Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GP MaTe vs Maintenance Connection comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

GP MaTe
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) (31st)
Maintenance Connection
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Computerized Maintenance Management Software (CMMS) (16th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Facility and Asset Management solutions, they serve different purposes. GP MaTe is designed for Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) and holds a mindshare of 0.2%, down 0.5% compared to last year.
Maintenance Connection, on the other hand, focuses on Computerized Maintenance Management Software (CMMS), holds 2.5% mindshare, down 5.8% since last year.
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
Computerized Maintenance Management Software (CMMS)
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Infor and others in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM). Updated: April 2025.
850,900 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

GP MaTe
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Schindler Elevator, Hyster, Mueller Metals Co., Ashland, Shintech, Pennsylvania State University, Mekong Energy, Pratt & Whitney Power Systems, Wood Group
Blue Apron, Bridgestone, Cree, Fastenal Company, Five Hour Energy, Mercedes Benz, Nissan, Procter and Gamble, SSAB, Aramark, AT&T, Crest Foods, DirecTV, Gap, LifeSouth Community Blood Centers, Laureate Group, Maine Medical Center, Novartis, Nusil
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Infor and others in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM). Updated: April 2025.
850,900 professionals have used our research since 2012.