Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

FloQast vs Workiva Wdesk comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

FloQast
Ranking in Financial Close Software
12th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Workiva Wdesk
Ranking in Financial Close Software
7th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Business Performance Management (11th), GRC (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Financial Close Software category, the mindshare of FloQast is 4.4%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Workiva Wdesk is 6.1%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Financial Close Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Workiva Wdesk6.1%
FloQast4.4%
Other89.5%
Financial Close Software
 

Featured Reviews

Use FloQast?
Leave a review
reviewer2510292 - PeerSpot reviewer
Corporate ESG Analyst at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Has cross-functional connectivity but improvement is needed in script encoding
The tool's deployment is quick. Once the program is set up, you're ready to collect data and connect it to your report. The deployment team's size depends on the size of the company and how many different data providers you're utilizing. Some companies have one person doing everything, while others have a huge team. We're on the latter end of it, with many people involved. One great thing about the platform is that everything is consolidated in one place, providing a single resource for everyone. This is a benefit. The maintenance of the solution depends on the experience of the person managing the company's program. The company might have a contractor handling the back end and software management if they're low-level and only analyzing the data. However, if you have someone experienced with software and script encoding, that person might be the analyst and managing the program. Generally, most people are just analysts and not managing the software. There's an opportunity for improvement in user management of their software, and I hope they address this gap before the year ends.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Financial Close Software solutions are best for your needs.
879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Retailer
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Workiva Wdesk?
The tool's script encoding needs to be updated to make it more user-friendly and less of a manual process when changes are made to a company's program. Those changes happen frequently due to mandat...
What advice do you have for others considering Workiva Wdesk?
I've been working with the tool's script encoding departments and top management to address gaps in their script encoding. They are working towards closing these gaps to ensure we can continue usin...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Wdesk
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Camp Gladiator, Ruckus Wireless, Proctor U, Redbuilt, Talen Energy
Noodles Company, eBay, Winnebago, American Assets Trust, AmericanEnterprise, Calpian, Capstone Infrastructure, Cascades, Circor International, Coeur Mining, Davey, Dr Pepper Snapple
Find out what your peers are saying about Blackline, Sage, OneStream and others in Financial Close Software. Updated: December 2025.
879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.