No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Hasura vs Microsoft Fabric comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Hasura
Ranking in Data Management Platforms (DMP)
6th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Fabric
Ranking in Data Management Platforms (DMP)
9th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Yogi V - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at Pine Labs
Streamlines secure card data queries and has revealed performance limits that need improvement
The best features Hasura offers are the permissions and the ability to connect to the database seamlessly when we use GraphQL, which Hasura handles exceptionally well. These features impact my day-to-day work positively, as they are tremendously helpful at the application level architecture design. However, the disadvantage revolves around performance. You need to upgrade to the Enterprise version to achieve better performance and ensure proper memory is assigned in your hosting container for optimal speed as required. Hasura impacts our organization positively by being extremely useful. When we create multiple actions and cache them with Hasura, the caching has proven to be more than helpful. Furthermore, integrating OpenTelemetry into our Node application with Hasura has the added benefit of tracking Hasura calls directly, which helps us monitor our performance effectively.
Ankush-Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Software Engineer at Momentus
Unified analytics platform has simplified complex dashboards and supported secure data pipelines
One thing about Microsoft Fabric that I think could be improved is the potential confusion when working with real-time data versus normal batch loading. If you are dealing with real-time databases or data, you need to work with Event Hub and event streaming, but for normal batch processing, you can usually go ahead with the SQL warehouse or the data lakehouse. I recommend that Microsoft unify these processes, so using one source can meet both requirements. If I am working with real-time data and batched data, I should not have to manage two separate systems; instead of creating an Event Hub and a lakehouse, users could simply manage one house to handle both real-time analysis and batch processing, making it simpler and more user-friendly from both business and development perspectives.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Hasura's best feature is that it provides an API gateway, and it also provides remote schemas and monitoring, which are the best methods they are offering."
"Hasura reduced backend boilerplate and enabled real-time operational dashboards by automatically exposing database changes through GraphQL subscriptions, allowing our services to focus only on business processing while Hasura handled API generation and live data."
"Hasura has positively impacted my organization because for this project, whatever project I'm working on where previously we were using the normal DB2 which was a little complicated to use, Hasura made it very easy to understand the data flowing and data integration."
"Hasura positively impacted our organization through useful access control, allowing us to directly obtain data without extra layers of access control processes, which increased efficiency and speed."
"My advice to others looking into using Hasura is to directly use it since it is a very good application with high performance and scalability."
"I have seen a return on investment with Hasura, as the time saved is significant at 70% less time dealing with database queries and REST APIs for development, which saved a lot of people's time."
"The most significant benefit I have seen with Hasura is that it makes the developer's job much easier by eliminating the need to write custom APIs and schemas."
"Hasura greatly reduced the time to deliver and also definitely increased the productivity as a result."
"The most valuable and useful feature I have found in Microsoft Fabric is data consistency, which is the top thing."
"The best feature Microsoft Fabric offers in my experience is the Dataflow."
"The features and capabilities of Microsoft Fabric that I have found most useful include it being a uniform platform."
 

Cons

"Additionally, if you are using the free tier version, it tends to be slow."
"Regarding needed improvements, the complex business logic, nested joins, and over-fetching need to be addressed."
"Hasura can be improved through the subscription part, as the web socket is a little bit slow compared to other web sockets in the market."
"I believe that I chose a seven out of ten because I think the UI can be made better and the navigation could have been better."
"Hasura could improve by allowing us to build complex queries within it instead of depending on source databases, which might affect response speed."
"The learning curve for Hasura is not straightforward, so it takes time to learn."
"There is an issue with HTTP transactions since HTTP is a stateless protocol, making it impossible to maintain transactions, which is the only drawback found in the GraphQL queries."
"My advice for others considering Hasura is that sometimes it may not support capturing remote schemas effectively; for example, if I change something in CockroachDB, it sometimes fails to capture the change until one or two days later."
"One thing about Microsoft Fabric that I think could be improved is the potential confusion when working with real-time data versus normal batch loading."
"I think the Copilot usage in Microsoft Fabric can be improved."
"In my experience, Microsoft Fabric is not stable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Management Platforms (DMP) solutions are best for your needs.
896,942 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Hospitality Company
19%
Construction Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise7
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Hasura?
Regarding limitations, we were using the free version, and perhaps the paid version offers more features. The free version had limitations that made me wish for the paid version. Additionally, Grap...
What is your primary use case for Hasura?
Hasura was my main tool and platform for exposing all of our APIs for our insights page. Everything on our insights webpage was our analytics products from Atency, and that is where we were using H...
What advice do you have for others considering Hasura?
My experience while working with it was quite satisfactory. For others considering Hasura, its effectiveness varies depending on the company size and data amount. For medium-scale or startup compan...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Fabric?
I think Microsoft Fabric can be improved, but I feel that everything is adequate. Everything is acceptable regarding the needed improvements.
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Fabric?
My main use case for Microsoft Fabric is data engineering. A specific example of something my team has used Microsoft Fabric for is to collect information from many sources and put it in the data w...
What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Fabric?
My advice to others looking into using Microsoft Fabric is that it is a good solution. I heard from the cloud infrastructure team about this product. I do not have any additional thoughts about Mic...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Hasura vs. Microsoft Fabric and other solutions. Updated: May 2026.
896,942 professionals have used our research since 2012.