Frontegg vs Thales Authenticators comparison

Frontegg and Thales are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Frontegg is ranked #36, while Thales is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0. Frontegg holds a 0.6% mindshare in AS, compared to Thales’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Frontegg users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Thales users who would recommend it.

Frontegg

Read 6 Frontegg reviews

813 Views
244 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Thales Authenticators

Read 6 Thales Authenticators reviews

1,196 Views
945 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Frontegg

Thales Authenticators

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Thales Authenticators and Frontegg are authentication solutions with distinct benefits. Thales is preferred for reliability and security, while Frontegg stands out for its comprehensive feature set.

What features are offered by Thales Authenticators in comparison to Frontegg?

Thales Authenticators provide robust authentication protocols, high security integration, and reliable operations. Frontegg offers a range of developer-friendly tools, high flexibility, and versatile features.

What areas of improvement can be found in Thales Authenticators in comparison to Frontegg?

Thales Authenticators need better customization options, more user management features, and increased flexibility. Frontegg requires enhanced documentation, more intuitive navigation, and improved user guidance.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Thales Authenticators in comparison to Frontegg?

Thales Authenticators has straightforward deployment but lacks immediate comprehensive support. Frontegg’s deployment is smooth with superior customer service and support, making it more user-friendly.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Thales Authenticators in comparison to Frontegg?

Thales Authenticators have a higher initial setup cost but deliver consistent ROI over time. Frontegg offers competitive setup costs with quicker ROI due to its extensive features, providing better value for money.

To learn more, read our detailed Frontegg vs. Thales Authenticators Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Thales Authenticators

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Frontegg

Ranking in Authentication Systems

36th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (19th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (13th)

Thales Authenticators

Ranking in Authentication Systems

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Frontegg is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Thales Authenticators is 2.3%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Thales Authenticators	2.3%
Frontegg	0.6%
Other	97.1%

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

reviewer1660836

DevOps Manager at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system

It would be nice to have a export button to file with all tenants/users so that in case of a disaster we will have the option to restore the users from file. For security certifications, we need to make sure we can restore all of our products and data in minimal time. We are backing up the data using the API but it will be better to export everything to an external file so in case of a disaster or mistake from our side, we can have the option to reload all the users and assign them to the relevant tenant as fast as possible

Read full review

Gustavo Merighi

Automation and Telecommunications Analyst at Grupo Energisa

Has an easy-to-use management interface and a straightforward initial setup process

Our primary use cases include multifactor authentication for VPN connections and access to security tools like jump servers and firewalls. We also use it to enhance security measures in an enterprise environment The most valuable feature is the YAML 2.0 integration. It has an easy-to-use…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Every feature is multi-tenant by design, making different customer requests effortless to provide."

"Their developers were always willing to meet even though we are in very different time zones."

"The MFA policy via Frontegg allows us to enable/disable/enforce the Multi-Factor Authentication policy of our users and to enhance security and adhere to modern standards."

"We like the SSO, permissions and roles, multiple workspaces, and react login components."

"It has Audit Log and many cool features that if we were to develop them by ourselves, it would require a lot of research and development resources. Frontegg gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system in which they can also manage some of the features and roles by themself which gives them more control over their environment."

"The admin portal layer is super useful and saves valuable front-end development time."

"Scalable and stable."

"The most valuable feature of SafeNet Authentication Manager is authentication."

"We use this solution to log into virtual machines like VMware and VMware Horizon."

"One valuable feature is Thales' ability to provide off-site tokens."

"I like how the solution allows me to support different types of hardware tokens and integrate with OTP."

"The technical support services are good."

Cons

"Frontegg is fairly stable, however, we are looking forward to some promised capabilities, such as more tightly integrated Feature Flag support."

"We're hoping to see more user management-related features, according to Frontegg's roadmap."

"We really like the ability to add the same user across tenants. From a UX perspective, the flow can be betterized."

"The web interface is missing a way to delete a workspace. I have accidentally created a workspace and was not able to delete it. It's a minor thing that should be supported."

"It would be nice to have a backup export with all tenant/users so that in case of a mistake we can have the option to restore the users."

"The PHP SDK is limited. It's not a huge deal as we can just use their web API directly, but it is something to note if you're using PHP.‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎"

"We faced issues due to slow ticket responses, which improved over time."

"The problem with SafeNet is that it's not integrated with Microsoft 365."

"Lacks integration with other platforms."

"The stability could improve."

"The solution should allow for support of multi-tenant architecture."

"The product could be improved by adding more features for sending tokens via SMS or phone calls."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"There is an annual licensing fee."

"Thales is more expensive than its competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Thales Authenticators?

Currently, the solution fulfills our requirements. We are very satisfied with its features, and do not have any specific ideas for improvement right now. Perhaps, in the future, three-factor authen...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Thales Authenticators?

Our employees, whether working on-site or remotely, use Thales Authenticators for two-factor authentication to log in to their laptops or PCs. This is our primary use case.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Thales Authenticators?

From our past years of experience, the solution is very smooth, and we have had a good experience with it. We would definitely recommend Thales to others for its reliability and features. I'd rate ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Auth0 vs Frontegg

Compared 46% of the time

WorkOS vs Frontegg

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Frontegg

Compared 17% of the time

Clerk.com vs Frontegg

Compared 10% of the time

Descope vs Frontegg

Compared 9% of the time

More Frontegg Competitors

Utimaco SecurityServer vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 24% of the time

Yubico YubiKey vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 21% of the time

Atalla Hardware Security Module vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 7% of the time

RSA SecurID vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 6% of the time

More Thales Authenticators Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

September 2025

Download Frontegg product report

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

September 2025

Download Thales Authenticators product report

Also Known As

No data available

Gemalto Ezio, Ezio, Gemalto Authenticators, SafeNet Authentication Manager

Overview

Frontegg is a user management platform, designed for the Product-Led Growth (PLG) era. Frontegg provides blazing-fast integration of a powerful user infrastructure, designed to handle modern application use-cases.

Our platform supports app builders by covering all the way from fundamental authentication flows to the most advanced capabilities such as complex organizational structures (multi-tenancy), fine-grained authorization, API-token management, self-service admin portal for end-users, subscription enforcement, single-sign-on (SSO), and much more.

Frontegg’s interfaces are embedded as a UI layer within your app and becomes a customer-facing management interface for your end-users, both on the personal and workspace levels. Frontegg also powers-up your backend through rich SDKs supported in various languages and frameworks.

Pricing: Starts at $249/m

Frontegg

Offering the broadest range of authentication methods and form factors, Thales allows customers to address numerous use cases, assurance levels, and threat vectors with unified, centrally managed policies—managed from one authentication back end delivered in the cloud or on premise.

Thales

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Standard Chartered Bank (SCB)

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Thales Authenticators

September 2025

Free Report: Frontegg vs. Thales Authenticators

Find out what your peers are saying about Frontegg vs. Thales Authenticators and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Frontegg vs. Thales Authenticators report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.