GitHub CoPilot vs Jitterbit Vinyl comparison

GitHub CoPilot
Read 14 GitHub CoPilot reviews
  • 1,063 Views
  • 969 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
Jitterbit Vinyl
Read 31 Jitterbit Vinyl reviews
  • 1,450 Views
  • 343 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between GitHub CoPilot and Jitterbit Vinyl based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed GitHub CoPilot vs. Jitterbit Vinyl Report (Updated: May 2024).
Buyer's Guide
GitHub CoPilot vs. Jitterbit Vinyl
May 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 787,779 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
15th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Jitterbit Vinyl
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
20th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Low-Code Development Platforms (16th), No-Code Development Platforms (6th)
 

Featured Reviews

HappyBhalla - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 19, 2023
Helps with code review, test case generation, and chat features
In a few cases, the results aren't correct, so that needs improvement. Also, it would be great if the results could be presented in different formats, not just text. As engineers, it takes time to read through text-based results. If they could provide diagrams or basic design architectures, it would be easier to understand and take less time to review. So, as of now, image functionality is not provided by GitHub Copilot, and it would be great if they could add that. So, I would like to see improvements in the result generation, more results, different result formats, and image functionality.
Read full review
NM
Aug 26, 2022
Robust data collection and reporting with excellent training resources
I don't have much to say about improvements. I am relatively new when it comes to the development of apps in Vinyl. I sometimes find formatting tricky to get the front end of an app the way I want it. That could be improved by a more intuitive use of themes. Overall, Vinyl does a very good job at what it is meant to do - low code development of apps. It helps to have a background in SQL. It is not necessary, however, as Vinyl shows you all the underlying data to the app under development. It has become an invaluable tool for our organization.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later."
"The document generation features are valuable."
"GitHub CoPilot helps us auto-complete code. The tool's context awareness benefits our projects because it identifies the context in which we are working and automatically proposes solutions that we use."
"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."
"The CoPilot app that you can use while creating presentations is very useful."
"The product's initial setup is straightforward because it's pushed through the updates."
"When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."
"The product is easy to integrate."
More GitHub CoPilot pros
"VINYL has really helped us speed up application development at a reasonable cost."
"The Lite Integration is really the key thing. You're able to attach the Vinyl software to a variety of different systems very easily and pull data together in a way that is really difficult to do using traditional technology... Also, the fact that it's a no-code platform also makes it easier for people to understand and deal with internally, to continue to build applications and modify existing applications."
"You do not need to be a programmer to use it or build something in it."
"One of the most valuable features of the solution is how rapid we can implement it, going from a design to an operational concept in a very short period of time."
"It's like breaking apart coding and development into an ultra-configuration tool... It really is flexible."
"The product has reduced the time that it takes us to produce apps."
"The integration is a huge accelerator into enabling new business processes. As a small company, we have a few different systems that otherwise couldn't talk to each other. We recognize, from an IT perspective, the value that data and change in status of certain data in one area could influence the ability to take action in another. With these integration points, we are able to essentially create that communication from one system to another, letting system B know that something has been completed or is ready in system A. That allows our users to know that they are ready to complete a task. Without that, we would be relying on a lot of manual communication. We would be relying on individuals sending emails, saying, "Hey, by the way, this is ready in system A." Now, we have the system recognizing it and shooting that email off automatically, with all the instructions necessary."
"It gives us an accurate idea of where we stand as a business, on many different levels. It also gives our sales department more of an idea of how they are doing for the month, every month. And it gives us more capabilities within our systems, to pull information out."
More Jitterbit Vinyl pros
 

