are any faults with any of the servers. The backup is automated as well, so the appliance is quite good."

"Scalability is probably the biggest influence for choosing OneView, as it doesn't matter if you're trying to manage 10 servers or 10,000 servers."

"Places all of your different HPE products in one place, all in the circles where you can just get everything into nice, easy-to-use silos pretty easily."

"OneView is a nice choice: It is visually appealing, easy to use, easy for managing servers going forward, and easy for building servers at a profile level, versus going in traditionally and configuring all that stuff, because it can automate all that stuff."

"First, that it’s simple; it saves me time and is easy to use, releases stress for me, and since I’m working with federal law, I really need to make sure that all of my customers and their data are protected properly."

"Overall, OneView is a fantastic replacement for Virtual Connect Manager and it's a fantastic replacement for Insight Manager."

More HPE OneView pros

"The feature that I like the most and the best part is the customization."

"Our response time is within 30 minutes for any support. This solution provides alerts immediately, so we are within our SLA, giving efficiency to our support."

"With Infraon, everything is already built-in so you are able to plug-and-play with the system."

"It is a stable product; after the initial configuration, you don't have to tweak it much, and all systems of Everest IMS work perfectly."

"The backup, restore, and comparison features are all good."

"Being an engineering product, the customization is easy for us compared to SolarWinds and ManageEngine."

"The role-based dashboards provide data points and charts and topology diagrams in a single window. It's like a spider web, where the application, connectivity, and everything is defined for each user of those applications."

"We use the solution to automatically trigger processes to help us resolve issues. The whole IT process has been automated, such as trying to map all the users and the escalation process. So, if any issue happens, we get an SMS and WhatsApp of the report. If there is a critical issue this has to be sorted out, like the entire data center being down, then there is an alarm."

More Infraon IMS pros

Cons

"Integration could be improved. Sometimes OneView doesn't identify physical hardware."

"We've had issues, for example, with RAM."

"Does not allow for switch configuration other than through OneView."

"HPE OneView should be able to cover more device models apart from ProLiant and Synergy."

"We have different operations teams managing the servers. It should be segregated more in terms of which operation team is managing which group of servers."

"We've had a few issues. We just upgraded to the 3.9.0 version. We think that now that we are on that version, hopefully a lot of those things are going to go away for us."

"I don’t like HP support very much, as they tend to transfer me to random places that don’t help me very much."

"The older platform requires iLO licenses but does not require the purchase of servers. This platform has problems because it is dependent on old class enclosures and hardware that cannot link or be managed with the solution."

More HPE OneView cons

"There might be some features in other products that are currently not there in Everest IMS and can be included. I have not yet compared it with any other product."

"Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time."

"We have enquired if there are any possibilities of monitoring non-IPBS devices."

"Technical support could use some improvement in terms of their response times and diagnostic accuracy."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets."

"I would like to have the option to add a new device or meet with the next release. Right now, it needs to be done from the backend which results in a heavy reliance on R&D."

"The GUI is in need of improvement. It is not drag-and-drop or easy to use."

"The graphical view of the topology does not show us all of the connectivity in our network, which is something that could be improved."

More Infraon IMS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I feel the product's price falls a bit on the higher side."

"I am happy with the price."

"When it comes to the government, money is never an issue, so it was excellent in terms of the HPE OneView licensing cost. Hitachi was cheaper, but I'd rate HPE OneView cost-wise as eight out of ten."

"Synergy does not require iLO licenses but servers and enclosures must be purchased."

"The solution is free to use, but if you want the management aspect you require a virtual machine such as C7000 or Synergy which require licenses."

"This license cost for OneView was $3,000 USD."

"I would rate the cost as six out of ten."

"Use it. It is free."

More HPE OneView pricing and cost advice

"I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."

"The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."

"We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."

"Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."

"The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	51

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with HPE OneView?

From the dashboard and reporting perspective, HPE OneView could be improved by having multiple modules rather than just a single customization option.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE OneView?

The typical use case for HPE OneView addresses a shift from manual monitoring, where clients needed to log in to the server every hour. After integrating everything on HP Service Manager and HP Ope...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering HPE OneView?

Regarding the integration capabilities of HPE OneView with platforms such as VMware, SAP, or other platforms, I work for Telecom VAS servers, for SMSC, CMC, and CRB. We already have an HP team in p...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...

