Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Forescout Platform vs McAfee NAC [EOL] vs Symantec Network Access Control [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Featured Reviews

Odai Halawani - PeerSpot reviewer
It's an easy and effective solution, especially for device profiling without agents
Forescout Platform's most valuable aspect is its excellent device profiling for devices without agents, which is crucial for our work due to challenges with agent-based devices. Its isolation and blocking actions are particularly effective for network security. The device compliance feature helps us ensure device compliance through immediate actions like updating antivirus software. We have already integrated Forescout with antivirus and vulnerability assessment tools, allowing it to monitor vulnerability scores and automatically isolate devices if critical vulnerabilities are detected.
Use McAfee NAC [EOL]?
Share your opinion
it_user297126 - PeerSpot reviewer
The DHCP enforcer works in tandem with Symantec Endpoint Protection's "host integrity" services for NAC, but while it works well in Windows, it doesn't work well for MacOS, iOS, and Android devices.
Symantec and their partner attempted to deploy Symantec Network Control Enforcer 6100 appliances and using 802.1X. At that time many of the devices on the network were not compatible with 802.1X and deployment was stopped. We moved to Symantec DHCP Enforcer software on our Domain controllers. The DHCP enforcer works in tandem with Symantec Endpoint Protection's "host integrity" services for NAC. Worked well for Windows clients - no so much for MacOS, iOS and Android devices. DHCP NAC enforcement has been deprecated. We have stopped NAC in our environment. We are relying on domain authentication and NPS for access to our production networks today. I'm now managing Apple products with CasperSuite MDM from JAMF Software
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.
855,347 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
22%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
8%
No data available
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Forescout Platform?
Forescout is a very powerful NAC product that does not rely on port level configuration. It can detect and block unau...
What advice do you have for others considering Forescout Platform?
I would rate the Forescout Device and Visibility Control Platform at a six out of ten.
What advice do you have for others considering Forescout Platform?
I recommend doing a compression demo. If people use it, they will buy it. So they have to see the product in place. T...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Forescout Platform, CounterACT for Endpoint Compliance, ForeScout CounterACT
Intel Security NAC
No data available
 

Overview

Information not available
 

Sample Customers

NHS Sussex, SAP, SEGA, Vistaprint, Miami Children's Hospital, Pioneer Investments, New York Law School, OmnicomGroup, Meritrust
State of Alaska
Englewood Hospital and Medical Center
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: May 2025.
855,347 professionals have used our research since 2012.