Cons

"The tool must improve its ability to work with multiple files."
"The solution is expensive. It should also support other programming languages."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The suggestions provided by the product must be improved."
"The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects."
"GitHub CoPilot's alerting features need improvement."
"In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point."
"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."
More GitHub CoPilot cons
"I sometimes find formatting tricky to get the front end of an app the way I want it."
"Right now it's very dependent on having an imagination to understand."
"I would love to have the home screen a little more customizable because, as we're building more and more reports, it would be nice to have more options in how they're organized on the screen."
"I don't have a lot of negative things to say about the platform. One of the things we joke about, because it is very minor in detail, is that as with any platform, when you're hosting a live webinar on a GoToMeeting or a Zoom, everything slows down a little bit. So when you're doing a live demo internally with folks, the platform can go a step slower. That's not necessarily just a Zudy thing."
"The ease of use for individuals to self-serve could be improved. The solution is no-code, but there is still a decent learning curve associated with the product and some app design principles necessary before people can self-serve."
"The calendar has room for improvement, but that's what they're going to be working on next, to make a Gantt chart."
"One of the troubles we have sometimes is the amount of data we're processing within the applications. That can really add a lot of "laggy-ness." That's an ongoing struggle we're going to have while we use it. It doesn't happen for all our applications, only some of them that are heavy on the reporting."
"During the initial rollout, the text editor wasn't 100% what we were looking for, but we were able to get the job done. After some discussions and finding ways to use different plugins during the short term, Zudy actually came back a few months later and said that they have integrated a standard product into their text editing that checked all the boxes for us."
More Jitterbit Vinyl cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
"The solution is costly."
"There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution."
"The product offers a free version and a paid version. Whether to choose the product's free version or paid version depends on the size of the company where it will be used."
"We have a license but need another one for the GitHub CoPilot tool."
"It's affordable."
"A personal license is priced at ten dollars per month, while a professional or enterprise license costs nineteen dollars per user, and these rates are consistent for all users."
"The pricing is reasonable. I think it is 10 USD per user."
More GitHub CoPilot pricing and cost advice
"I feel the product’s pricing is a good value. The licensing model is very straightforward. You license the platform and you can build however many solutions you want with it."
"The pricing and the licensing of Zudy are reasonable. Pricing is always a tricky thing. It could be a little simpler, but they're doing well. I'm happy with it."
"The licensing costs we pay are, I believe about 5,000 a month. That's every quarter. We've been doing it for about a year now, and the prices have remained steady. We feel it's a reasonable cost for what we're getting because it's unlimited users. So as big as you want to make it, you're not constrained by a per-user licensing cost or any of those other restrictions, so that's going to stifle your development."
"You always look for the underlying cost, there's always underlying costs but the value is fine. I don't think it should cost any more. You pay for the software but you're also paying for their employees, when they work onsite for you."
"Pricing and licensing are expensive."
"The key thing here is that the pricing is just one price. We can do as much or as little with the product as we want to which is very attractive. I don't have to worry about if I build a new app, I have to pay more. Or, if I put 20 more people logging into the app, I don't have to pay any extra for that either."
"The pricing is moderate. It's okay."
"Our licensing costs are approximately 100K annually, and from my perspective, that really is quite the value with the flexibility and what we're getting from the product."
More Jitterbit Vinyl pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Healthcare Company
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Insurance Company
8%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub CoPilot?
The product is easy to integrate.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
We have a demo license. Once we understand what we'll do, we'll start with a paid license.
See all answers
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects.
See all answers
What do you like most about Zudy VINYL?
The ZPM system enables us to organize projects and monitor their progress. The ease of logging into the VINYL app to test new features makes testing smoother, and we feel more involved in the crea...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zudy VINYL?
Payment processing has changed since Jitterbit acquired Zudy. We previously cut checks, but we are no longer allowed. This has made paying for the service more complicated, but the issue is being r...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Zudy VINYL?
Some aspects of VINYL are limiting from a B2C standpoint. For example, it would be nice to have more flexibility with what the VINYL parameters allow us to develop within the app. It is difficult t...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

GitLab vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
GitLab vs GitHub CoPilot
Compared 38% of the time
Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GitHub CoPilot
Compared 19% of the time
Pega BPM vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
Pega BPM vs GitHub CoPilot
Compared 12% of the time
ServiceNow vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
ServiceNow vs GitHub CoPilot
Compared 9% of the time
Mendix vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
Mendix vs GitHub CoPilot
Compared 7% of the time
More GitHub CoPilot Competitors
Microsoft Power Apps vs Jitterbit Vinyl Logo
Microsoft Power Apps vs Jitterbit Vinyl
Compared 59% of the time
OutSystems vs Jitterbit Vinyl Logo
OutSystems vs Jitterbit Vinyl
Compared 21% of the time
QuickBase vs Jitterbit Vinyl Logo
QuickBase vs Jitterbit Vinyl
Compared 20% of the time
More Jitterbit Vinyl Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
GitHub CoPilot
June 2024
GitHub CoPilot reportDownload GitHub CoPilot product report
Buyer's Guide
Jitterbit Vinyl
June 2024
Jitterbit Vinyl reportDownload Jitterbit Vinyl product report
 

Learn More

GitHub
Jitterbit
 

Overview

Trained on billions of lines of code, GitHub Copilot turns natural language prompts into coding suggestions across dozens of languages.

Jitterbit's Vinyl (previously Zudy) is an enterprise low-code application platform that makes it easy to build scalable, end-to-end apps that are easily integrated with new and existing systems. Designed for large enterprises to solve complex business problems at scale, Vinyl empowers anyone to create fully integrated, bi-directional applications in weeks. Powerful enough for Full Stack Developers, intuitive enough for Citizen Developers/Business Technologists, Vinyl empowers you to create secure apps that run on any device, automate any business process, and integrate any data source without coding.

  • Create fully integrated, bi-directional applications

  • Utilize guided development and visual rule builders

  • Predictable pricing with no per-user fees

  • Integrate the entire ecosystem without impacting source data

  • Protect apps with enterprise-grade security

  • Integrate real-time data

  • Deploy apps via enterprise cloud, on-premise or hosted

  • Improve customer digital experience


For more information: www.jitterbit.com/product/viny

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Aetna, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc., Alvarez and Marsal, Audacy, Barstool Sports, Brooks Brothers, Cal-Maine Foods Inc., CNH Financial, Collette Travel, Darn Tough Vermont, DXL, Fresh Direct, iHeartMedia, Intra-Cellular Therapies, JBS Foods, J.Crew, Kraft Sports Group, MEMIC, New England Patriots, PGT Trucking Inc., United Healthcare, Worley
Buyer's Guide
GitHub CoPilot vs. Jitterbit Vinyl
May 2024
Free Report: GitHub CoPilot vs. Jitterbit Vinyl
Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub CoPilot vs. Jitterbit Vinyl and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our GitHub CoPilot vs. Jitterbit Vinyl report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.