Google Chrome Enterprise vs Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) comparison

"We use the product to run applications and devices."

"The solution is easy to use."

"I am using Google Admin console for managing my devices; it is actually convenient and I am using that for managing multiple accounts and parent accounts."

"The solution has been stable."

"The standout advantage of Google Chrome Enterprise is its ease of use; it is easy to share information within the Share Drive."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its browser, which offers good performance."

"When I signed up to Google Cloud, I received between 100 to 300 dollars worth of credits to explore different services, which helped me learn Google Kubernetes service, Google Cloud Run, and GCP VMs."

"It has been working pretty well for us...By and large, things are pretty stable."

"Honestly, if I had to say the best thing about Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm), as opposed to other Linux distributions, is that there is a lot of software that explicitly recommends running it on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) rather than other Linux distributions."

"Infrastructure as code, especially with Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) or any other Linux distro, is key; if you don't have your IaC, you're going to spend forever maintaining it."

"They need to deal with their memory management."

"You still need to have a pretty good understanding of GCP to deploy it properly."

"Identifying areas for improvement can be challenging since Chrome consistently strives to enhance itself. One aspect I'd like to highlight is virtualization. For instance, if you require desktop-based applications like Cisco or Adobe products on your local machine, Chrome's support is limited. While they offer Linux solutions for virtualization, my query or request would be to expand this to include Windows-based applications. If this were implemented, it would be a valuable enhancement, encouraging broader adoption by companies."

"Additional data security and data privacy features could be proactively recommended by Google."

"I wish there was a way that they could update things a little less often if anything. I think a lot of enterprise customers are frustrated... Certain plug-ins like ad blockers will lose some functionality in the next quarter to half a year."

"Google Chrome Enterprise doesn't use AI in its solution."

"Whenever I'm using the bank that is not properly working on Chrome Enterprise, I switch to Edge."

"The solution's interface is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."

"The only thing I would say maybe could see some improvement is that every once in a while it can be a little bit of a hassle keeping the NVIDIA drivers up to date to prevent any kind of crashes or issues with the NVIDIA drivers."

"I would like to see repository clearance and clarity in the repository, as if you try to get anything from the canonical repo, there tends to be ambiguity in the descriptions and especially the versioning, which makes very little sense."

"Google Chrome Enterprise is a medium-priced solution."

"Pricing varies significantly based on different regions and specific requirements. The cost can differ for the Euro price as opposed to the Asia-specific price. Generally, the standard pricing falls within the range of twenty-five to thirty dollars per license. This payment can be structured on a monthly or yearly basis. Opting for the yearly payment plan often comes with an added discount, either directly from Google or through negotiations with your vendor."

"We are on a monthly subscription for this solution."

"So all I can say is just for us since we just recently re-upped our three-year contract for Google Education Enterprise, whatever the name is for their highest level enterprise...I found the pricing to be pretty reasonable overall."

"The product price is very good in my opinion."

"Yearly payments are to be made towards the licensing costs of Google Chrome Enterprise. It is not an expensive solution. I rate the solution's pricing model a six out of ten. There is a need to pay an extra cost in addition to the solution's standard licensing fees."