No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

FloQast vs OneStream comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

FloQast
Ranking in Financial Close Software
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OneStream
Ranking in Financial Close Software
3rd
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Business Performance Management (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Financial Close Software category, the mindshare of FloQast is 3.5%, down from 5.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OneStream is 6.3%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Financial Close Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OneStream6.3%
FloQast3.5%
Other90.2%
Financial Close Software
 

Featured Reviews

Jusitn Jusitn - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Accountant
Month-end close has become faster and team now focuses on higher-value reconciliation work
FloQast has positively impacted our organization by decreasing our month-end close time from 10 days to five days. The reduction in close time has affected my team and the organization overall by making things a lot more clear and streamlined. Our preparer can log in at the beginning of the day, see what is on their to-do list, what is high priority, and at the higher level, it allows us to focus on our value-add tasks and not focus so much on the rudimentary administrative month-end close task of compiling checklists and compiling support, as FloQast more or less automates all that for us.
reviewer2759400 - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Financial & ESG Controlling at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Has supported global reporting needs and integrates well with internal systems
The features I find most valuable are the standard ones which we are required to use, as this is a group setup we use worldwide, so the reporting is quite standard. We have integrated OneStream XF with ERP and HCM systems. I mostly value their reporting features. OneStream XF's unified structure makes it easier for our financial consolidation and planning processes, though I would say we have a standardized way of using it and not that much forward-looking. They have helped enhance decision-making with analytics, but I think it's not that supportive. It depends on the use; it's okay for collecting information and setting it up, but for business support, we don't get much from it.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"FloQast has positively impacted my organization by helping our month-end close be more streamlined, and at my previous company, it helped us go from a 15-day close to a 10-day close and then a 6-day close."
"FloQast has positively impacted our organization by decreasing our month-end close time from 10 days to five days."
"The product's most valuable feature is extensibility."
"It offers great ease of use. This impacts not only the end-user experience but also the administrator's, which affects the total cost of ownership."
"We were with Oracle previously. With Oracle, you have to buy a different piece of software for every business process. If you want to do budgeting, that's a product. If you want to do consolidation, that's a product. If you want to do BI type of work, that's yet another product. So, you end up buying a lot of software from Oracle. With OneStream, it is a little different. It is a platform where you can do all those things, and you can do them with just one software purchase and then you just pay for users on it."
"OneStream XF's unified structure makes it easier for our financial consolidation and planning processes, though I would say we have a standardized way of using it and not that much forward-looking."
"OneStream XF is advantageous because it provides one product that can do everything; users do not have to purchase separate products for consolidation, planning, and reporting, which saves time and money in training and setup."
 

Cons

"FloQast could be improved with more robust automations, meaning if a reviewer marks it reviewed in the support, that could be reflected in FloQast as well, and vice versa."
"There are longstanding challenges with OneStream XF, particularly around the technical aspects that require scripting skills, typically managed by finance departments."
"We should be able to download the data in the same format we upload it."
"Currently, they only support one browser, and it would be good if you could use it on Chrome, Firefox, etc. It is a little frustrating that you can only use a certain Microsoft browser. They're pretty tightly aligned with Microsoft. So, I can see the reasons for it."
"AI is where I see the most innovation and progress, but it's not fully developed yet."
"It's okay for collecting information and setting it up, but for business support, we don't get much from it."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"They price it by the user. Before discounting, it is 2,500 or something like that."
"The product has a license by the user. They're on par with other competitors."
"The licensing is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Financial Close Software solutions are best for your needs.
913,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Construction Company
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with FloQast?
I think FloQast could be improved, especially their flux module, by having a more powerful feature to allow teams to flux at a more granular level, such as a vendor level detail flux.
What is your primary use case for FloQast?
For our main use case with FloQast, we utilize it for month-end close tracking, reconciliation, and close management, as well as our fluxes. A specific example of how I use FloQast for month-end cl...
What advice do you have for others considering FloQast?
The advice I would give to others looking into using FloQast is that user adoption is key, ensuring every single accounting staff member and management are leveraging the tool because if not everyo...
Seeking lightweight open source BI software
I advise you to try OneStream. This is a very good platform focused on reporting, consolidation and budgeting & forecasting.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OneStream XF?
My experience with the price has been okay. It's something that, when part of a larger system, we need to use, and there are also some discounts related to our multi-country usage.
What needs improvement with OneStream XF?
I would like to see additional features in the future to make it closer to perfect, such as easier implementation of additional subsystems for forecasting, budgeting, planning analysis, and so fort...
 

Comparisons

 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Camp Gladiator, Ruckus Wireless, Proctor U, Redbuilt, Talen Energy
Fruit of the Loom, Melrose, AAA, Valeo Foods
Find out what your peers are saying about Sage, Blackline, OneStream and others in Financial Close Software. Updated: August 2026.
913,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.