Grafana Enterprise Stack vs HPE OneView comparison

Grafana Labs and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Grafana Labs is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.6, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.4. Grafana Labs holds a 1.1% mindshare in IM, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Grafana Labs users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Read 14 Grafana Enterprise Stack reviews

1,380 Views
1,366 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

HPE OneView

Read 84 HPE OneView reviews

2,525 Views
2,298 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Grafana Enterprise Stack

HPE OneView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

HPE OneView and Grafana Enterprise Stack are competing products in IT operations management. Grafana Enterprise Stack is perceived as superior due to its robust features.

Features: HPE OneView focuses on infrastructure management, providing a comprehensive hardware management solution, simple integrations with existing HPE products, and efficient lifecycle management. Grafana Enterprise Stack offers advanced data visualization, real-time monitoring, and flexible analytics capabilities, making it ideal for detailed insights and integrations across various data sources.

Room for Improvement: HPE OneView could enhance data visualization features, expand third-party integrations, and streamline its user interface for better usability. Grafana Enterprise Stack could improve hardware management capabilities, optimize deployment processes for non-specialist users, and provide deeper compatibility with certain legacy systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE OneView offers a straightforward deployment process for HPE product users and a strong customer service framework. Grafana Enterprise Stack provides a flexible deployment model and excellent customer support, particularly for data integrations and handling complex analytics requirements.

Pricing and ROI: HPE OneView generally presents lower setup costs, promising value in infrastructure-centric environments. Grafana Enterprise Stack involves a higher initial investment, offering substantial ROI through its powerful analytics and data visualization, appealing to organizations emphasizing in-depth data analysis.

To learn more, read our detailed Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. HPE OneView Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. HPE OneView

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 880,685 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE OneView

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

17th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Grafana Enterprise Stack is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE OneView is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Grafana Enterprise Stack	1.1%
HPE OneView	1.3%
Other	97.6%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Rajan M

Test Lead at Calpine Group

Efficient monitoring and alerting enhance operational insights

With Grafana Enterprise Stack, we can identify issues that New Relic cannot help with. While New Relic requires purchase and supports frontend and backend components, Grafana Enterprise Stack helps identify where issues are occurring. When we need to deep dive into issues, we use New Relic to trace transactions and determine where maximum impact occurs, whether in core size, DB side, or frontend components that slow performance. We first evaluate with Grafana Enterprise Stack, then move to New Relic if we identify performance degradation, such as DB queries taking too much time. Grafana Enterprise Stack responds to queries within 6 to 12 hours. They contact users through email immediately when available. Similarly, New Relic follows the same pattern, responding immediately when requests are raised and resolving issues promptly.

Read full review

Sajith Alawwa

Sr. Systems Engineer at a media company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Efficient management and upgrades streamline complex setups

My main complaint is about the blades on the frames, which seem to have a lot of problems. We often have to call HPE for replacements, such as for memory. Constant issues arise, leading to frequent replacement of blade parts. Additionally, the upgrade process is lengthy, requiring careful planning as we cannot match ESXi versions without aligning OneView first, leading to delays.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Grafana's full observability stack, known as LGTM, is highly valuable."

"The most valuable features for us are dashboards; we can dashboard anything that we can think of, we can dashboard and measure."

"It is very easy to deploy and integrate with any application or infrastructure layer."

"The dashboards are pretty good."

"The most valuable features of Grafana for data visualization are its ability to create intuitive dashboards and its wide range of visualization options like graphs, charts, and tables."

"Our productivity has improved with its use."

"Grafana has enough features around dashboard management. It's got enough plugins to create your dashboards."

"The ability to graph actual, live, or on-the-fly activity is valuable; it is an added value to work with Grafana Enterprise Stack and to display results or logs, which are huge in nature, in graphical characters."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack pros

"The ease of management with HPE OneView is excellent."

"Profile templates: The ability to generate the profiles and lay them down so the servers are built consistently. I would say that's probably the biggest piece of it."

"We have the dashboard up on a big screen, and you can actually see when things go wrong or if there are any faults with any of the servers. The backup is automated as well, so the appliance is quite good."

"It is very stable. We have had no downtime nor issues in approximately a year. "

"The best part is that you can integrate a two-way network. Earlier we could not manage the storage and ToR switch. Now we can create a LAN with our storage without any interface. In terms of switch management, it is now easy to understand the current configuration. It provides centralized management. It provides a single pane, and you can easily do all updates in one shot. It is a great product."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The hypervisor and cluster profiles make it easy to integrate with VMware."

"We can add VLAN and update it."

More HPE OneView pros

Cons

"They could use more small tutorials to explain a bit about how Grafana works."

"In terms of what Grafana provides, it just provides the charting tools. Everything else is third-party."

"Integrating AI capabilities for automated self-healing and reduced manual interventions would be valuable."

"Grafana Enterprise Stack is complex and not easy or simple."

"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved."

"I find Grafana really hard to configure. It's difficult to build the dashboard, and it's non-intuitive. In my opinion, it's very difficult to work with Grafana."

"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved. Currently, one needs to ingest labels and timestamps for them to be connected, however, drilling down sometimes takes time."

