Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GitHub CoPilot vs Jitterbit Vinyl comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.3
GitHub CoPilot boosts productivity and reduces costs with up to 500% return, improving customer experience and documentation efficiency.
Sentiment score
7.5
Organizations saw significant ROI and efficiency from Jitterbit Vinyl, with faster application turnaround, budget adherence, and reduced development times.
Efficiencies with GitHub CoPilot have improved by 30%, which means a quicker go-to market and a simplified way of documenting technical designs.
Vice President of Products at C5i
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
4.6
Users have mixed experiences with GitHub CoPilot support, praising community help but noting occasional response delays and onboarding improvements.
Sentiment score
8.4
Jitterbit Vinyl's customer service is praised for its prompt, effective support and ability to adapt creatively to user needs.
With a large user base, it covers a wide range of questions, from simple to complex, ensuring that answers are available.
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
GitHub technical support is excellent.
AppSec engineer at EastNets Holding Ltd.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
GitHub CoPilot scales effectively, providing easy cloud-based scalability and flexibility, despite occasional traffic issues and automation challenges.
Sentiment score
7.4
Users praise Jitterbit Vinyl for its seamless integration, scalability, reliable performance, and flexibility in supporting growing user bases and roles.
It cannot be fully depended on to build every component and run a large enterprise application without significant human intervention.
Vice President of Products at C5i
With an enterprise plan, there are no limitations, so scalability is not an issue.
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
It is quite easy to scale.
QA Manager at Synechron
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
GitHub CoPilot is generally stable, rated highly by users, with minor connectivity issues noted primarily in large enterprises.
Sentiment score
8.3
Jitterbit Vinyl is highly reliable, featuring excellent uptime, solid performance, seamless integration, and 100% uptime over six months.
At certain times, you may not get the required response and realize it's either down or not responding for other reasons.
Vice President of Products at C5i
In most cases, it does not generate irrelevant code.
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Room For Improvement

GitHub CoPilot needs better language support, IDE integration, user control, contextual accuracy, debugging, and technology support with cost concerns.
Users seek improved metadata handling, document upload speeds, flexible design, better text editor, intuitive themes, and enhanced B2C development.
Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs. They need to work on it and they need to review the code.
QA Manager at Synechron
There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen.
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
To understand our application better and learn from it would likely require access to the entire codebase, which a lot of companies may not allow.
Vice President of Products at C5i
 

Setup Cost

GitHub CoPilot offers a free version, personal and enterprise pricing, with varied perceptions on its value and affordability.
Enterprise users praise Jitterbit Vinyl for its cost-effectiveness, transparent pricing, and valuable annual subscription model with minimal hidden costs.
They recently made Copilot free to use up to a certain limit, which is a positive change.
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
The kind of use that I am having with a $20-30 license, I think it is really of really good help.
QA Manager at Synechron
 

Valuable Features

GitHub CoPilot boosts coding productivity with AI-driven suggestions, multi-language support, and IDE integration for efficient development.
Jitterbit Vinyl offers fast development, flexible integration, no-code tools, seamless migration, easy customization, robust UI, efficient workflows, and strong security.
It is certainly time-saving; we have seen upwards of around 30% plus of time savings using GitHub CoPilot.
Vice President of Products at C5i
Things which were taking like two days are now finished within half an hour.
QA Manager at Synechron
Copilot is integrated into my environment, providing the context and the bigger picture of how the code is used throughout the project.
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
AI Code Assistants (2nd)
Jitterbit Vinyl
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
27th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Low-Code Development Platforms (24th), No-Code Development Platforms (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 5.2%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jitterbit Vinyl is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
GitHub CoPilot5.2%
Jitterbit Vinyl0.8%
Other94.0%
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

TusharShankar - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Manager at Synechron
AI coding assistant has transformed development speed and supports learning new languages
Any technology comes with two things, or rather anything in this world has both sides, good and bad. LLMs also have the same thing. The bad part is for a person who is 100% dependent on AI because they won't be able to learn more if they are 100% dependent on that. The main thing is that there has to be restraint from our side. I won't say it is from the tool side, but from our side, we need to learn and we need to work on it. We need to review the code. That is one thing that we need to do from our end. From a technology perspective, it is designed to help us out, and it is totally on our side of thinking about how exactly we are going to use that. There is not any area for improvement from the tool side, but it is from the users altogether. Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs. They need to work on it and they need to review the code.
reviewer2208660 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mobile Dog Product Manager at BioPet Laboratories
It has sped up the app development process, enabling us to release a public version of the app much quicker
Some aspects of VINYL are limiting from a B2C standpoint. For example, it would be nice to have more flexibility with what the VINYL parameters allow us to develop within the app. It is difficult to think of an example off the top of my head, but there have been times when we couldn't develop something a particular way because VINYL didn't support it. However, the team Zudy assigned to us has been great about adjusting and finding ways around these hurdles.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Performing Arts
8%
Consumer Goods Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise14
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise14
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
I am not fully aware of the pricing details as my company manages it, but I recall it was not inexpensive.
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
GitHub CoPilot should be integrated with different IDEs beyond VS Code, as it is currently only supported by VS Code.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Aetna, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc., Alvarez and Marsal, Audacy, Barstool Sports, Brooks Brothers, Cal-Maine Foods Inc., CNH Financial, Collette Travel, Darn Tough Vermont, DXL, Fresh Direct, iHeartMedia, Intra-Cellular Therapies, JBS Foods, J.Crew, Kraft Sports Group, MEMIC, New England Patriots, PGT Trucking Inc., United Healthcare, Worley
Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub CoPilot vs. Jitterbit Vinyl and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.