IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Helix ALM vs Polarion Requirements comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Perforce Logo
1,009 views|813 comparisons
Siemens Logo
3,419 views|2,715 comparisons
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Helix ALM enables users to build, make efficient and effective decisions, and use least-cost methods for maximum benefit, as fast as possible. They allow you to see and visualize your configuration."

More Helix ALM Pros →

"Its flexibility and APIs are the most valuable."

More Polarion Requirements Pros →

Cons
"It would be great to see Perforce's strategy is for implementing intelligence into the process via AI or ML. It's not clearly defined, at least not to my knowledge."

More Helix ALM Cons →

"Its user interface could be more user friendly. In addition, a lot of features are missing for test management. It should have the test case ordering feature."

More Polarion Requirements Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is expensive but not for what it is. It is just the right price for what it is. Its price is also similar to other solutions."
  • More Polarion Requirements Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
    621,327 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Helix ALM enables users to build, make efficient and effective decisions, and use least-cost methods for maximum benefit, as fast as possible. They allow you to see and visualize your configuration.
    Top Answer:The product requires a clear understanding of what you want to do because it's a make environment. So it's like handing an artist a blank sheet with any color in any pallet or any paintbrush you want… more »
    Top Answer:It would be great to see Perforce's strategy is for implementing intelligence into the process via AI or ML. It's not clearly defined, at least not to my knowledge. There're other platforms that do… more »
    Top Answer:Its flexibility and APIs are the most valuable.
    Top Answer:It is expensive but not for what it is. It is just the right price for what it is. Its price is also similar to other solutions.
    Top Answer:Its user interface could be more user friendly. In addition, a lot of features are missing for test management. It should have the test case ordering feature.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,009
    Comparisons
    813
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    550
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    3,419
    Comparisons
    2,715
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    351
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    TestTrack
    Learn More
    Overview

    TestTrack provides a centralized suite of capabilities for managing requirements, defects/issues and testing throughout the software development cycle. [1] This suite tracks everything involved in the software development process from feature requests and requirements to design revisions and actual changes in the code. [2] It keeps track of what tests were done, what was tested, who performed the test and when, on what platform, under which configuration and in what language. [3] TestTrack offers the ability to create, manage, and link artifacts from the beginning through the end of a design and development project [4] providing end-to-end traceability of all development artifacts [5] and giving managers a better handle on the shifting requirements that define their projects. [6] TestTrack enforces regulatory compliance to meet regulatory compliance requirements, including 21 CFR Part 11 and Sarbanes-Oxley.

    Polarion REQUIREMENTS is designed from the ground for highly effective, transparent and secure collaboration, while teams have the option to work in their familiar environments.
    Offer
    Learn more about Helix ALM
    Learn more about Polarion Requirements
    Sample Customers
    Invision, Softing, CACI, Hunter Industries, ITSO, Itron, EEC, Database Consultants Australia, VirtualScopics, March Networks, WorkForce
    NetSuite, Ottobock, Zumtobel Group, Kªster Automotive GmbH, Sirona Dental Systems, LifeWatch, U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), PHOENIX CONTACT Electronics GmbH, Metso Corporation
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Healthcare Company12%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company24%
    Computer Software Company19%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Energy/Utilities Company5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Requirements Management
    July 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, IBM, Jama and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: July 2022.
    621,327 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Helix ALM is ranked 8th in Application Requirements Management with 1 review while Polarion Requirements is ranked 7th in Application Requirements Management with 1 review. Helix ALM is rated 8.0, while Polarion Requirements is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Helix ALM writes "Helps you measure, automate, and visualize your processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Polarion Requirements writes "Good flexibility, good price, useful APIs, and very stable". Helix ALM is most compared with Jira, IBM Rational DOORS, IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation, Jama Connect and Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, whereas Polarion Requirements is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, Jama Connect, Jira, IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation and PTC Integrity Requirements Connector.

    See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

    We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.