Fortra's Intermapper vs Pandora FMS comparison

Fortra and Pandora FMS are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Fortra is ranked #82, while Pandora FMS is ranked #74. Fortra holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to Pandora FMS’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Pandora FMS users who would recommend it.

Fortra's Intermapper

Read 4 Fortra's Intermapper reviews

524 Views
477 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Pandora FMS

Read 22 Pandora FMS reviews

1,347 Views
700 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortra's Intermapper

Pandora FMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Fortra's Intermapper and Pandora FMS are leading competitors in the network monitoring tools category. Based on the data, Pandora FMS seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, making it favorable for advanced monitoring needs despite a higher price point.

Features: Fortra's Intermapper is known for real-time network mapping, intuitive visualizations, and a minimal learning curve. Pandora FMS is recognized for extensive scalability features, customizable alerting, and a wide range of integrations, providing adaptability and advanced monitoring capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Fortra's Intermapper could enhance its scalability, offer more customization in alerts, and expand integration options. Pandora FMS might improve on simplifying its setup process, reducing its initial costs, and streamlining user interfaces for better ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortra's Intermapper offers a straightforward deployment process with efficient customer support resolving issues quickly. Pandora FMS provides a flexible deployment model with comprehensive service options but may involve a longer setup time, matched by extensive support.

Pricing and ROI: Fortra's Intermapper offers a lower upfront cost, thus more cost-effective with a swift ROI. Pandora FMS requires a higher initial investment but delivers substantial returns through expansive features over time, emphasizing long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortra's Intermapper vs. Pandora FMS Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fortra's Intermapper vs. Pandora FMS

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,771 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortra's Intermapper

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

82nd

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Pandora FMS

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

74th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (23rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (54th), Log Management (57th), Cloud Monitoring Software (40th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Fortra's Intermapper is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pandora FMS is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Pandora FMS	0.6%
Fortra's Intermapper	0.4%
Other	99.0%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Andrian Lubimov

SVP of Networking and Operations at Skywire Networks

It tremendously cuts down our troubleshooting timeframe, but needs advanced SLA monitoring and reporting

They can do a better job with SLA reporting. It does some basic reporting, but it really doesn't offer the ability to monitor devices by groups, customers, or carrier to give an overall health performance of specifically-defined environments. That's where HelpSystems Intermapper could have done a better job. I would love to see advanced SLA monitoring and reporting in this solution. They already have a lot of ingredients. They already have SNMP polling. It is really about what people are looking for from SLA monitoring, especially someone who looks at the network topology. You want to see your endpoints. You want to see half of your endpoints by simply analyzing ICMP or SNMP-based availability of your endpoints. Having an ability to define your group and how you bring devices into your group would be a huge benefit.

Read full review

Gabriel Glusgold

Asociado/ at Infraestructura Informática

Personalized metrics; simplicity of data

My primary use case for Pandora is monitoring This solution has helped us improve our organization by allowing us to create a lot of metrics on several platforms, including Windows, Linux, and Unix. We then use these Pandora metrics to create an interface. We then pass the interface off to the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What is really cool about HelpSystems InterMapper is that because of its SNMP base, you can integrate all different makes and models on the same map. You, of course, can have more than one map, but you have an option to have visibility into the entire network from one centralized system. You can monitor IPs, routers, radios, DC power plants, and UPS. You can do it all from one network management and monitoring solution. That's what really makes HelpSystems Intermapper great. Another great thing about HelpSystems InterMapper is that you can really bundle different probes under one device. You can have a bundled device. You can monitor the physical status of a host based on the IP availability. You can also monitor services and actually see if anything happens. You can quickly determine whether it is the application layer, host layer, or network layer. HelpSystems Intermapper gives such a unique representation of a network. Ever since we started using HelpSystems InterMapper, we don't have to document everything in a detailed format and store it somewhere. Right now, it is really a combination of network topology, network monitoring, and network analyzing. So, in my opinion, it is awesome. When you have your SNMP topology defined, you don't require a dedicated NMS engineer to manage your system, which is another great thing about HelpSystems InterMapper. I see how our operators get so excited by having the ability to map a device or interface and connect interfaces together. HelpSystems InterMapper is also very operator friendly; not just user friendly, but also operator friendly. This is a unique feature, and it works really great."

