No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

HP Anywhere vs Tulip comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

HP Anywhere
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
122nd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tulip
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the AWS Marketplace category, the mindshare of HP Anywhere is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tulip is 0.2%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AWS Marketplace Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Tulip0.2%
HP Anywhere0.2%
Other99.6%
AWS Marketplace
 

Featured Reviews

Esther Sultaana - PeerSpot reviewer
Storage Consultant Storage at Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Secure remote imaging has transformed global workflows and supports high‑performance creative work
HP Anywhere is utilized across public cloud, private cloud, hybrid cloud, and on-premises environments. AWS is the cloud provider I see HP Anywhere deployed with most often, although I have also seen it a bit with Azure, but not at all with Google Cloud. Regarding improvements, I appreciate that the AI focuses on bandwidth optimization and security anomalies, and it offers valuable information on pixel streaming for smoother remote access. For those considering HP Anywhere, I advise recognizing that the product is at end of life, with no future developments, and if you are looking for VDIs, alternatives such as Citrix or Nvidia may be better. If you already have HP Anywhere, be aware it has been officially discontinued. HP Anywhere is a wonderful remote desktop solution, but HP has chosen not to enhance it further. If you possess it, it remains a good tool, but it is important to acknowledge that it is at end of life with no future development planned, meaning customers will need to eventually transition to other remote desktop environments. I give this product a rating of eight out of ten.
Prathamesh Kakde - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Software Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Digital workflows have replaced paper on the shop floor and speed up regulated manufacturing
Definitely, AI in a regulated industry is something that is a concern of the clients. However, Tulip can stick to 21 CFR Part 11 strictly when it comes to Tulip's AI capabilities. Tulip has already started to look forward to compliance-related things. For example, Tulip's AI widget offers data reading throughout the site. It does not allow any AI to interact with external systems when we apply firewalls on it. In this regard, if Tulip continues in that way, they can definitely stick to the governance and security. As of now, I didn't face any issue related to their AI capabilities. It is working fine but not accurate, which is a red flag in a GXP regulated system. This is my feedback on their AI capabilities. This has been introduced into the latest LTS version and needs more hands-on experience. Before that, I cannot give a direct justification or feedback on their AI capabilities being reliable and accurate. However, at the extent that I have used them, they are accurate and reliable as of now. Tulip is an emerging platform and being a cloud-native MES, it has a lot to improve. According to me, traditional MES like FactoryTalk PharmaSuite has more complex features and user-oriented use cases and complexities that the application itself handles. However, when it comes to Tulip, all the things that matter are in the hands of a developer. That is something that Tulip can improve on. Tulip can switch to a traditional way of delivering in the pharmaceutical industry while keeping the cloud-native impact intact. One improvement that I can give an example of is that Tulip has application templates. Instead of templates, they can offer concrete applications to their pharmaceutical or any specific industrial client for their specific needs, such as a recipe designer and production management for a pharmaceutical client. Then production or material tracking or BOM tracking for a discrete client. In that way, I can see an improvement where Tulip can perform well.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"HP Anywhere has positively impacted my organization by providing global support and compatibility with any cloud provider, including AWS, Azure, Google, and private clouds, enhancing hybrid workforces and allowing employees to work anywhere."
"This flexibility and ability to adjust things have led to measurable improvements in our projects, particularly in terms of time saved and user satisfaction."
"Tulip is really about empowering people to build applications, and those people who build the applications are not necessarily only technical experts or developers."
"What has really improved is the time taken to develop and deploy applications, as we save many work weeks in the development phase and have shortened the process compared to the conventional way of programming, while also saving time for operators and improving data accuracy."
"Since using Tulip, my organization has positively transitioned from a lot of manual documentation for GMP compliance to digital, significantly reducing paperwork and now maintaining data retention within Tulip instead of manually."
"The best features Tulip offers are the low or no code features that enable users with no programming background to work on and build applications."
"Tulip is a pre-configured tool where all fields and options are readily available on the Tulip platform, which impressed me when I evaluated it from a CSV perspective and development perspective."
"One of the best features that Tulip offers is having a bunch of connections with third-party tools such as ERPs and specific quality tools, just to have correct traceability of what is the concern about one client or something similar."
"In a general sense, I can say a client saves 60 to 70 percent when it comes to Tulip compared to the traditional MES when it comes to money."
 

Cons

"HP Anywhere is at the end of life, with no new features or support being added, and it seems like HP is not prioritizing its development anymore in the growing remote work market."
"One area Tulip can be improved is addressing the issue that arises when multiple users use the same data tables for Tulip applications."
"Tulip can improve with better or closer support in developing the applications, especially when we as a pharmaceutical company would have our specific requirements and needs that are mandatory for our industry."
"Tulip can improve by providing additional features developers can use in the application."
"For complex applications, Tulip is not equipped well as of now."
"Tulip can be improved to have a lower entry point."
"In terms of integration and analytics, I do not see any other special features that Tulip provides that other modern market solutions do not provide, such as Ignition, Siemens Opcenter, and many other applications."
"Regarding the needed improvements for Tulip, regarding integration that you mentioned, because you have a bunch of features of third-party connections, it is not enough."
"Regarding Tulip's AI capabilities, I perceive that it is not yet mature and is still in the testing phase, with several features rolled out for end users."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
33%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Transportation Company
6%
Educational Organization
5%
Construction Company
23%
Healthcare Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HP Anywhere?
My experience with pricing and licensing for HP Anywhere has been generally positive. The licensing model is straightforward and easy to manage. While the solution may not be the lowest-cost option...
What needs improvement with HP Anywhere?
One area for improvement in HP Anywhere would be simplifying the initial setup and configuration process for new users. Better documentation and more self-service troubleshooting options would also...
What is your primary use case for HP Anywhere?
My main use case for HP Anywhere is secure remote access to office systems and applications. It helps employees work from anywhere while maintaining security and productivity. In my daily work, I u...
What needs improvement with Tulip?
Tulip can be improved by offering better design and better functionalities. While making the application workable is really good, we should also focus on being great and user-friendly. Tulip is alr...
What is your primary use case for Tulip?
My main use case for Tulip is to fill up all the data which will be available from backend for the use of a warehouse. In a warehouse environment, I use Tulip by recording all the data, which made ...
What advice do you have for others considering Tulip?
Regarding Tulip's AI capabilities, I believe its accuracy and reliability of output is good. Whatever data we provide from the data perspective is displayed, and whatever UI is created is there as ...
 

Also Known As

Teradici CAS
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Dice, HailBytes, PeerSpot and others in AWS Marketplace. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.