"If somebody is using a kind of Squish as a regression testing tool, froglogic Coco Code Coverage can be used in parallel because these two particular products can communicate with one another."
"This solution helps new developers get up to speed with the Autosar, Misra C and C++ standards quickly."
"This solution has improved our adherence to coding standards."
"froglogic Coco Code Coverage could improve by adding more computer programing language, it would be better. It only covers four languages."
"I would like to see support for annotating "Not a bug" in the source code."
"Simulating a real-time operating system and firmware can be quite difficult if you're doing multiple threading in different entry points."
froglogic Coco Code Coverage is ranked 6th in Debugging while Polyspace Bug Finder is ranked 5th in Debugging. froglogic Coco Code Coverage is rated 7.0, while Polyspace Bug Finder is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of froglogic Coco Code Coverage writes "Integrates well, highly scalable, but more programming langue support needed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Polyspace Bug Finder writes "Offers Misra and Autosar compliance through static and abstract code analysis, but the reports could be cleaner". froglogic Coco Code Coverage is most compared with , whereas Polyspace Bug Finder is most compared with .
See our list of best Debugging vendors.
We monitor all Debugging reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