"It's all today portal-based which is a good feature for us."

"It's a nice graphical interface, a nice map, that relates Layer 1 to Layer 3, virtually instantly, to the Helpdesk support staff. It provides a default place to get critical information so we can deploy our staff."

"The most valuable features are its: log history, real-time monitoring capabilities, accuracy - the number of false positives is very low, and the mapping features."

"We are able to control our business with this all-in-one monitoring tool."

"Thanks to its flexibility, I have been able to adapt the tool to our servers and find out quickly how their console works."

"The official forum is active enough to answer most of the high-end technical questions that you may have."

"Pandora's architecture is interesting. It's open so you can easily extend and enhance it. It's simpler to customize Pandora compared to other solutions. It's also scalable enough to support large environments."

"The network monitoring and configuration within this solution is very good."

"The administration of the console is very easy. I like that Pandora FMS is interactive and easy to manage."

"Thanks to this software and to the work of the support team, we have everything under control."

"The monitoring system within this solution is very good. It is easy to use and navigate, and makes issue alarms easily viewable."

More Pandora FMS pros

Cons

"I'd love to see more of the network management side of it coming back into it. If we were able to run scripts to bounce ports on switches, that would be great. It's asking a lot, but it's actually very doable because I do it through scripting into other products. If we could incorporate that directly into Intermapper, that would be fantastic."

"They can do a better job with SLA reporting. It does some basic reporting, but it really doesn't offer the ability to monitor devices by groups, customers, or carrier to give an overall health performance of specifically-defined environments. That's where HelpSystems Intermapper could have done a better job. I would love to see advanced SLA monitoring and reporting in this solution. They already have a lot of ingredients. They already have SNMP polling. It is really about what people are looking for from SLA monitoring, especially someone who looks at the network topology. You want to see your endpoints. You want to see half of your endpoints by simply analyzing ICMP or SNMP-based availability of your endpoints. Having an ability to define your group and how you bring devices into your group would be a huge benefit."

"It's a smaller solution so tools are not as advanced as you would find in a larger solution"

"When it comes to the definition of local Software Agents for the first time in the open-source version, it can become very tedious."

"We would like to see improvement in the mainframe integration that this solution is capable of."

"I would like for the solution to be faster and have a better tolerance between parallel servers for Pandora and Pest Control."

"In the future, we may have double the number of devices, and we do not want to have any issues with performance in the data display."

"The price for Pandora FMS is expensive."

"I find that this software is resource heavy, and demands a lot of processing capacity."

"Pandora could deliver better analytics out of the box. You can work around these limitations with the help of other tools like Grafana. The shortcomings are mostly on the graphical side. The built-in report generators are a bit limited in some areas."

"We would like the real-time monitoring of an interface to be improved within this solution."

More Pandora FMS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"In terms of money, the Enterprise version is the cheapest that I have found after a market study."

"My rule of thumb would be that if you need more than thirty agents, and you lack an automation tool such as Chef or Puppet, you will save a lot of time and money going to the Enterprise edition."

"Only one payment and it includes support, updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of plugins except for SAP and z/OS."

"The open-source version offers 100% functionality and the hardware requirements for a solution like this one are very modest."

"Pandora FMS is easy to implement and the pricing of licenses is competitive."

"You have to pay for the number of agents and models that you are monitoring. I would rate the cost at three with one being the most expensive and five being the cheapest."

"They are very competitive on the pricing side. That's one reason why my manager keeps using it."

"The Open Source Community Edition is great to just explore the software, or use it on medium-sized infrastructures."

