We performed a comparison between Gurucul UEBA and Wazuh based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)."I appreciate the comprehensive categorization of devices based on their intended use, such as those for DNS."
"The most valuable feature of Gurucul is the ability to customize and it is on the Hadoop platform that has a lot of flexibility."
"The reporting feature was the key differentiator. I also liked the ability to create dynamic rules in the environment."
"The deployment is easy and they provide very good documentation."
"The most valuable features are the modules and metrics."
"I like the features we use, including malware detection, inventory, detection of hidden processes, and activity logs. Inventory is probably the most important feature. It tells us when processes and packages were installed and what they are, which is helpful."
"It's very easy to integrate Wazuh with other environments, cloud applications, and on-prem applications. So, the advantage is that it's easy to implement and integrate with other solutions."
"Integrates with various open-source and paid products, allowing for flexibility in customization based on use cases."
"The tool is stable."
"The MITRE ATT&CK correlation is most valuable."
"Wazuh offers an enhanced HDR version that outperforms its competitors."
"It could be more stable."
"Gurucul can improve on the online documentation. They should educate the end users more to allow them to do everything themselves."
"Regarding the prioritization of threats, Gurucul UEBA needs to enhance its alert severity assignment process within the system."
"It would be better if they had a vulnerability assessment plug-in like the one AlienVault has. In the next release, I would like to have an app with an alerting mechanism."
"The only challenge we faced with Wazuh was the lack of direct support."
"The deployment is a bit complex."
"Wazuh should come up with more in-built rules and integrations for the cloud."
"Wazuh could improve the detection, it is not detecting all of the attacks. Additionally, it is lacking features compared to other solutions."
"A more structured approach, perhaps with modular UI components, to facilitate easier integration and navigation within the Wazuh platform for custom integrations would be beneficial."
"They need to go towards integrating with more cloud applications and not just OS like Windows and Linux."
"The implementation is very complex."
Gurucul UEBA is ranked 11th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 3 reviews while Wazuh is ranked 3rd in Log Management with 38 reviews. Gurucul UEBA is rated 6.6, while Wazuh is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Gurucul UEBA writes "Helped reduce our operational costs and increase our efficiency, but it can be more user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wazuh writes "It integrates seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services". Gurucul UEBA is most compared with Exabeam Fusion SIEM, Securonix Next-Gen SIEM and Splunk User Behavior Analytics, whereas Wazuh is most compared with Elastic Security, Security Onion, Splunk Enterprise Security, AlienVault OSSIM and Graylog.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
"SIEM" and "Next-Gen SIEM" are often used in marketing and may not have a clear definition. Each vendor may have their own interpretation of these terms. The main difference between SIEM and Next-Gen SIEM (often called XDR) is the responsibility for creating security detections. Next-Gen solutions typically offer more pre-built detections and require less maintenance compared to traditional SIEMs, which primarily focus on collecting log data.
Comparing Gurucul and Wazuh, some key differences between the two include: