GFI LanGuard vs SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GFI LanGuard and SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLTech, Kaseya and others in Patch Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Patch Management Report (Updated: February 2024).
757,198 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is easy to use and integrates well with other operating systems.""This product is a great solution at a great price as long as it is only going to be used for a local area network.""The initial setup was easy.""The most useful features of GFI LanGuard are vulnerability assessment and patching solutions.""The most valuable features in GFI LanGuard are patch management and vulnerability assessment.""I like that the solution can block users from unnecessarily putting devices on the network.""The most valuable feature is that I am able to patch third-party solutions.""It is helpful to patch and scan vulnerabilities."

More GFI LanGuard Pros →

"Although it is, in fact, a complete vulnerability management solution, the most valuable feature is the patch management functionality. Most of our customers give preference to this tool over other tools when it comes to patch management."

More SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform Pros →

Cons
"If GFI LanGuard had a cloud version it would be better for people that are working from home.""GFI LanGuard has some technical limitations with machines.""GFI LanGuard could improve the rollback feature. If we have installed the wrong we have had some issues with the rollback function. Additionally, more input from GFI LanGuard for the custom software push install.""The version we are using only allows one person to use it at a time and does not allow multi-users.""GFI LanGuard can improve by adding asset tracking.""When you want to uninstall software from an endpoint, sometimes it becomes very problematic.""This solution is limited to the local area network only and cannot manage remote devices.""GFI LanGuard can improve by adding more modules, such as asset control or asset inventory."

More GFI LanGuard Cons →

"SanerNow has good integration with the more well known ITSM tools, but at the same time there are many other ITSM (IT Service Management) tools available in the market, including local tools here in India, and I'm not sure how SanerNow plans to integrate with them all out of the box."

More SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "GFI LanGuard has very fair pricing compared to other similar solutions out there."
  • "We are a gold partner and we receive favorable discounts. The price of GFI LanGuard is competitive. When you evaluate other solutions, such as ManageEngine."
  • "GFI LanGuard cost approximately $1,000 annually to use the solution."
  • "On a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being competitive, I would rate the price as a four."
  • "GFI LanGuard isn't expensive."
  • "I rate the pricing of GFI LanGuard a four out of five."
  • More GFI LanGuard Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "As with several other solutions such as Microsoft MECM and SCCM, the licensing for SanerNow involves per-device pricing for each kind of product or service on offer."
  • More SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
    757,198 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of GFI LanGuard is its email spam feature.
    Top Answer:The only drawback with GFI LanGuard is that you cannot directly integrate it from the Outlook email; instead, you have to first log in to the site to make changes. Instead of directly white listing or… more »
    Top Answer:Although it is, in fact, a complete vulnerability management solution, the most valuable feature is the patch management functionality. Most of our customers give preference to this tool over other… more »
    Top Answer:As with several other solutions such as Microsoft MECM and SCCM, the licensing for SanerNow involves per-device pricing for each kind of product or service on offer. When it comes to per-device… more »
    Top Answer:SanerNow has good integration with the more well-known ITSM tools, but at the same time, there are many other ITSM (IT Service Management) tools available in the market, including local tools here in… more »
    Ranking
    9th
    out of 49 in Patch Management
    Views
    2,001
    Comparisons
    993
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    389
    Rating
    8.0
    11th
    out of 49 in Patch Management
    Views
    197
    Comparisons
    136
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    1,045
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    LanGuard
    SecPod SanerNow, SanerNow RP
    Learn More
    GFI
    Video Not Available
    Secpod Technologies
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    GFI LanGuard enables complete patch management of security and non-security patches to Microsoft operating systems, Mac OS X, major Linux distributions and third-party applications. It can also automate patching for all major web browsers too.

    SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform and tools provide a paradigm shift in endpoint security and systems management. SanerNow simplifies endpoint security, increases IT and security effectiveness, and reduces IT management cost. Platform specific tools provide vulnerability scanning, patching, compliance, asset, endpoint, and threat management. SanerNow provides one dashboard with one agent to address multiple high value business use cases.
    Sample Customers
    BayView Medical Clinic, FrugalBrothers Software, Zaw, National Theatre, American Red Cross
    SACTECH, SACTECH, NEWBERRY GROUP, DIZZION
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company7%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business75%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise56%
    Buyer's Guide
    Patch Management
    February 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLTech, Kaseya and others in Patch Management. Updated: February 2024.
    757,198 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GFI LanGuard is ranked 9th in Patch Management with 7 reviews while SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is ranked 11th in Patch Management with 1 review. GFI LanGuard is rated 8.0, while SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of GFI LanGuard writes "A scalable, competitively priced solution with a good ROI and easy setup process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform writes "Advanced vulnerability Management solution with out-of-the-box integrations". GFI LanGuard is most compared with Microsoft Windows Server Update Services, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Microsoft Configuration Manager, BigFix and Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager, whereas SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, NinjaOne and Rapid7 InsightVM.

    See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

    We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.