More Pandora FMS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

22%

Government

17%

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

University

Government

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 100% of the time

More Fortra's Intermapper Competitors

Zabbix vs Pandora FMS

Compared 20% of the time

Wazuh vs Pandora FMS

Compared 15% of the time

LibreNMS vs Pandora FMS

Compared 11% of the time

Checkmk vs Pandora FMS

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Pandora FMS

Compared 7% of the time

More Pandora FMS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

October 2025

Download Fortra's Intermapper product report

Buyer's Guide

Pandora FMS

September 2025

Download Pandora FMS product report

Also Known As

HelpSystems Intermapper

No data available

Overview

Fortra's software frees you up to focus on what matters most, aligning IT and business goals to help organizations build a competitive edge. Intermapper is network monitoring software for organizations who want to monitor their IT infrastructure in real time.

With Intermapper, you can visualize all your physical and virtual network components on a live map and get up-to-date performance data on its availability. Powerful and user-friendly, Intermapper helps leading businesses prevent costly outages and maximize uptime for 24/7 availability of network resources.

Features include flexible monitoring for anything with an IP address, free probes to monitor different types of equipment from various vendors, dynamic network mapping, bandwidth monitoring, real-time alerts, and remote access. Our add-on integration with Automate allows you to remediate network failures and conduct network self-healing.

Intermapper runs on Mac, Windows, and Linux.

Fortra

Pandora FMS is a monitoring as a service (MaaS) solution that is ideal for companies with at least 100 or more devices. Instead of multiple, difficult-to-integrate monitoring systems, Pandora FMS is an all-in-one solution that is easy to use. The software is able to untangle complicated technology infrastructures to easily identify the root cause of issues in order to find the most efficient solution. It does so by analyzing everything in your system, from databases and applications to services and desktops, as well as communications.

Pandora FMS Features

Pandora FMS has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Application Monitoring (APM)
IoT monitoring
Log collection
Inventory
Issue management / ITSM
Mainframe monitoring
Network monitoring
Remote control
Synthetic monitoring
Service oriented monitoring
Server monitoring
User experience monitoring
Virtualization & cloud

Pandora FMS Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Pandora FMS. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Comprehensive overview: Pandora FMS provides a comprehensive overview of your system to make troubleshooting easy. It also provides all the tools to monitor and analyze an extensive range of data, from traffic to connectivity.

Easy forecasting: With Pandora FMS, you can use your network diagram for forecasting solutions, which gives you the necessary info you need to perform maintenance.

Proactive solutions: Issues are proactively addressed. Pandora FMS provides alerts 24/7 so you can deal with problems before they grow even bigger. This also helps your organization eliminate any down time.

Solve future problems: Another benefit of implementing Pandora FMS is that it enables you to optimize your services to ensure that future issues are minimized. In addition, they offer around-the-clock monitoring and automated solutions. As a result, the solution enables you to operate your organization with maximum efficiency all the time, saving you money and time.

Personalized service maps: Pandora FMS allows you to create detailed, personalized service maps that can help you identify any shortcomings in your system and address them as soon as possible.

SLA and availability reports: With Pandora FMS, you receive critical alerts when SLA levels aren’t met, which also helps you understand when your applications and systems are not meeting your business goals.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Pandora FMS solution.

PeerSpot user Marc C., Systems Analyst at a university, says, "It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. It is really flexible. It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

Another reviewer, Alexandre J., comments, “What I value most about Pandora FMS is the simplicity of working with it. The speed of locating problems and to be able to solve them quickly, so that it affects our client's network infrastructure as little as possible, is very valuable.

Thanks to Pandora FMS we have everything unified in the same point and it is highly efficient.”

Pandora FMS

Sample Customers

Greater Media Detroit, University of British Columbia, Don's Farm Supply

Rakuten, Prosegur, Repsol, Teléfonica, Allianz, Ottawa Hospital, Hughes

Buyer's Guide

Fortra's Intermapper vs. Pandora FMS

September 2025

Free Report: Fortra's Intermapper vs. Pandora FMS

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra's Intermapper vs. Pandora FMS and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortra's Intermapper vs. Pandora FMS report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.