GFI LanGuard vs Microsoft Configuration Manager comparison

GFI and Microsoft are both solutions in the Patch Management category. GFI is ranked #16, while Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. GFI holds a 2.4% mindshare in PM, compared to Microsoft’s 8.6% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of GFI users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

GFI LanGuard

Read 11 GFI LanGuard reviews

1,158 Views
1,146 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Read 85 Microsoft Configuration Manager reviews

9,866 Views
3,157 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

GFI LanGuard

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

Microsoft Configuration Manager SCCM and GFI LanGuard compete in IT management. SCCM holds the upper hand with a comprehensive feature set for enterprises, while GFI LanGuard excels in security-focused tasks.

Features: SCCM provides a centralized management console, integration with Microsoft Intune for mobile management, and advanced reporting capabilities. GFI LanGuard offers effective vulnerability assessment, asset tracking, and patch management, ensuring endpoint security without significant resource consumption.

Room for Improvement: SCCM could benefit from simplifying application deployment without scripts, better integration with non-Microsoft products, and enhancing Linux server patching. GFI LanGuard needs improvement in rollback features, expanded asset tracking, and simplifying multi-user access.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both SCCM and GFI LanGuard primarily operate on-premises, with SCCM supporting hybrid and cloud deployments. SCCM offers extensive resources and community support, though technical support varies. GFI LanGuard provides clear documentation and effective technical support.

Pricing and ROI: SCCM's pricing includes costs for SQL Server licenses, offering good ROI through automation despite the high price. GFI LanGuard's competitive pricing and bundling options make it an attractive choice for vulnerability management.

To learn more, read our detailed GFI LanGuard vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GFI LanGuard vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,853 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

1.0

GFI LanGuard enhances security, compliance, and ROI by streamlining patch management, identifying vulnerabilities, and providing actionable insights.

Sentiment score

1.0

Microsoft Configuration Manager is valued for managing devices, offering cost savings and enhanced productivity, despite some Mac support challenges.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GFI LanGuard report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Configuration Manager report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

4.0

GFI LanGuard's customer service is responsive and helpful, though some regions experience inconsistent technical support quality.

Sentiment score

5.5

Microsoft Configuration Manager receives mixed reviews for support, praised for resources but criticized for first-level support effectiveness.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GFI LanGuard report

Their response time and first-level support quality need improvement.

Jakub J

Systems Architect at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For technical support from Microsoft, I would rate them a nine.

JunedBedrekar

Expert at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Configuration Manager report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

6.7

GFI LanGuard offers scalable flexibility for diverse setups, integrating seamlessly and effectively supporting environments up to 400 users.

Sentiment score

7.6

Microsoft Configuration Manager scales well for enterprises, though expertise and investments may enhance scalability, especially with cloud integration.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GFI LanGuard report

The product is suitable for our size, handling 800 devices.

MikeNelson2

IT Infrastructure Coordinator at NSW Government

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Configuration Manager report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.3

GFI LanGuard is stable and insightful, though remote client challenges on MPLS networks can arise but are manageable.

Sentiment score

6.3

Microsoft Configuration Manager is praised for stability, with issues mostly due to external factors and the need for proper setup.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GFI LanGuard report

There were misconfigurations by our team rather than issues with the product itself.

MikeNelson2

IT Infrastructure Coordinator at NSW Government

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Configuration Manager report

Room For Improvement

GFI LanGuard needs improved network management, better Linux documentation, remote work support, cloud options, and enhanced third-party integrations.

Microsoft Configuration Manager needs improved integration, automation, Linux compatibility, and enhanced PowerShell, UI, mobile support, and AI alerts.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GFI LanGuard report

A better command line interface for Microsoft Configuration Manager would be an additional feature I would to see in the future to make it closer to a perfect score.

Jakub J

Systems Architect at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Improvements are needed for servers. Servers are still not getting it properly, so we could add the servers in Microsoft Configuration Manager for things such as OS deployment and Autopilot as well.

JunedBedrekar

Expert at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Configuration Manager report

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers find GFI LanGuard pricing competitive, with annual costs between $1,000-$2,500 and initial licenses at $21,000.

Microsoft Configuration Manager pricing is high but offers comprehensive features, with value seen mainly for larger infrastructures.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GFI LanGuard report

The setup cost is considered sufficient.

MikeNelson2

IT Infrastructure Coordinator at NSW Government

The pricing for Microsoft Configuration Manager is okay for me.

JunedBedrekar

Expert at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Configuration Manager report

Valuable Features

GFI LanGuard provides comprehensive vulnerability assessment, patch management, and reporting, with user-friendly interface and resource efficiency, improving network security.

Microsoft Configuration Manager offers scalable endpoint management, efficient deployment, vulnerability fixes, and integration, crucial for enterprises with remote operations.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GFI LanGuard report

The most valuable features I find in Microsoft Configuration Manager are mostly patching, deploying software, deploying images, and running custom scripts.

Jakub J

Systems Architect at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Remote management capabilities are useful if the user is not providing access; we can use the backend users to update the group policy and sync the devices.

JunedBedrekar

Expert at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The product valuable for deployment recovery.

