Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GitHub CoPilot vs Jitterbit Vinyl comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.6
GitHub CoPilot boosts productivity, efficiency, and resource management, though it may be costly for some individual users.
Sentiment score
7.5
Organizations saw significant ROI and efficiency from Jitterbit Vinyl, with faster application turnaround, budget adherence, and reduced development times.
Efficiencies with GitHub CoPilot have improved by 30%, which means a quicker go-to market and a simplified way of documenting technical designs.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
4.5
GitHub CoPilot support receives mixed reviews; users value knowledgeable help but note delays, relying on community and Microsoft resources.
Sentiment score
8.4
Jitterbit Vinyl's customer service is praised for its prompt, effective support and ability to adapt creatively to user needs.
With a large user base, it covers a wide range of questions, from simple to complex, ensuring that answers are available.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
GitHub CoPilot scales well but faces reliability issues under high traffic, with performance varying by deployment scale and plan.
Sentiment score
7.4
Users praise Jitterbit Vinyl for its seamless integration, scalability, reliable performance, and flexibility in supporting growing user bases and roles.
It cannot be fully depended on to build every component and run a large enterprise application without significant human intervention.
With an enterprise plan, there are no limitations, so scalability is not an issue.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
GitHub CoPilot is stable with minor connectivity issues, prompting some users to explore alternatives for certain tasks.
Sentiment score
8.3
Jitterbit Vinyl is highly reliable, featuring excellent uptime, solid performance, seamless integration, and 100% uptime over six months.
At certain times, you may not get the required response and realize it's either down or not responding for other reasons.
In most cases, it does not generate irrelevant code.
 

Room For Improvement

GitHub CoPilot needs improved stability, integration, suggestion accuracy, contextual awareness, language support, and pricing to enhance functionality and usability.
Users seek improved metadata handling, document upload speeds, flexible design, better text editor, intuitive themes, and enhanced B2C development.
To understand our application better and learn from it would likely require access to the entire codebase, which a lot of companies may not allow.
There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen.
 

Setup Cost

GitHub CoPilot costs $10 monthly for personal use, $19 for enterprise, with possible discounts for current GitHub licensees.
Enterprise users praise Jitterbit Vinyl for its cost-effectiveness, transparent pricing, and valuable annual subscription model with minimal hidden costs.
They recently made Copilot free to use up to a certain limit, which is a positive change.
 

Valuable Features

GitHub CoPilot enhances productivity with code generation, test creation, multi-language support, and seamless IDE integration for faster development.
Jitterbit Vinyl offers fast development, flexible integration, no-code tools, seamless migration, easy customization, robust UI, efficient workflows, and strong security.
It is certainly time-saving; we have seen upwards of around 30% plus of time savings using GitHub CoPilot.
Copilot is integrated into my environment, providing the context and the bigger picture of how the code is used throughout the project.
 

Categories and Ranking

GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
AI Code Assistants (1st)
Jitterbit Vinyl
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
28th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Low-Code Development Platforms (25th), No-Code Development Platforms (16th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 6.0%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jitterbit Vinyl is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

TarunRevalla - PeerSpot reviewer
Saves time with context-aware code suggestions and seamless integration
In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable suggestions where applicable. There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen. I also run many automations within GitHub. When an NPR is raised, it automatically provides suggestions, which is part of the enterprise edition without limitations. While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections. If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load.
LE
Can connect to any data source so we don't need to replicate data into a data warehouse to do reporting analytics
Having been a customer of theirs for a long time, I think the UI needed improvements early on. But, they have done a remarkable job catching up in that regard. They have always been great at connecting to a variety of data sources. They are a leader in that space. They do a great job, from a business analyst perspective, helping you shape what the ultimate system is going to look like. There really aren't a lot of areas that need improvement. The areas that they have, they are keenly aware of and have made great strides in recent releases.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Healthcare Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Consumer Goods Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
I honestly don't have a clue about how much we usually pay for GitHub CoPilot because the increase in license costs is managed by another team, and I am not the administrator, so I generally don't ...
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
The areas of GitHub CoPilot that need improvement include the ability to debug, which is applicable to AI-driven tools that allow you to code, and to understand our application better and learn fro...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Aetna, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc., Alvarez and Marsal, Audacy, Barstool Sports, Brooks Brothers, Cal-Maine Foods Inc., CNH Financial, Collette Travel, Darn Tough Vermont, DXL, Fresh Direct, iHeartMedia, Intra-Cellular Therapies, JBS Foods, J.Crew, Kraft Sports Group, MEMIC, New England Patriots, PGT Trucking Inc., United Healthcare, Worley
Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub CoPilot vs. Jitterbit Vinyl and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.