GFI LanGuard vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune comparison

GFI and Ivanti are both solutions in the Patch Management category. GFI is ranked #16, while Ivanti is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.0. GFI holds a 2.5% mindshare in PM, compared to Ivanti’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of GFI users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

GFI LanGuard

Read 11 GFI LanGuard reviews

1,330 Views
1,317 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...

Read 11 Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune reviews

1,067 Views
1,067 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GFI LanGuard

Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

GFI LanGuard and Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune are two prominent patch management solutions. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune leads in terms of features, even though GFI LanGuard is favored for its pricing and support.

Features: Users value GFI LanGuard's comprehensive network security scanning capabilities. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is praised for its seamless integration with Intune and advanced automation. Ivanti Neurons has the upper hand due to its modern architecture and scalability.

Room for Improvement: Users mention the need for a more intuitive system and quicker updates for GFI LanGuard. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune users highlight issues with initial setup complexity and occasional performance lags. Both products could enhance specific functionalities, but Ivanti's setup and performance need more immediate attention.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GFI LanGuard is recognized for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune faces criticism for its complicated deployment steps yet receives credit for effective support once operational. GFI LanGuard offers an easier deployment experience, while Ivanti provides commendable post-deployment support.

Pricing and ROI: GFI LanGuard is noted for its cost-effectiveness and positive ROI, making it appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, despite higher costs, is considered worth the investment due to advanced capabilities. GFI LanGuard presents a more economical choice, whereas Ivanti offers greater long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,264 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GFI LanGuard

Ranking in Patch Management

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...

Ranking in Patch Management

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of GFI LanGuard is 2.5%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is 2.6%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune	2.6%
GFI LanGuard	2.5%
Other	94.9%

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Thanu Kishore

Technical Executive at Satcom Infotech

Effective patch management boosts network security and enhances compliance reporting

The product is currently on-premise, and I think the cloud option is still yet to come. If a customer has their own cloud, we can host it there, but the SaaS model is not available, and most companies are requesting the SaaS model for patch management. GFI LanGuard is a good competitor in the market and is popular in my region. We get many leads and numerous requirements for patch management, but most companies ask for the SaaS model, which creates challenges. Third-party app integration needs to be increased in GFI LanGuard. It shouldn't be limited to 30 or 40 applications because there are many applications being used. Instead of manually patching everything, if those patches are included in the product, it would be easier for automatic patching.

Read full review

Phung Anh

IT Administrator at FPT Software Strategic Unit no 17

Keeping servers updated while encountering documentation issues and time zone delays in support

In terms of improvement, I would recommend better documentation. During the time I used it, there were issues with up-to-date patching, and the documentation around those specific errors was quite confusing. Sometimes I had to uninstall, reinstall, or engage technical support, which took a lot of time. It would be helpful if the documentation could easily help us fix bugs on our own.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"GFI LanGuard has given me a wakeup call in terms of what is happening on endpoint machines."

"The most valuable feature of GFI LanGuard is its email spam feature."

"We chose GFI LanGuard out of the three because of the quick support, ease of deployment and use, and it is less technical than the others."

"The initial setup was easy."

"The most useful features of GFI LanGuard are vulnerability assessment and patching solutions."

"I was previously using ManageEngine and we switched to GFI LanGuard because it was less expensive, had the same feature sets, and an additional vulnerability assessment feature."

"The most valuable feature is that I am able to patch third-party solutions."

"The most valuable features in GFI LanGuard are patch management and vulnerability assessment."

More GFI LanGuard pros

"I like the product's Peer to Peer patching feature."

"The most valuable features are device management and support for upgrading applications."

"I have found the interface and ease of use valuable features, and it is very easy to patch VMs and other systems, such as Linux, and we are able to do patches even without the internet manually."

"We can set a maintenance window and push the patch."

"Both in terms of features and operations, this is a good solution."

"The solution is a good product and I have heard that the interface is more friendly than that of Windows."

"Both in terms of features and operations, this is a good solution."

"We use the solution for security patching of Windows devices."

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune pros

Cons

"GFI LanGuard can improve by adding more modules, such as asset control or asset inventory."

"GFI LanGuard has some technical limitations with machines."

"GFI LanGuard can improve by adding asset tracking."

"The documentation on how to use this solution in a Linux environment is not clear, which is something that should be improved because it is complicated."

"GFI LanGuard can improve by adding asset tracking."

"The only drawback with GFI LanGuard is that you cannot directly integrate it from the Outlook email; instead, you have to first log in to the site to make changes."

"The main reason for considering making the change is because the solution is limited only to the LAN, and I have many remote users who are not on my LAN."

"GFI LanGuard could improve the rollback feature. If we have installed the wrong we have had some issues with the rollback function."

More GFI LanGuard cons

"Ivanti Patch could be improved with better integration with other cloud solutions."

"There are times when there is an update that causes some issues. These issues should be sorted out before the release."

"The reports have to show the compliance level of the patching, which Ivanti does not provide."

"Customers sometimes ask about non-existent features, and we pass these requests on to Ivanti."

"Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune needs to improve stability. We had issues with patching."

"I tried to be a partner of Ivanti and, from this vantage point, the quotes are, perhaps, a bit high."

"It's a difficult configuration because you need to install many servers in a location, and you have to install the primary server in the main location."

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being competitive, I would rate the price as a four."

"GFI LanGuard cost approximately $1,000 annually to use the solution."

"I rate the pricing of GFI LanGuard a four out of five."

"GFI LanGuard has very fair pricing compared to other similar solutions out there."

"GFI LanGuard isn't expensive."

"We are a gold partner and we receive favorable discounts. The price of GFI LanGuard is competitive. When you evaluate other solutions, such as ManageEngine."

"While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."

"The solution is expensive compared to other products."

"The solution is affordable."

"The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."

"For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Photography Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Transportation Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GFI LanGuard?

I have not encountered the pricing aspect since I am from the technical side; only the sales team handles the pricing part.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GFI LanGuard?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GFI LanGuard?

My experience with GFI LanGuard involves patch management where, whenever we visit customers, they request patches for both third-party applications and OS systems. When it is on-premise, we can pr...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Patch for Windows?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Ivanti Patch for Windows?

The only downside I found regarding technical support was the time zone difference. Since we are two hours behind, we occasionally had to wait until the next morning for assistance. I would rate th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Patch for Windows?

The primary use case of Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune ( /products/ivanti-neurons-patch-for-intune-reviews ) was primarily for updating all servers, ensuring that both main servers and production ...

See all answers

Comparisons

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 12% of the time

KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 11% of the time

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 4% of the time

More GFI LanGuard Competitors

PDQ Deploy vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 12% of the time

Ivanti Security Controls vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 7% of the time

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GFI LanGuard

March 2026

Download GFI LanGuard product report

Buyer's Guide

Patch Management

March 2026

Download Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune product report

Also Known As

LanGuard

Ivanti Patch for Windows, Patch for Windows, Shavlik Patch for Windows

Overview

GFI LanGuard enables complete patch management of security and non-security patches to Microsoft operating systems, Mac OS X, major Linux distributions and third-party applications. It can also automate patching for all major web browsers too.

GFI

Better protect against threats that stem from vulnerabilities in third-party applications.

Improve protection against threats that stem from vulnerabilities in third-party applications by extending Intune with risk-based third-party patch publishing – without any additional infrastructure.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

BayView Medical Clinic, FrugalBrothers Software, Zaw, National Theatre, American Red Cross

Presbyterian Church

Buyer's Guide

GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

March 2026

Free Report: GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Find out what your peers are saying about GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.