Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GFI LanGuard vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune comparison

GFI and Ivanti are both solutions in the Patch Management category. GFI is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while Ivanti is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.3. GFI holds a 2.4% mindshare in PM, compared to Ivanti’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of GFI users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.
GFI LanGuard
Read 10 GFI LanGuard reviews
  • 1,164 Views
  • 1,164 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...
Read 11 Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune reviews
  • 838 Views
  • 838 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

GFI LanGuard and Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune are two prominent patch management solutions. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune leads in terms of features, even though GFI LanGuard is favored for its pricing and support.

Features: Users value GFI LanGuard's comprehensive network security scanning capabilities. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is praised for its seamless integration with Intune and advanced automation. Ivanti Neurons has the upper hand due to its modern architecture and scalability.

Room for Improvement: Users mention the need for a more intuitive system and quicker updates for GFI LanGuard. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune users highlight issues with initial setup complexity and occasional performance lags. Both products could enhance specific functionalities, but Ivanti's setup and performance need more immediate attention.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GFI LanGuard is recognized for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune faces criticism for its complicated deployment steps yet receives credit for effective support once operational. GFI LanGuard offers an easier deployment experience, while Ivanti provides commendable post-deployment support.

Pricing and ROI: GFI LanGuard is noted for its cost-effectiveness and positive ROI, making it appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, despite higher costs, is considered worth the investment due to advanced capabilities. GFI LanGuard presents a more economical choice, whereas Ivanti offers greater long-term value.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,825 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

GFI LanGuard
Ranking in Patch Management
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...
Ranking in Patch Management
13th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of GFI LanGuard is 2.4%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is 1.6%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

Ted Mbugua - PeerSpot reviewer
Highly stable, quick support, and useful modules
My advice to others wanting to implement this solution is you do not have to be very technical to use it. When installing it, you only need to click next. Additionally, the support is helpful and knowledgeable. Their technical documentation is easily accessible. I rate GFI LanGuard an eight out of ten.
Read full review
DddGgggg - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows us to set maintenance windows and deliver patches
We can set a maintenance window and push the patch. I prefer writing scripts, doing software deployment, pushing it, and distributing applications in servers for the corner of the whole location. We download patches from Ivanti, and it collaborates with more than 700 products. For third-party applications, we download the patches, set a role in our environment, and push it using the maintenance window time and activation date. For software deployment, we receive the service request to install and prepare scripts and then push it in many locations according and relevant to the service request for each location. The group or collection devices are affected by the policy.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most useful features of GFI LanGuard are vulnerability assessment and patching solutions."
"The solution is easy to use and integrates well with other operating systems."
"The most valuable features in GFI LanGuard are patch management and vulnerability assessment."
"The most valuable feature of GFI LanGuard is its email spam feature."
"The most valuable features of GFI LanGuard are the vulnerability assessment, it provides us with substantial insight into what applications are running on the endpoint systems and what vulnerabilities are there in the running applications. The second would be the assets tracking. I'm able to see in the network whether my endpoint server is operating and if all the other IT equipment is running in the environment. Additionally, GFI LanGuard is not heavy on system resources. It gives a competitive advantage over others."
"I like that the solution can block users from unnecessarily putting devices on the network."
"It is helpful to patch and scan vulnerabilities."
"The initial setup was easy."
More GFI LanGuard pros
"Both in terms of features and operations, this is a good solution."
"The solution is a good product and I have heard that the interface is more friendly than that of Windows."
"The most valuable features are device management and support for upgrading applications."
"We use the solution for security patching of Windows devices."
"I like the product's Peer to Peer patching feature."
"The technical support from Ivanti is good."
"Ivanti Patch's most valuable features are the patch module and the package distribution."
"I have found the interface and ease of use valuable features. Additionally, it is very easy to patch VMs and other systems, such a Linux. We are able to do patches even without the internet manually."
More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune pros
 

