No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

FloQast vs Workiva Wdesk comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

FloQast
Ranking in Financial Close Software
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Workiva Wdesk
Ranking in Financial Close Software
9th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Business Performance Management (16th), GRC (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Financial Close Software category, the mindshare of FloQast is 3.5%, down from 5.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Workiva Wdesk is 5.6%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Financial Close Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
FloQast3.5%
Workiva Wdesk5.6%
Other90.9%
Financial Close Software
 

Featured Reviews

Jusitn Jusitn - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Accountant
Month-end close has become faster and team now focuses on higher-value reconciliation work
FloQast has positively impacted our organization by decreasing our month-end close time from 10 days to five days. The reduction in close time has affected my team and the organization overall by making things a lot more clear and streamlined. Our preparer can log in at the beginning of the day, see what is on their to-do list, what is high priority, and at the higher level, it allows us to focus on our value-add tasks and not focus so much on the rudimentary administrative month-end close task of compiling checklists and compiling support, as FloQast more or less automates all that for us.
TB
Senior Financial Analyst at Bakelite Synthetics
Allows multiple users, each responsible for specific sections, to collaborate efficiently
One area where Workiva Wdesk could improve is by ensuring that its cloud-based system is fully compatible with the most current versions of PowerPoint and Excel. Sometimes, the features available in their versions of these applications fell short of the company's standards, which could be limiting. Having access to the latest versions might increase costs, but it is essential to keep up with the evolving technology landscape and meet the demands of companies that require faster reporting processes. This would make it easier to handle custom requests and adjustments, like creating specific data categories in Excel and seamlessly transferring them into Wdesk for presentations without the need for time-consuming manual adjustments.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"FloQast has positively impacted our organization by decreasing our month-end close time from 10 days to five days."
"FloQast has positively impacted my organization by helping our month-end close be more streamlined, and at my previous company, it helped us go from a 15-day close to a 10-day close and then a 6-day close."
"It helps you to maintain a backup of your data, including the connectivity with the tables, which provides a user-friendly way to handle and access your files."
"It makes the compliance process more efficient and more effective."
"Workiva Wdesk is pretty good in terms of getting the data from the system, automating the reporting schedules...It has a very good integration with ERP tools."
"The collaboration within the platform is valuable."
"The most valuable feature is its ability to easily upload and update financial results, creating a dynamic data sheet."
"Workiva Wdesk has a flow diagram that is standardized, making it easy for people to file documents on ECDAs, which are in HTML format."
"The cross-functionality between connectivity, whether through API connections between different software platforms or the connection of data collection to the actual written ESG report, is highly valuable. The connectivity of all these aspects significantly aids in data assurance, which I consider a bonus."
 

Cons

"FloQast could be improved with more robust automations, meaning if a reviewer marks it reviewed in the support, that could be reflected in FloQast as well, and vice versa."
"The tool's script encoding needs to be updated to make it more user-friendly and less of a manual process when changes are made to a company's program. Those changes happen frequently due to mandatory or voluntary reporting requirements, leading to lost linkage connections that must be manually reset each time a change is made. This aspect is not functional now, and I see it as an opportunity for improvement."
"The speed must be improved."
"With this product, it's more about the integrated data model where you can have a one-to-many/many-to-one relationship between your policies and processes, risks, and controls. They need to showcase how you can put those pieces together."
"The most critical issue is the need to shift between uppercase and lowercase."
"At this point, I don't see a compelling reason to invest in Workiva. It may be necessary for compliance and controlling the version of SCC, but not everyone needs its high-end capabilities."
"One area where Workiva Wdesk could improve is by ensuring that its cloud-based system is fully compatible with the most current versions of PowerPoint and Excel."
"Regarding the solution, reporting has certain areas that can be considered for improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Our clients in Asia think that the solution is too expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Financial Close Software solutions are best for your needs.
913,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Construction Company
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Construction Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with FloQast?
I think FloQast could be improved, especially their flux module, by having a more powerful feature to allow teams to flux at a more granular level, such as a vendor level detail flux.
What is your primary use case for FloQast?
For our main use case with FloQast, we utilize it for month-end close tracking, reconciliation, and close management, as well as our fluxes. A specific example of how I use FloQast for month-end cl...
What advice do you have for others considering FloQast?
The advice I would give to others looking into using FloQast is that user adoption is key, ensuring every single accounting staff member and management are leveraging the tool because if not everyo...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Wdesk
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Camp Gladiator, Ruckus Wireless, Proctor U, Redbuilt, Talen Energy
Noodles Company, eBay, Winnebago, American Assets Trust, AmericanEnterprise, Calpian, Capstone Infrastructure, Cascades, Circor International, Coeur Mining, Davey, Dr Pepper Snapple
Find out what your peers are saying about Sage, Blackline, OneStream and others in Financial Close Software. Updated: August 2026.
913,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.