Gluu Flex vs NetIQ Access Manager comparison

Gluu Inc and OpenText are both solutions in the Access Management category. Gluu Inc is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.5, while OpenText is ranked #21. Gluu Inc holds a 1.3% mindshare in AM, compared to OpenText’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Gluu Inc users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Gluu Flex

Read 2 Gluu Flex reviews

372 Views
297 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetIQ Access Manager

Read 5 NetIQ Access Manager reviews

396 Views
260 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Gluu Flex

NetIQ Access Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

NetIQ Access Manager and Gluu Flex compete in identity and access management. NetIQ Access Manager holds an edge in customer satisfaction due to deployment ease and cost-effectiveness, while Gluu Flex stands out for its extensive features, promising higher ROI through robust capabilities.

Features: NetIQ Access Manager provides comprehensive security features like multi-factor authentication, advanced threat protection, and straightforward integration. Gluu Flex offers open-source architecture, extensive customization options, and flexible integration capabilities, catering to diverse enterprise needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetIQ Access Manager is noted for an easy deployment process and responsive customer support. Gluu Flex, though supported, requires a more technical deployment due to its open-source nature. NetIQ's straightforward deployment appeals to those needing quick and efficient implementation.

Pricing and ROI: NetIQ Access Manager offers competitive setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious organizations, with a reliable ROI. Gluu Flex may involve higher initial expenses due to customization needs, but it offers significant ROI through scalability and feature depth. While NetIQ edges in cost, Gluu Flex's feature depth and adaptability justify its pricing for those seeking long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Gluu Flex vs. NetIQ Access Manager Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Gluu Flex vs. NetIQ Access Manager

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Gluu Flex

Ranking in Access Management

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (20th)

NetIQ Access Manager

Ranking in Access Management

21st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Access Management (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Access Management category, the mindshare of Gluu Flex is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetIQ Access Manager is 1.0%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Access Management

Featured Reviews

EtienneVenter

Owner at Process2product

Facilitates improvement through feedback collection, quizzes, and event data generation

Gluu has a mobile app catering to field workers. Normal workers use the web app, a complete cloud-based solution. They log in on any device and access the system. Gluu filters and displays relevant information based on the user's role in the processes. Users can set it up to view as a viewer, worker, manager, or controller of the area. The front end offers different views but provides an easy dashboard for employees. On the dashboard, users can configure it to show tasks, related work instructions, and connected processes. It's very user-friendly, allowing end-users to understand their tasks and processes without needing in-depth knowledge.

Read full review

Cassio-Silva

Technology director at Asyg

Multi-Factor Authentication, stable, and extremely scalable

I use NetIQ Access Manager to protect one single application with Multi-Factor Authentication. The solution is deployed on both cloud and on-prem The Multi-Factor Authentication of NetIQ Access Manager has helped protect our organization. The most valuable features of NetIQ Access Manager are…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Gluu has a mobile app catering to field workers. Normal workers use the web app, a complete cloud-based solution. They log in on any device and access the system."

"Most of the features are related to banking within this particular IT industry. Security and the market are also important features."

"The features that we have found most valuable with NetIQ Access Manager are its single sign-on and two factor two second factor database."

"It's very easy to integrate with applications."

"The most valuable features of NetIQ Access Manager are SSO and Multi-Factor Authentication."

"The single sign-on feature is excellent."

"There are lots of options to customize the solution to your needs."

Cons

"I would like to see features around federation, authentication, authorization, and AI APIs with a ChatGPT interface."

"The tool integrates AI into the process modeling aspect. I believe this addition will significantly enhance usability. Additionally, it might be beneficial to have the capability to import content from other tools into this platform. Our platform follows its business process modeling notation standard, which differs from BPM. It uses a simpler notation, making it easier. The ability to import content from other tools could accommodate users accustomed to different standards."

"Having the ability to easily extract and view and compare and version control configurations would be ideal."

"In terms of what could be improved, I would say the security of the infrastructure and the server and the working networking device."

