GFI LanGuard vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune comparison

GFI and Ivanti are both solutions in the Patch Management category. GFI is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0, while Ivanti is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.3. GFI holds a 3.0% mindshare in PM, compared to Ivanti’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of GFI users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

GFI LanGuard

Read 10 GFI LanGuard reviews

1,295 Views
608 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...

Read 11 Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune reviews

1,163 Views
626 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GFI LanGuard

Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

GFI LanGuard and Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune are two prominent patch management solutions. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune leads in terms of features, even though GFI LanGuard is favored for its pricing and support.

Features: Users value GFI LanGuard's comprehensive network security scanning capabilities. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is praised for its seamless integration with Intune and advanced automation. Ivanti Neurons has the upper hand due to its modern architecture and scalability.

Room for Improvement: Users mention the need for a more intuitive system and quicker updates for GFI LanGuard. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune users highlight issues with initial setup complexity and occasional performance lags. Both products could enhance specific functionalities, but Ivanti's setup and performance need more immediate attention.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GFI LanGuard is recognized for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune faces criticism for its complicated deployment steps yet receives credit for effective support once operational. GFI LanGuard offers an easier deployment experience, while Ivanti provides commendable post-deployment support.

Pricing and ROI: GFI LanGuard is noted for its cost-effectiveness and positive ROI, making it appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, despite higher costs, is considered worth the investment due to advanced capabilities. GFI LanGuard presents a more economical choice, whereas Ivanti offers greater long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GFI LanGuard

Ranking in Patch Management

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...

Ranking in Patch Management

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of GFI LanGuard is 3.0%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is 1.5%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Ted Mbugua

Security Manager at CRAG

Improves network visibility and keeps our products up to date with the latest patches

This is a solution that I recommend. In fact, those without it are at a disadvantage when it comes to managing their network. The biggest lesson that I have learned is in terms of visibility. GFI LanGuard has given me a wakeup call in terms of what is happening on endpoint machines. However, it is more than just having visibility. It is about having control in terms of what you want to block and what you're able to block. It keeps our network stable in that there are no running applications that you don't even know you have. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

DddGgggg

Information Technology System Engineer at DRÄXLMAIER Group

Allows us to set maintenance windows and deliver patches

We can set a maintenance window and push the patch. I prefer writing scripts, doing software deployment, pushing it, and distributing applications in servers for the corner of the whole location. We download patches from Ivanti, and it collaborates with more than 700 products. For third-party applications, we download the patches, set a role in our environment, and push it using the maintenance window time and activation date. For software deployment, we receive the service request to install and prepare scripts and then push it in many locations according and relevant to the service request for each location. The group or collection devices are affected by the policy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is helpful to patch and scan vulnerabilities."

"I like that the solution can block users from unnecessarily putting devices on the network."

"The most valuable features of GFI LanGuard are the vulnerability assessment, it provides us with substantial insight into what applications are running on the endpoint systems and what vulnerabilities are there in the running applications. The second would be the assets tracking. I'm able to see in the network whether my endpoint server is operating and if all the other IT equipment is running in the environment. Additionally, GFI LanGuard is not heavy on system resources. It gives a competitive advantage over others."

"The initial setup was easy."

"The most valuable feature of GFI LanGuard is its email spam feature."

"The most valuable feature is that I am able to patch third-party solutions."

"The most valuable features in GFI LanGuard are patch management and vulnerability assessment."

"The most useful features of GFI LanGuard are vulnerability assessment and patching solutions."

More GFI LanGuard pros

"We can set a maintenance window and push the patch."

"Both in terms of features and operations, this is a good solution."

"Ivanti Patch's most valuable features are the patch module and the package distribution."

"The technical support from Ivanti is good."

"I like the product's Peer to Peer patching feature."

"The most valuable features are device management and support for upgrading applications."

"The solution is a good product and I have heard that the interface is more friendly than that of Windows."

"I have found the interface and ease of use valuable features. Additionally, it is very easy to patch VMs and other systems, such a Linux. We are able to do patches even without the internet manually."

