Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Group-IB Digital Risk Protection vs PhishFort comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Group-IB Digital Risk Prote...
Ranking in Digital Risk Protection
10th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PhishFort
Ranking in Digital Risk Protection
33rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Anti-Malware Tools (60th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (84th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Digital Risk Protection category, the mindshare of Group-IB Digital Risk Protection is 3.6%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PhishFort is 0.8%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Digital Risk Protection Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection3.6%
PhishFort0.8%
Other95.6%
Digital Risk Protection
 

Featured Reviews

JR
CTO at systema
Broad protection, good stability, fast support, and reasonable pricing
It is in the early stage of innovation, but it has been developing constantly and rapidly. The room for improvements for this kind of solution is basically in terms of mapping between multiple resources. For example, if a fraudster or scammer is using Instagram to track potential customers of an organization, he might also use fraudulent resources of a website, mobile application, or instant messenger as a part of an elaborate scheme. Group-IB is working on mapping such related fraud resources so that they can see the whole pattern and then track the fraudster or scammer conducting the scheme. They could also improve the Risk Scoring Engine. Whenever any resource comes up in the monitoring section, there is an engine to score whether it is a high risk, low risk, or no risk, or whether it is legal for the customer. This part could be improved because different channels require different mechanisms for scoring the risk. On the website, it can score a risk easily, but for social media and instant messenger, some things need to be adjusted. It is not similar to monitoring a website.
Use PhishFort?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Risk Protection solutions are best for your needs.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about ZeroFOX, Recorded Future, Proofpoint and others in Digital Risk Protection. Updated: March 2026.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.