Gravitee vs Kong Gateway Enterprise comparison

We compared Axway AMPLIFY API Management and Kong Enterprise based on our users reviews in five parameters. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:

• Ease of Deployment

  Axway AMPLIFY API Management receives positive feedback for its easy-to-use interface, intuitive setup, and adaptable deployment choices. Users appreciate its simplicity and convenience in deploying and managing APIs. In contrast, Kong Enterprise's installation is generally seamless, although certain users encountered difficulties and needed expert assistance. The initial setup duration for Kong Enterprise can range from two to three weeks.
  
  

• Features

  Axway AMPLIFY API Management provides API lifecycle management, security and access control, analytics and reporting, and a developer portal. On the other hand, Kong Enterprise emphasizes plugin-based network services, authentication and authorization features, Lua script customization, and route limiting.
  
  

• Room for Improvement

  The users suggest that Axway AMPLIFY API Management needs enhancements in user interface, documentation, performance, integration, and support. On the other hand, Kong Enterprise could improve pricing, automatic data API creation, customization for integration, solutions for east-west communications and Zero Trust architecture, scaling up process, and developer portal.
  
  

• Pricing

  The cost of setting up Axway AMPLIFY API Management and Kong Enterprise varies depending on factors like complexity and requirements. Axway may involve extra resources or professional help, leading to higher setup expenses. On the other hand, Kong Enterprise, being open-source, tends to be more affordable.
  

• Service and Support

  Axway AMPLIFY API Management offers responsive and helpful customer support, although there have been occasional delays. Kong Enterprise also provides good customer service, with a helpful and available technical team.
  
  

Comparison Results

Axway AMPLIFY API Management is highly regarded for its user-friendly interface, easy deployment, and extensive documentation. It offers flexible deployment options and features like API lifecycle management, security, analytics, and a developer portal. Some users find the initial setup and configuration complex, and occasional performance issues have been reported. Kong Enterprise, on the other hand, is praised for its smooth installation process, plugin-based network services, and authentication features. Users appreciate its good performance and responsive customer support. However, there is room for improvement in areas such as pricing, automatic data API creation, customization for integration, and scaling up process.