FME vs WhereScape RED comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Safe Software Logo
3,029 views|2,359 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
WhereScape Logo
2,654 views|1,753 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between FME and WhereScape RED based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Integration Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It has a very friendly user interface. You don't need to use a lot of code. For us that's the most important aspect about it. Also, it has a lot of connectors and few forms. It has a strong facial aspect. It can do a lot of facial analysis.""All spatial features are unrivaled, and the possibility to execute them based on a scheduled trigger, manual, e-mail, Websocket, tweet, file/directory change or virtually any trigger is most valuable.""The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface. There is nothing better. It is very easy to debug because you can see all steps where there are failures. Overall the software is easy to optimize a process.""It has standard plug-ins available for different data sources.""We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else."

More FME Pros →

"The tool supports multiple target update methods.""Their support staff are very knowledgeable, courteous, and professional. I feel their support staff go above and beyond to assure their customers are satisfied.""I found the initial setup very easy.""RED generates comprehensive documentation and regenerates it as quickly as things changes, but it also provides impact documentation.""WhereScape's deployment package is a fantastic feature. The application allows for selecting specific objects that you would like to deploy from one environment to another rather than deploying the entire database.""The most valuable feature is the metadata generated code.""WhereScape is really helpful in terms of architecture data. Everything is one of automation. Two people can do thousands of tables in one day or two. It saves a lot of time.""Quickly develops a data warehouse for our organization with documentation and can track back/forward features."

More WhereScape RED Pros →

Cons
"To get a higher rating, it would have to improve the price and the associated scalability. These are the main issues.""The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point.""FME can improve the geographical transformation. I've had some problems with the geographical transformations, but it's probably mostly because I'm not the most skilled geographer in-house. The solution requires some in-depth knowledge to perform some functions.""FME's price needs improvement for the African market.""Improvements could be made to mapping presentations."

More FME Cons →

"No support for change data capture or delta detection - that must be custom coded .""The solution can be a little more user-friendly on enterprise-level where people use it.""Improve the object renaming ability (it works, but it could be more automated).""Technical support isn't the best.""The scheduled jobs which are run by the WhereScape scheduler seem to be a strangely separate animal. Unlike all other WhereScape objects, jobs cannot be added to WhereScape projects. Also, unlike all other objects, jobs also cannot be deleted using a WhereScape deployment application.""Jobs cannot be deleted via the deployment package. When deploying from dev to QA or production, a job has to be retired. The job has to be manually removed from the target environment.""Project-based searching of data objects in the data warehouse browser needs to be improved.""They need a more robust support center. It has been a bit difficult to find solutions to problems that are out-of-the-box."

More WhereScape RED Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We used the standard licensing for our use of FME. The cost was approximately €15,000 annually. We always welcome less expensive solutions, if the solution could be less expensive it would be helpful."
  • "The product's price is reasonable."
  • "FME Server used to cost £10,000; now it can cost over £100,000."
  • More FME Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Factor in the price of specialized consulting who know this product. They're hard to find and expensive."
  • "ROI is at least 10 times."
  • "Speed to market of a warehouse solution at a relatively inexpensive price point."
  • "Our company purchased a corporate unlimited license."
  • More WhereScape RED Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.
    Top Answer:The pricing is really bad. Last year, they rebranded the whole pricing structure. It used to be moderately priced at about £400 per user per year. Now they've changed the whole thing, and it's… more »
    Top Answer:The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point. There must be a technical or… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    25th
    out of 100 in Data Integration
    Views
    3,029
    Comparisons
    2,359
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    605
    Rating
    8.3
    48th
    out of 100 in Data Integration
    Views
    2,654
    Comparisons
    1,753
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Azure Data Factory logo
    Compared 19% of the time.
    Alteryx Designer logo
    Compared 18% of the time.
    Talend Open Studio logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    SSIS logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Informatica PowerCenter logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Learn More
    WhereScape
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    FME is the data integration platform with the best support for spatial data. Run workflows on the desktop or deploy them in a server or cloud environment.

    WhereScape is data warehouse software that automates the Data Warehouse lifecycle. From implementation to maintenance, WhereScape will ensure your data warehouse projects are completed up to 5x faster than manual coding.

    Sample Customers
    Shell, US Department of Commerce, PG&E, BC Hydro, City of Vancouver, Enel, Iowa DoT, San Antonio Water System
    British American Tobacco, Cornell University, Allianz Benelux, Finnair, Solarwinds and many more.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government30%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    REVIEWERS
    Healthcare Company20%
    University20%
    Manufacturing Company20%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Government10%
    Insurance Company9%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise64%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise52%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Integration
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    FME is ranked 25th in Data Integration with 5 reviews while WhereScape RED is ranked 48th in Data Integration. FME is rated 8.6, while WhereScape RED is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of FME writes "Great for handling large volumes of data, but it is priced a bit high". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WhereScape RED writes "Quick to set up, flexible, and stable". FME is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Alteryx Designer, Talend Open Studio, SSIS and Informatica PowerCenter, whereas WhereScape RED is most compared with Azure Data Factory, SSIS, Informatica PowerCenter, Matillion ETL and Talend Open Studio.

    See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.