Fivetran vs SAS Data Integration Server comparison

Fivetran and SAS are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Fivetran is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.9, while SAS is ranked #37 with an average rating of 7.5. Fivetran holds a 2.3% mindshare in DI, compared to SAS’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of SAS users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 27 Fivetran reviews

4,197 Views
2,518 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

SAS Data Integration Server

Read 4 SAS Data Integration Server reviews

773 Views
564 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Fivetran

SAS Data Integration Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SAS Data Integration Server and Fivetran are competing products in the data integration landscape. Despite SAS's robust features, Fivetran's ease of use and automation provide an edge, making it a strong contender worth its pricing.

Features: SAS Data Integration Server offers advanced data transformation capabilities, strong governance features, and is ideal for complex data workflows. Fivetran is noted for its automated data connectors, seamless integration, and efficient management of data pipelines with minimal maintenance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS Data Integration Server requires an intensive deployment process but provides comprehensive customer support for its sophisticated system. Fivetran offers a swift deployment experience with a guided setup and has responsive customer service that reduces friction in getting started. Fivetran's simpler deployment model allows quick integration and management with less overhead.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Data Integration Server involves higher initial setup costs due to its complexity but offers a high ROI through its extensive capabilities once implemented. Fivetran has accessible pricing focused on cost-effective scaling and quick returns due to its streamlined setup and reduced maintenance. While SAS provides depth and control, Fivetran's model offers immediate ROI potential through rapid deployment and ease of scaling.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. SAS Data Integration Server Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. SAS Data Integration Server

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Data Integration

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (3rd), Cloud Data Integration (7th)

SAS Data Integration Server

Ranking in Data Integration

37th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 2.3%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Data Integration Server is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Mediha Šiljić

Lead Data Engineer at Sensilab

Built-in connectors offer extensive data source integration and time savings

Fivetran could improve by adapting more for technical users and by providing more options for such users. There should be more adaptability in terms of new features. If a specific feature is required, it should be integrated promptly. Improvement in existing connectors with new features is desirable. Enhancements around customer-focused product adaptation are also suggested.

Read full review

reviewer2937544

Works at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Offloads processes on the server side but needs better installation syntax

One area for improvement is the installation process. Another point could be the syntax, as it sometimes involves using syntax names that are not intuitive. For example, to calculate the difference between two dates, the general syntax in SAS is called the data difference or data net function. However, another name is used, such as NF and INK. Without knowledge of SAS programming, it becomes unclear what these functions mean. It is not good to define function names this way.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"SysTrack load is the best feature."

"Fivetran can perform data migration incredibly fast, depending on the source and target."

"It is not like a traditional ETL, but it gives quite a lot of flexibility."

"You can manage all of your connectors individually, which gives you a very good ability to trace which one of your ETL processes is running and when."

"Fivetran offers native connectivity with Sybase"

"The compare feature is the most valuable piece of it."

"It is easy for users to get accustomed to the tool due to its gentle learning curve and clear error transparency."

"The general data ingestion is valuable. It's used for a lot of data. It provides about 90% of the data we use in our data warehouse without needing data engineering."

More Fivetran pros

"A key feature allows us to enhance job performance by offloading processing to the server side, rather than processing on the server itself."

"The solution offers very good data manipulation and loading."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its amazing capabilities in regard to data handling."

"The solution is very stable."

Cons

"More connectors are needed for exotic, popular, and rising star portals."

"There was a random change to our contract in a unilateral manner after the first year. The overall cost of using Fivetran was then unclear and this is the reason I would not recommend this solution."

"Their pricing has increased over the years, so it's not seen as an advantage anymore."

"The environment must be more development-friendly."

"An in-line data quality checking capability is missing"

"Some of the pain points we're looking at are trying to integrate some of the items in the Microsoft stack, so SharePoint and Excel, and then some of the newer Azure services."

"The customization could improve because Fivetran gives more thought to people who don't want to manage analytics workflows rather than engineers who want to be able to customize pipelines more thoroughly."

"We experience cost issues because Fivetran is charged on a usage basis. When you reach a certain level, the tool should focus on reducing the costs. The solution is expensive when you are moving gigabytes and petabytes of data. It should also focus more on REST APIs and webhooks."

More Fivetran cons

"One area for improvement is the installation process."

"So I would like to see improved integration with other software."

"The initial setup of SAS Data Integration Server was complex."

"The transform tool has limited access. They should make it more flexible."

"The initial setup had issues, and even after using it for about one year, it was still not fixed."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high."

"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."

"The product is reasonably expensive"

"The solution is affordable."

"When you have a lot of workflows and complex use cases, pricing goes down as you use it more."

"I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."

"I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."

"Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"It is an expensive program."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

Government

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAS Data Integration Server?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its amazing capabilities in regard to data handling.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAS Data Integration Server?

I don't handle the cost and budget part. From the tool's perspective, I can say that it is an amazing product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAS Data Integration Server?

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 11% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Fivetran

Compared 7% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

AWS Glue vs Fivetran

Compared 4% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

SSIS vs SAS Data Integration Server

Compared 33% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs SAS Data Integration Server

Compared 22% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs SAS Data Integration Server

Compared 17% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs SAS Data Integration Server

Compared 15% of the time

AWS Glue vs SAS Data Integration Server

Compared 13% of the time

More SAS Data Integration Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

August 2025

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

August 2025

Download SAS Data Integration Server product report

Also Known As

No data available

SAS Enterprise Data Integration Server, Enterprise Data Integration Server

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

SAS Data Integration Server is a powerful, configurable and comprehensive solution that can meet a wide variety of data integration requirements, from small tactical projects to strategic business initiatives. It can access virtually all data sources, support data warehousing, migration, synchronization, federation and provisioning initiatives. It can support both batch-oriented and real-time master data management solutions. It can create reusable data integration services in support of service-oriented architectures and data governance and extract, cleanse, transform, conform, aggregate, load and manage data.

SAS

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

Credit Guarantee Corporation, Cr_dito y Cauci‹n, Delaware State Police, Deutsche Lufthansa, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, DSM, Livzon Pharmaceutical Group, Los Angeles County, Miami Herald Media Company, Netherlands Enterprise Agency, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Nippon Paper, West Midlands Police, XS Inc., Zenith Insurance

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. SAS Data Integration Server

August 2025

Free Report: Fivetran vs. SAS Data Integration Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. SAS Data Integration Server and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. SAS Data Integration Server report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.