GitLab vs Parasoft SOAtest comparison

GitLab and Parasoft are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. GitLab is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6, while Parasoft is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.5. GitLab holds a 2.6% mindshare in SAST, compared to Parasoft’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Parasoft users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 85 GitLab reviews

3,342 Views
512 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 31 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

891 Views
169 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

GitLab

Parasoft SOAtest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and GitLab are strong contenders in the software testing and development management category. While Parasoft SOAtest is recognized for its robust testing capabilities in complex environments, GitLab takes the lead with its comprehensive CI/CD pipelines and project management features, providing a more integrated suite of development tools.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest features extensive testing automation, adept at handling complex testing scenarios and delivering detailed analytics. GitLab provides robust CI/CD pipeline integration, versatile project management tools, and a complete development environment that supports seamless workflows.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest faces challenges in enhancing scalability, improving tool integration, and proactive customer support. GitLab needs to enhance its security features, simplify configuration settings, and address deployment challenges for better user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest offers straightforward deployment, but users wish for more proactive customer service. GitLab deployment experiences vary, with some users enjoying the flexibility and others encountering issues. However, GitLab's customer service is more responsive, aiding smoother implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest users are concerned about its higher initial setup costs but acknowledge significant ROI due to its testing efficiencies. GitLab offers competitive pricing with substantial ROI based on its diverse, integrated development toolset.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. Parasoft SOAtest Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Parasoft SOAtest

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.6

GitLab improves ROI by increasing efficiency, reducing deployment time, and enhancing DevOps through cost-saving, automation, and vulnerability management.

Sentiment score

7.4

Parasoft SOAtest enhances API testing efficiency with minimal coding, offering high ROI and simplified complex test creation.

Migrating to GitLab is bringing time-saving benefits, and everything is easier to automate.

reviewer2603940

IT Manager at a tech company with 5,001-10,000 employees

We have saved time significantly, reducing deployment time from four hours to five minutes per deployment.

Andrea PICCININI

IT Software Architect at ANAC - Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione

For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report

We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.8

GitLab's support varies by license; paid users praise responsiveness, while free version users rely on community forums and documentation.

Sentiment score

7.8

Customer service is effective and quick, though international communication and complex issues occasionally cause delays.

We have rarely needed to escalate issues to technical support since GitLab usually runs seamlessly.

Gaurav Chandel

AWS DevOps/ Site Reliability Engineer at Tata Consultancy

I have interacted with architects for some advice during the implementation, and they were prompt in their response.

Mikhael Ibrahim

Platform Engineer & Manager at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

I have had meetings where they taught me, explained things, and provided guidance for starting from scratch.

reviewer2603940

IT Manager at a tech company with 5,001-10,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.4

GitLab's scalable container architecture supports diverse environments, flexible deployment, and smooth integration, despite some configuration and scaling challenges.

Sentiment score

7.2

Parasoft SOAtest is praised for scalability, but faces challenges with large tests and cloud platforms, requiring careful design.

It has all the features required for our coding and deployment needs, which makes it scalable to our changing requirements.

Sarfaraz Khan

Senior Application Developer at IBM

We're transitioning to OpenShift for future scalability with increased user numbers.

Mikhael Ibrahim

Platform Engineer & Manager at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

For scaling, other deployment options from GitLab's side need to be adopted.

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.2

GitLab is highly stable and reliable, with minor issues mainly under heavy load or during updates.

Sentiment score

7.5

Parasoft SOAtest is generally stable with improved reliability since 9.10, and support effectively resolves occasional performance issues.

I have not encountered any performance or stability issues with GitLab so far.

Gaurav Chandel

AWS DevOps/ Site Reliability Engineer at Tata Consultancy

The updates are frequent and demanding, happening at least once a week due to security reasons.

Andrew Schetinin

Chief Technology Officer at Acclym

For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

Room For Improvement

GitLab users seek improved CI/CD automation, integrations, user interface, project management, security, pricing, and support for enhanced usability.

Parasoft SOAtest needs UI enhancements, better reporting, improved integration, and documentation, with issues in memory, robustness, and compatibility.

It would be beneficial to have a user-friendly interface for setting up these configurations, instead of just writing YAML files.

reviewer2603940

IT Manager at a tech company with 5,001-10,000 employees

It is essential to conduct proper testing, such as unit tests and code coverage, within the SDLC pipelines.

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly.

Sarfaraz Khan

Senior Application Developer at IBM

For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report

It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

Setup Cost

GitLab provides flexible pricing with open-source access and paid tiers, catering to different enterprise needs and budgets.

Parasoft SOAtest is costly but valued for its robust automation and features; organizations should evaluate its suitability.

Even when working in other small organizations, we opted for GitLab as it was cost-efficient.

Sarfaraz Khan

Senior Application Developer at IBM

The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.

reviewer2603940

IT Manager at a tech company with 5,001-10,000 employees

The price is high, and it limits user accessibility.

Andrea PICCININI

IT Software Architect at ANAC - Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione

For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report

Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

Valuable Features

GitLab excels in UI, CI/CD, code management, and integration, offering user-friendly, efficient, and scalable development and deployment features.

Parasoft SOAtest streamlines test scenario setup with powerful tools, enhancing customization, scalability, and automation in testing processes.

As we implement automated testing and DevSecOps, it speeds up the process by forty to sixty percent.

Mikhael Ibrahim

Platform Engineer & Manager at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

The Ultimate version offers enhanced features for security scanning through DAST and SAST analysis, which have greatly benefitted our project workflow.

Andrea PICCININI

IT Software Architect at ANAC - Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione

By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report

Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (9th), Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (3rd), DevSecOps (1st)

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

25th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (19th), API Testing Tools (10th), Test Automation Tools (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of GitLab is 2.6%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab ( /products/gitlab-reviews ) are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

Milind Parab

Sr. Principal Software Engineer at Cadence Design Systems

A stable solution that can be used for automotive compliance and generates good reports

Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings. Going through that is a challenge. It only happens in the initial stage when we are setting up the tool, but it can be improved. Parasoft SOAtest could add code coverage, which will help us do the coverage in a single tool.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

24%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing and cost are on par with other tools and are neither too expensive nor cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

One significant feature we lack is the configuration that enforces code reviews, which simplifies the development life cycle. Unfortunately, this is available only at a higher license level than we...

See all answers

What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?

Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro. The new management does not want subscription tools around, aiming for scripted tests us...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

One area that could use improvement is the cryptography capabilities in Parasoft SOAtest. It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our ow...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 24% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 15% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 7% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Postman vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 21% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 21% of the time

Coverity vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 9% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

June 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

June 2025

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

SOAtest

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Parasoft SOAtest

June 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. Parasoft SOAtest

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Parasoft SOAtest and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. Parasoft SOAtest report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.