"I would love to see the upgrade procedure handled more effectively. I would prefer to have OVS installation possibilities, although the upgrade procedures should include the OS as well. You should be able to use the whole application as an appliance."

"Classification of junctions and new versions of applications, such as APIs, can be added to enable the use of more devices that utilize biometrics for Multi-Factor Authentication to improve the solution."

"The application portal could be improved with more options and easier customization."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is reasonable."

"The tool is cheaper compared to typical German products. I rate the product’s pricing a four out of ten."

"The price of the solution is average."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Insurance Company

39%

Government

14%

Media Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Gluu?

Gluu has a mobile app catering to field workers. Normal workers use the web app, a complete cloud-based solution. They log in on any device and access the system.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Gluu?

The tool is cheaper compared to typical German products. I rate the product’s pricing a four out of ten. The cost depends on the model you choose. If you go bigger, like a thousand or more users, t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Gluu?

The tool integrates AI into the process modeling aspect. I believe this addition will significantly enhance usability. Additionally, it might be beneficial to have the capability to import content ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Auth0 vs Gluu Flex

Compared 37% of the time

Amazon Cognito vs Gluu Flex

Compared 33% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Gluu Flex

Compared 31% of the time

More Gluu Flex Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs NetIQ Access Manager

Compared 54% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs NetIQ Access Manager

Compared 46% of the time

More NetIQ Access Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Access Management

April 2025

Download Gluu Flex product report

Buyer's Guide

NetIQ Access Manager vs. Symantec Siteminder

April 2025

Download NetIQ Access Manager product report

Overview

Gluu Flex is an enterprise-level tool designed for identity and access management, offering advanced security and flexibility tailored to meet demanding IT environments. Focusing on high-performance capabilities, Gluu Flex caters to complex authentication needs for businesses.

This platform provides scalable solutions for businesses looking to integrate efficient identity management. It is designed with adaptability in mind, enabling seamless integration with existing infrastructure. The core features support a robust authentication framework that ensures secure user access across IT systems. With the flexibility to handle complex configurations and provide comprehensive support, it meets the modern demands businesses face.

What are the key features of Gluu Flex?

Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to growing business needs without compromising performance.
Advanced Authentication: Supports multifactor authentication for enhanced security.
Seamless Integration: Integrates smoothly with existing IT environments.
Comprehensive Support: Offers thorough documentation and responsive customer service.

What benefits should you expect from using Gluu Flex?

Enhanced Security: Delivers robust protection against unauthorized access.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces overhead by streamlining identity management processes.
Operational Agility: Provides faster response to evolving IT requirements.
Increased Compliance: Ensures alignment with regulatory standards for data protection.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, Gluu Flex is implemented to safeguard sensitive information and streamline access management. Its ability to offer bespoke security solutions makes it a preferred choice for sectors with stringent compliance needs, allowing businesses to achieve greater efficiency and control.

Gluu Inc

Access Manager provides a simple yet secure and scalable solution that can handle all your web access needs both internal as well as in the cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Dubai Municipality

Bancomext, Bouwend Nederland, Camera dei Deputati, CGT, Coopservice Group, Court of Appeals of Georgia, Etnic, European Automotive Manufacturer, FDM Document Dynamics, Hainan Province Information Center, Highland Community College, Huntington Bank, Johnsonville Sausage, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Mazars, Mexico's Tax Administration Service, Owens Community College, Pasco Risk, RDC, School District of Hartford, Senckenberg Nature Research Society, Sheetz, Spanish Public Employment Service, SUNY Orange County Community College, Swisscard, The Municipality of Siena, The University of Westminster, UMB Financial Corporation Invests in Identity Management, University of Dayton, University of Groningen, Vodacom, World Wide Technology

Buyer's Guide

Gluu Flex vs. NetIQ Access Manager

April 2025

Free Report: Gluu Flex vs. NetIQ Access Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Gluu Flex vs. NetIQ Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Gluu Flex vs. NetIQ Access Manager report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.