• Home
  • GNU DDD vs. Polyspace Bug Finder

GNU DDD vs Polyspace Bug Finder comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GNU Logo

GNU DDD

297 views|211 comparisons
MathWorks Logo

Polyspace Bug Finder

Read 2 Polyspace Bug Finder reviews
310 views|82 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Featured Review
Use GNU DDD?
Philip Botha
Offers Misra and Autosar compliance through static and abstract code analysis, but the reports could be cleaner
This solution helps new developers get up to speed with the Autosar, Misra C and C++ standards quickly. As an example, if they see that they are... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "This is not an expensive solution for what it offers, as there are other tools that are significantly more expensive."

    • More Polyspace Bug Finder Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    4th
    out of 13 in Debugging
    Views
    297
    Comparisons
    211
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    5th
    out of 13 in Debugging
    Views
    310
    Comparisons
    82
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    DDD
    Learn More
    GNU
    Video Not Available
    MathWorks
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    GNU DDD - (Data Display Debugger) is a graphical front-end for command-line debuggers such as GDB, DBX, WDB, Ladebug, JDB, XDB, the Perl debugger, the bash debugger bashdb, the GNU Make debugger remake, or the Python debugger pydb. Besides "usual" front-end features such as viewing source texts, DDD has become famous through its interactive graphical data display, where data structures are displayed as graphs.

    Polyspace Bug Finder helps companies identify software bugs via static analysis.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Alenia Aermacchi, CSEE Transport, Delphi Diesel Systems, EADS, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, Miracor, NASA Ames Research Center
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Wholesaler/Distributor14%
    Government14%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise57%

    GNU DDD is ranked 4th in Debugging while Polyspace Bug Finder is ranked 5th in Debugging. GNU DDD is rated 0.0, while Polyspace Bug Finder is rated 6.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Polyspace Bug Finder writes "Offers Misra and Autosar compliance through static and abstract code analysis, but the reports could be cleaner". GNU DDD is most compared with GDB, whereas Polyspace Bug Finder is most compared with .

    See our list of best Debugging vendors.

    We monitor all Debugging reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.