MikeNelson2

IT Infrastructure Coordinator at NSW Government

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Configuration Manager report

Categories and Ranking

GFI LanGuard

Ranking in Patch Management

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Ranking in Patch Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Distribution (1st), Server Monitoring (7th), Configuration Management (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of GFI LanGuard is 2.4%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Configuration Manager is 8.6%, down from 15.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Configuration Manager	8.6%
GFI LanGuard	2.4%
Other	89.0%

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Thanu Kishore

Technical Executive at Satcom Infotech

Effective patch management boosts network security and enhances compliance reporting

The product is currently on-premise, and I think the cloud option is still yet to come. If a customer has their own cloud, we can host it there, but the SaaS model is not available, and most companies are requesting the SaaS model for patch management. GFI LanGuard is a good competitor in the market and is popular in my region. We get many leads and numerous requirements for patch management, but most companies ask for the SaaS model, which creates challenges. Third-party app integration needs to be increased in GFI LanGuard. It shouldn't be limited to 30 or 40 applications because there are many applications being used. Instead of manually patching everything, if those patches are included in the product, it would be easier for automatic patching.

Read full review

JunedBedrekar

Expert at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Have effectively deployed patches and applications while integrating with cloud solutions

The features I find most valuable in Microsoft Configuration Manager are replication and scripting. If I want to get a fetch report for anything, such as hardware-related issues or group policy-related issues, I need to fetch the report by using SCCM's scripting language and remediation part. The inventory collection features of Microsoft Configuration Manager are good because we always prefer the inventory. We do it by using the script language. We use remote management capabilities in Microsoft Configuration Manager. Remote management capabilities are useful if the user is not providing access; we can use the backend users to update the group policy and sync the devices. These are the main features we require.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Photography Company

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	64

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GFI LanGuard?

I have not encountered the pricing aspect since I am from the technical side; only the sales team handles the pricing part.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GFI LanGuard?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GFI LanGuard?

My experience with GFI LanGuard involves patch management where, whenever we visit customers, they request patches for both third-party applications and OS systems. When it is on-premise, we can pr...

See all answers

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

See all answers

How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?

ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...

See all answers

What do you like most about SCCM?

One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined ...

See all answers

Comparisons

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 17% of the time

NinjaOne vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 14% of the time

KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 13% of the time

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 9% of the time

More GFI LanGuard Competitors

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 9% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 7% of the time

Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 5% of the time

BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 4% of the time

PDQ Deploy vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Configuration Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GFI LanGuard

December 2025

Download GFI LanGuard product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Configuration Manager

December 2025

Download Microsoft Configuration Manager product report

Also Known As

LanGuard

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM ), Microsoft SMS

Overview

GFI LanGuard enables complete patch management of security and non-security patches to Microsoft operating systems, Mac OS X, major Linux distributions and third-party applications. It can also automate patching for all major web browsers too.

GFI

Microsoft Configuration Manager streamlines IT management with features such as software deployment, patch management, and automation, centralizing operations for Windows environments. Integration with Microsoft products allows efficient oversight of workstations and servers.

Microsoft Configuration Manager provides comprehensive IT management, offering software deployment, patch management, and application pushing. Automation reduces manual tasks, ensuring consistency across systems. Centralized management enables standardized OS deployments, application updates, and configuration integrity. Integration with Microsoft products facilitates seamless operations, while hardware and software inventory, compliance reporting, and remote control functions enhance IT management. Users seek improvements in application deployment for those without deep scripting knowledge and desire better WSUS control, PowerShell and Intune integration, Linux compatibility, and user interface enhancements. Performance improvements are requested for remote user management and third-party application support.

What features enhance Microsoft Configuration Manager?

Software Deployment: Efficiently distribute software across large networks.
Patch Management: Automate and streamline update processes for security and functionality.
Automation Capabilities: Reduce manual effort and enhance consistency in IT tasks.
Centralized Management: Standardize OS deployments and application updates.
Integration with Microsoft Products: Seamless operation with existing Microsoft infrastructure.
Hardware and Software Inventory: Comprehensive tracking for assets and resources.
Compliance Reporting: Ensure compliance with internal and external standards.
Remote Control Functions: Enhance support and troubleshooting capabilities.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Microsoft Configuration Manager?

Decreased Manual Work: Automation reduces time spent on repetitive tasks.
Enhanced Security: Automated patch management keeps systems secure.
Consistent Configurations: Centralized updates ensure uniformity across systems.
Improved Integration: Seamless operation within Microsoft ecosystems boosts productivity.
Comprehensive Oversight: Detailed inventory and reporting tools aid in strategic planning.
Streamlined Support: Remote capabilities improve IT support and user satisfaction.

Microsoft Configuration Manager is widely implemented in organizations to manage Windows workstations and servers. It is essential for deploying operating systems and applications, managing software updates, and conducting hardware and software inventories. The tool is crucial for endpoint and configuration management, ensuring compliance, and automating processes like patching and vulnerability management. Industries such as finance, healthcare, and education rely on Microsoft Configuration Manager to keep systems secure and operational, adapting it to address their specific needs and challenges in maintaining diversified IT environments.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

BayView Medical Clinic, FrugalBrothers Software, Zaw, National Theatre, American Red Cross

Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad

Buyer's Guide

GFI LanGuard vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager

December 2025

Free Report: GFI LanGuard vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about GFI LanGuard vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GFI LanGuard vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.