"The solution should include integration with Power BI."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack cons

"Those features, coming in version 4, that we're looking for are the discovery, primarily. But I think the scope-based access control is of interest, although, we didn't see any directory integration, so that, in itself, seems like it's still limited."

"From the dashboard and reporting perspective, HPE OneView could be improved by having multiple modules rather than just a single customization option."

"The interface is a bit bland. It does its job, but it could have a better interface."

"It would be better if we can add every HPE device to OneView, such as MSA, as well as the other servers like the DL server and ML server."

"HPE OneView should be able to cover more device models apart from ProLiant and Synergy."

"I saw, maybe three years ago or two years ago here, or in Barcelona, at the HPE Discover conference, a feature that you can update Clusterware with VMware. But the feature is still not live in production. Currently, you have to do all the firmware updates and then you have to do the VMware updates. So you have two reboots and it would be better if it was just one."

"The speed and performance of the solution are areas where the product lacks and needs improvement."

"The network configuration part of HPE OneView needs improvement. The solution has way too many features, and there's a need for proper configuration indicators to be put in place."

More HPE OneView cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I use the tool's free license."

"HPE could lower the price."

"This license cost for OneView was $3,000 USD."

"I am happy with the price."

"I feel the product's price falls a bit on the higher side."

"I would rate the cost as six out of ten."

"HPE had some other solutions, but they were actually quite expensive to buy. So, when OneView came along, it was kind of reasonable in terms of price for licenses, etc."

"Use it. It is free."

"I think that the price of OneView is $500 USD per server, which is a little high."

More HPE OneView pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Energy/Utilities Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	51

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Grafana Enterprise Stack?

The tool's most valuable feature is real-time monitoring. It helps in securing the application or the node by allowing us to monitor and manage resource consumption during peak times. For instance,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Grafana Enterprise Stack?

I am trying to think about its advanced alerting features; we do not use it too much for that. We do get it to report through to our help desk system and if a threshold gets broken, then a ticket i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Grafana Enterprise Stack?

I have switched to a different suite, focusing on customer edge solutions that are mostly Fortinet. To manage it, I use Grafana Enterprise Stack and a whole bunch of tools that we wrote ourselves. ...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE OneView?

The most valuable features of HPE OneView are environment monitoring, the ease of firmware upgrade, and the ability to manage all the servers and the infrastructure from one team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE OneView?

From the dashboard and reporting perspective, HPE OneView could be improved by having multiple modules rather than just a single customization option.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE OneView?

The typical use case for HPE OneView addresses a shift from manual monitoring, where clients needed to log in to the server every hour. After integrating everything on HP Service Manager and HP Ope...

See all answers

Comparisons

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 14% of the time

LiveNX vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 11% of the time

OpsRamp vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 8% of the time

Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 8% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 7% of the time

More Grafana Enterprise Stack Competitors

Cisco Intersight vs HPE OneView

Compared 12% of the time

Dell CloudIQ vs HPE OneView

Compared 10% of the time

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs HPE OneView

Compared 8% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs HPE OneView

Compared 7% of the time

Zabbix vs HPE OneView

Compared 6% of the time

More HPE OneView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Enterprise Stack

January 2026

Download Grafana Enterprise Stack product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView

January 2026

Download HPE OneView product report

Also Known As

No data available

HP OneView

Overview

Grafana Enterprise Stack is a powerful tool for real-time data monitoring and visualization. With its flexible and scalable features, it is widely used for creating dashboards, analyzing metrics, and gaining insights into infrastructure, databases, and applications.

Its valuable features include powerful visualization capabilities, extensive data source integrations, customizable dashboards, a user-friendly interface, and a robust alerting system. Users appreciate its flexibility, scalability, and ability to integrate with different data sources, making it suitable for a wide range of industries and use cases.

Grafana Labs

HPE OneView is your infrastructure automation engine to simplify operations, increasing the speed of IT delivery for new applications and services. Through software defined intelligence, HPE OneView brings a new level of automation to infrastructure management by taking a template driven approach to provisioning, updating, and integrating compute, storage, and networking infrastructure. Designed with a modern, standard-based API and supported by a large and growing partner ecosystem, HPE OneView also makes it easy to integrate powerful infrastructure automation into existing IT tools and processes. Take command with HPE OneView to deploy infrastructure faster, simplify operations and increase productivity.

HPE OneView innovations provide you the industry’s best infrastructure management experience, simplifying operations for HPE BladeSystem, HPE ProLiant servers, 3PAR storage, HPE Networking and HPE ConvergedSystems.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

1. Uber 2. PayPal 3. eBay 4. Sony 5. Red Hat 6. IBM 7. Cisco 8. Adobe 9. Expedia 10. Booking.com 11. Airbnb 12. LinkedIn 13. Twitter 14. Netflix 15. Spotify 16. Pinterest 17. Slack 18. GitLab 19. Docker 20. Atlassian 21. Salesforce 22. Microsoft 23. Google 24. Amazon 25. Facebook 26. Apple 27. Intel 28. Oracle 29. SAP 30. VMware 31. HP 32. Dell

Asante, ITS Nordics, Columbus Communications, Mansfield Oil

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. HPE OneView

January 2026

Free Report: Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. HPE OneView

Find out what your peers are saying about Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. HPE OneView and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. HPE OneView report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.