Cons

"If GFI LanGuard had a cloud version it would be better for people that are working from home."
"GFI LanGuard has some technical limitations with machines."
"The documentation on how to use this solution in a Linux environment is not clear, which is something that should be improved because it is complicated."
"When you want to uninstall software from an endpoint, sometimes it becomes very problematic."
"The version we are using only allows one person to use it at a time and does not allow multi-users."
"This solution is limited to the local area network only and cannot manage remote devices."
"GFI LanGuard can improve by adding more modules, such as asset control or asset inventory."
"The only drawback with GFI LanGuard is that you cannot directly integrate it from the Outlook email; instead, you have to first log in to the site to make changes."
More GFI LanGuard cons
"The reports have to show the compliance level of the patching, which Ivanti does not provide."
"There are times when there is an update that causes some issues. These issues should be sorted out before the release."
"Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune needs to improve stability. We had issues with patching."
"Customers sometimes ask about non-existent features, and we pass these requests on to Ivanti."
"It's a difficult configuration because you need to install many servers in a location, and you have to install the primary server in the main location."
"I tried to be a partner of Ivanti and, from this vantage point, the quotes are, perhaps, a bit high."
"The product's support and configuration need to improve. It needs to be more scalable."
"In terms of improvement, I would recommend better documentation. During the time I used it, there were issues with up-to-date patching, and the documentation around those specific errors was quite confusing."
More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being competitive, I would rate the price as a four."
"GFI LanGuard isn't expensive."
"GFI LanGuard has very fair pricing compared to other similar solutions out there."
"I rate the pricing of GFI LanGuard a four out of five."
"GFI LanGuard cost approximately $1,000 annually to use the solution."
"We are a gold partner and we receive favorable discounts. The price of GFI LanGuard is competitive. When you evaluate other solutions, such as ManageEngine."
"While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."
"The solution is affordable."
"The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."
"For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."
"The solution is expensive compared to other products."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,825 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Photography Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GFI LanGuard?
The most valuable feature of GFI LanGuard is its email spam feature.
See all answers
What needs improvement with GFI LanGuard?
The only drawback with GFI LanGuard is that you cannot directly integrate it from the Outlook email; instead, you have to first log in to the site to make changes. Instead of directly white listing...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for GFI LanGuard?
Internally, as a user, I use GFI LanGuard for email and web monitoring.
See all answers
What do you like most about Ivanti Patch for Windows?
We use the solution for security patching of Windows devices.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Ivanti Patch for Windows?
In terms of improvement, I would recommend better documentation. During the time I used it, there were issues with up-to-date patching, and the documentation around those specific errors was quite ...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Ivanti Patch for Windows?
The only downside I found regarding technical support was the time zone difference. Since we are two hours behind, we occasionally had to wait until the next morning for assistance. I would rate th...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs GFI LanGuard Logo
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs GFI LanGuard
Compared 39% of the time
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs GFI LanGuard Logo
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs GFI LanGuard
Compared 25% of the time
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs GFI LanGuard Logo
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs GFI LanGuard
Compared 14% of the time
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs GFI LanGuard Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs GFI LanGuard
Compared 13% of the time
NinjaOne vs GFI LanGuard Logo
NinjaOne vs GFI LanGuard
Compared 10% of the time
More GFI LanGuard Competitors
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune
Compared 30% of the time
Ivanti Security Controls vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Logo
Ivanti Security Controls vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune
Compared 30% of the time
Automox vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Logo
Automox vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune
Compared 23% of the time
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Logo
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune
Compared 17% of the time
More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
GFI LanGuard
June 2025
GFI LanGuard reportDownload GFI LanGuard product report
Buyer's Guide
Patch Management
June 2025
Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune reportDownload Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune product report
 

Also Known As

LanGuard
Ivanti Patch for Windows, Patch for Windows, Shavlik Patch for Windows
 

Overview

GFI LanGuard enables complete patch management of security and non-security patches to Microsoft operating systems, Mac OS X, major Linux distributions and third-party applications. It can also automate patching for all major web browsers too.

GFI

Better protect against threats that stem from vulnerabilities in third-party applications.

Improve protection against threats that stem from vulnerabilities in third-party applications by extending Intune with risk-based third-party patch publishing – without any additional infrastructure.

Ivanti
 

Sample Customers

BayView Medical Clinic, FrugalBrothers Software, Zaw, National Theatre, American Red Cross
Presbyterian Church
Buyer's Guide
GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune
June 2025
Free Report: GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune
Find out what your peers are saying about GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,825 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.