NetApp SnapMirror and Fivetran both operate in the data replication and integration sector, offering unique features and capabilities for enterprise solutions. NetApp SnapMirror has the upper hand in enterprise-level disaster recovery and real-time replication efficiency, while Fivetran is preferred for its simplicity and effective ETL pipeline management.
Features: NetApp SnapMirror offers block-based replication, integration into VMware for disaster recovery, and minimal bandwidth usage. Its management through CLI or Oncommand manager and data integrity preservation are highly valued. Fivetran provides managed pipelines, integration with DBT for data transformation, and scalability. Users appreciate its ease of setup for data migration and detailed logging which facilitates efficient data syncing.
Room for Improvement: NetApp SnapMirror could enhance data replication speed, efficiency, and simplify its GUI. Users find synchronization for large datasets and complex licensing requirements challenging. Fivetran could benefit from having more exotic data connectors, improved data observability, and a flexible pricing model. Enhanced customization and better integration support for on-prem systems are also desired.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetApp SnapMirror is commended for robust support and easy implementation in on-premises and hybrid cloud environments, with responsive tech support. Fivetran shows minimal deployment hurdles for public cloud setups but faces critique for limited support and needing broader connector options.
Pricing and ROI: NetApp SnapMirror is perceived as having high pricing, often requiring additional licenses despite some viewing bundled pricing as reasonable. It offers a clear ROI through enhanced data backup and availability. Fivetran's database-driven model is seen as expensive, yet scalable and cost-efficient with increased usage. Its scaling model benefits larger enterprises with complex workflows; however, cost issues persist for smaller setups.
It saves us the effort of having one to two data engineers managing the tasks that Fivetran handles.
The technical support provided by Fivetran has generally been good, with a response time and competence that I would rate as good.
NetApp SnapMirror is very scalable, as all we need is an ONTAP cluster, starting from two nodes up to 24 nodes with NAS or 12 nodes in a SAN in an iSCSI environment.
During the duration of the time that we used Fivetran, it was highly stable.
From a cost perspective, if the number of connectors is lesser, then Fivetran is not the most cost-efficient option.
Fivetran could improve by adapting more for technical users and by providing more options for such users.
Our current yearly contract for Fivetran is approximately $70,000.
The most valuable feature of Fivetran is its built-in connectors for a wide range of data sources.
The ability to seamlessly integrate with a large variety of data sources is valuable.
Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