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune pros

Cons

"If GFI LanGuard had a cloud version it would be better for people that are working from home."

"The documentation on how to use this solution in a Linux environment is not clear, which is something that should be improved because it is complicated."

"The only drawback with GFI LanGuard is that you cannot directly integrate it from the Outlook email; instead, you have to first log in to the site to make changes."

"When you want to uninstall software from an endpoint, sometimes it becomes very problematic."

"GFI LanGuard has some technical limitations with machines."

"GFI LanGuard could improve the rollback feature. If we have installed the wrong we have had some issues with the rollback function. Additionally, more input from GFI LanGuard for the custom software push install."

"This solution is limited to the local area network only and cannot manage remote devices."

"GFI LanGuard can improve by adding asset tracking."

More GFI LanGuard cons

"It's a difficult configuration because you need to install many servers in a location, and you have to install the primary server in the main location."

"I tried to be a partner of Ivanti and, from this vantage point, the quotes are, perhaps, a bit high."

"Customers sometimes ask about non-existent features, and we pass these requests on to Ivanti."

"I would like to have better support for the application."

"There are times when there is an update that causes some issues. These issues should be sorted out before the release."

"Ivanti Patch could be improved with better integration with other cloud solutions."

"In terms of improvement, I would recommend better documentation. During the time I used it, there were issues with up-to-date patching, and the documentation around those specific errors was quite confusing."

"The reports have to show the compliance level of the patching, which Ivanti does not provide."

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"GFI LanGuard cost approximately $1,000 annually to use the solution."

"On a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being competitive, I would rate the price as a four."

"We are a gold partner and we receive favorable discounts. The price of GFI LanGuard is competitive. When you evaluate other solutions, such as ManageEngine."

"I rate the pricing of GFI LanGuard a four out of five."

"GFI LanGuard isn't expensive."

"GFI LanGuard has very fair pricing compared to other similar solutions out there."

"The solution is expensive compared to other products."

"The solution is affordable."

"While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."

"For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."

"The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Photography Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Government

13%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GFI LanGuard?

The most valuable feature of GFI LanGuard is its email spam feature.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GFI LanGuard?

The only drawback with GFI LanGuard is that you cannot directly integrate it from the Outlook email; instead, you have to first log in to the site to make changes. Instead of directly white listing...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GFI LanGuard?

Internally, as a user, I use GFI LanGuard for email and web monitoring.

See all answers

What do you like most about Ivanti Patch for Windows?

We use the solution for security patching of Windows devices.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Patch for Windows?

In terms of improvement, I would recommend better documentation. During the time I used it, there were issues with up-to-date patching, and the documentation around those specific errors was quite ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Ivanti Patch for Windows?

The only downside I found regarding technical support was the time zone difference. Since we are two hours behind, we occasionally had to wait until the next morning for assistance. I would rate th...

See all answers

Comparisons

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 35% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 24% of the time

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 15% of the time

NinjaOne vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 11% of the time

More GFI LanGuard Competitors

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 44% of the time

Ivanti Security Controls vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 30% of the time

Automox vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 26% of the time

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GFI LanGuard

April 2025

Download GFI LanGuard product report

Buyer's Guide

Patch Management

March 2025

Download Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune product report

Also Known As

LanGuard

Ivanti Patch for Windows, Patch for Windows, Shavlik Patch for Windows

Overview

GFI LanGuard enables complete patch management of security and non-security patches to Microsoft operating systems, Mac OS X, major Linux distributions and third-party applications. It can also automate patching for all major web browsers too.

GFI

Better protect against threats that stem from vulnerabilities in third-party applications.

Improve protection against threats that stem from vulnerabilities in third-party applications by extending Intune with risk-based third-party patch publishing – without any additional infrastructure.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

BayView Medical Clinic, FrugalBrothers Software, Zaw, National Theatre, American Red Cross

Presbyterian Church

Buyer's Guide

GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

April 2025

Free Report: GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Find out what your peers are saying about GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.