Frontegg vs Kaseya AuthAnvil comparison

Frontegg and Kaseya are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Frontegg is ranked #22, while Kaseya is ranked #37. Frontegg holds a 1.6% mindshare in SSO, compared to Kaseya’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Frontegg users are willing to recommend the solution.

Frontegg

Read 6 Frontegg reviews

1,084 Views
780 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kaseya AuthAnvil

391 Views
242 Comparison Views

Frontegg

Kaseya AuthAnvil

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Frontegg and Kaseya AuthAnvil based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Okta, Cisco and others in Single Sign-On (SSO).

To learn more, read our detailed Single Sign-On (SSO) Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,837 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Frontegg

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

22nd

Ranking in Authentication Systems

38th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (12th)

Kaseya AuthAnvil

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

37th

Ranking in Authentication Systems

53rd

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Frontegg is 1.6%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya AuthAnvil is 0.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Frontegg	1.6%
Kaseya AuthAnvil	0.9%
Other	97.5%

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

it_user1660836

DevOps Manager at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system

It would be nice to have a export button to file with all tenants/users so that in case of a disaster we will have the option to restore the users from file. For security certifications, we need to make sure we can restore all of our products and data in minimal time. We are backing up the data using the API but it will be better to export everything to an external file so in case of a disaster or mistake from our side, we can have the option to reload all the users and assign them to the relevant tenant as fast as possible

Read full review

Use Kaseya AuthAnvil?

Leave a review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8

No data available

Comparisons

Auth0 Platform vs Frontegg

Compared 19% of the time

Okta Platform vs Frontegg

Compared 15% of the time

WorkOS vs Frontegg

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Frontegg

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Frontegg

Compared 9% of the time

More Frontegg Competitors

Okta Platform vs Kaseya AuthAnvil

Compared 32% of the time

Cisco Duo vs Kaseya AuthAnvil

Compared 17% of the time

LastPass Business vs Kaseya AuthAnvil

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Kaseya AuthAnvil

Compared 14% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Kaseya AuthAnvil

Compared 12% of the time

More Kaseya AuthAnvil Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

March 2026

Download Frontegg product report

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

March 2026

Download Kaseya AuthAnvil product report

Overview

Frontegg is a user management platform, designed for the Product-Led Growth (PLG) era. Frontegg provides blazing-fast integration of a powerful user infrastructure, designed to handle modern application use-cases.

Our platform supports app builders by covering all the way from fundamental authentication flows to the most advanced capabilities such as complex organizational structures (multi-tenancy), fine-grained authorization, API-token management, self-service admin portal for end-users, subscription enforcement, single-sign-on (SSO), and much more.

Frontegg’s interfaces are embedded as a UI layer within your app and becomes a customer-facing management interface for your end-users, both on the personal and workspace levels. Frontegg also powers-up your backend through rich SDKs supported in various languages and frameworks.

Pricing: Starts at $249/m

Frontegg

Remembering passwords for so many different applications is impossible. Users often reuse the same weak passwords, and take too much of IT’s time resetting them when forgotten. Onboarding and removing users is also a very time consuming task. Kaseya AuthAnvil makes provisioning and deprovisioning users a snap, giving IT more time back in their day.

Kaseya

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Okta, Cisco and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors and best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.