See all answers

Comparisons

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs HPE OneView

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs HPE OneView

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco UCS Manager vs HPE OneView

Compared 6% of the time

Dell CloudIQ vs HPE OneView

Compared 5% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs HPE OneView

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE OneView Competitors

Nagios XI vs Infraon IMS

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs Infraon IMS

Compared 8% of the time

Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS

Compared 5% of the time

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs Infraon IMS

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs Infraon IMS

Compared 3% of the time

More Infraon IMS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView

June 2026

Download HPE OneView product report

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS

June 2026

Download Infraon IMS product report

Also Known As

HP OneView

Everest IMS

Overview

HPE OneView offers a centralized platform for managing IT infrastructure with ease, emphasizing automation and reducing errors. Its integrated approach provides users unified control over storage, compute, and network management.

HPE OneView delivers comprehensive infrastructure visibility and effective monitoring through a user-friendly interface. Automation, real-time alerts, and quick server deployment enhance operational efficiency. Seamless integration and profile templates further streamline workflows. Despite its strengths, some users seek improved navigation, faster response times, and extended platform support. Enhanced reporting and support for older hardware models are desirable.

What key features make HPE OneView valuable?

Single Pane of Glass: Centralized management across IT infrastructure.
Automation: Streamlines processes and reduces deployment times.
Real-Time Alerts: Provides timely notifications for proactive management.
User-Friendly Interface: Enhances ease of use and reduces training time.
Profile Templates: Simplifies configuration for consistent deployments.
Unified Console: Supports storage, compute, and network management seamlessly.

What ROI should users consider when evaluating HPE OneView?

Efficiency Gains: Automation reduces manual effort and errors.
Improved Monitoring: Centralized alerts ensure quick issue resolution.
Deployment Speed: Faster setup times for IT resources.
Integration Benefits: Seamless connections with virtualization platforms enhance workflows.
Cost Reduction: Streamlined operations lower operational expenses.

Companies leverage HPE OneView across sectors such as finance, telecom, and government, utilizing its capabilities for unified monitoring, management, and configuration. It's implemented on-premises and as a hybrid cloud management interface, supporting environments like Synergy and VMware. By integrating with virtualization platforms, it advances hardware, firmware, and network management efficiency, significantly reducing manual processes.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Infraon IMS offers network monitoring with real-time dashboards, customizable GUIs, and integrated tools, supporting device management and workflow automation efficiently.

Infraon IMS delivers stable performance with features tailored for easy customization and detailed network management. Users benefit from real-time monitoring through role-based dashboards and integrated ticketing tools. However, improvements in reporting, GUI usability, and AI integration are needed. Challenges include monitoring non-IPBS devices and improving connectivity visibility. Users require seamless Infraon Desk integration, ease of device addition, and enhanced topology views.

What are the key features of Infraon IMS?

Stable Performance: Provides consistent network oversight.
Customizable Dashboards: Role-based, interactive GUIs for tailored views.
Real-Time Monitoring: Comprehensive network visibility and alerts.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines operational processes.
Configuration Backup: Ensures data integrity and easy recovery.
Granular Reporting: Delivers detailed insights and analysis.
Intuitive Interface: Enhances user interaction and experience.
Quick Device Discovery: Facilitates effective network management.
Email Alerts: Keeps users informed on device status.
CSV Upload: Manages high-volume device data efficiently.

What benefits do users find in Infraon IMS?

Centralized Access: Simplifies firewall and device management.
Enhanced IT Management: Improved monitoring of uptime, downtime, and utilization.
Flexible Deployment: Support for global locations with cloud and on-premises options.
Link Monitoring Automation: Boosts operational efficiency.

In industries like IT infrastructure and data center management, Infraon IMS is utilized for network monitoring and managing key components such as leased lines and firewalls. Its capabilities aid diverse geographical locations in overseeing data centers, offering centralized monitoring and access to critical infrastructure.

EverestIMS

Sample Customers

Asante, ITS Nordics, Columbus Communications, Mansfield Oil

Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc.

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView vs. Infraon IMS

June 2026

Free Report: HPE OneView vs. Infraon IMS

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE OneView vs. Infraon IMS and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE OneView vs. Infraon IMS report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.