FileAudit vs Grafana Loki comparison

IS Decisions and Grafana Labs are both solutions in the Log Management category. IS Decisions is ranked #40 with an average rating of 8.0, while Grafana Labs is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. IS Decisions holds a 0.1% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Grafana Labs’s 8.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IS Decisions users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Grafana Labs users who would recommend it.

FileAudit

Read 3 FileAudit reviews

285 Views
144 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Grafana Loki

Read 18 Grafana Loki reviews

9,511 Views
5,299 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

FileAudit

Grafana Loki

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

FileAudit and Grafana Loki compete in enterprise data monitoring and security. FileAudit is perceived more favorably in pricing and customer support, while Grafana Loki is preferred for its scalability and integration features.

Features: FileAudit stands out for its ease of use, strong file monitoring capabilities, and role in enhancing security governance. Grafana Loki is known for exceptional scalability, extensive integration in cloud environments, and efficient log management, making it suitable for large organizations with advanced data analytics needs.

Room for Improvement: FileAudit users suggest improvements in reporting capabilities, additional integration options with third-party applications, and a wider range of customizable alerts. Grafana Loki users identify the need for better documentation, simplification of its configuration process, and improved user interface navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FileAudit is praised for its straightforward installation process and responsive customer service, which efficiently handles issues. Grafana Loki has a more complex deployment due to its customizability but benefits from strong community-backed support resources, which assist in resolving deployment challenges.

Pricing and ROI: FileAudit offers competitive setup costs and favorable ROI, aligning with its cost-effective pricing model. Grafana Loki requires a higher initial investment but delivers significant value through its extensive feature set, providing strategic business benefits over time despite the higher upfront costs.

To learn more, read our detailed FileAudit vs. Grafana Loki Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FileAudit vs. Grafana Loki

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FileAudit

Ranking in Log Management

40th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (43rd)

Grafana Loki

Ranking in Log Management

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of FileAudit is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Grafana Loki is 8.7%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

AntoSebastin

Cyber Security Consultant - APAC at Logon Software

A scalable SIEM solution for monitoring a user's activity in the file server

The most valuable features of the solution are its quick and simple features related to advanced permissions for files, allowing for what permission needs to be granted to the users when it comes to the monitoring folder in the solution. If someone who has been denied permission to use a particular folder tries to go to that folder, then the administrator gets a notification. In general, the administrator can easily gather and maintain records if a person who has been denied permission to a particular confidential folder tries to access it.

Read full review

Volodymyr Bondarchuk

Senior System Engineer at Novell

Integrations enhance monitoring but problem-solving proves challenging

Different types of integrations with various sources are the most helpful and useful features of Grafana Loki that I found for myself. As part of Kubernetes technology, I noticed benefits from using this product such as availability, configuration balancing, high availability solutions for high performance, and failover clustering. It provides a clear picture about the state of the system and gives needed information for taking action and quickly fixing problems.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a good and stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"Alerting upon file changes is the most valuable aspect of the product."

"Our customer acquires the complete report which is kept for future auditing purposes."

"Loki significantly saves time in troubleshooting by quickly pinpointing network issues."

"The log collection feature is good and the solution is easily understandable. v"

"Grafana agent is very lightweight and does not cost significant resources of our cluster."

"Grafana Loki is easy to monitor and detect errors."

"There are new features like that pilot code and things like that for profiling."

"The tool can be used in multi-cluster environments."

"I appreciate the capability to process logs from microservices and seamlessly integrate them into Grafana."

"The most valuable feature of Grafana Loki is the dashboards which are really simple to create."

More Grafana Loki pros

Cons

"The DLP function, including installation of the agent on the workstation and controlling the DLP restrictions, are areas where the product lacks."

"The updates management and central management console could be improved."

"Whenever someone cuts and paste, it shows as "file is deleted"."

"I do not see any areas for improvement at the moment."

"We encountered certain limitations when it came to alerting, particularly when dealing with specific data sources."

"We face some bugs when we install the latest version of Grafana Loki."

"The solution has shortcomings regarding security monitoring-oriented features that need improvement."

"The product must improve its UI."

"Visualization-wise, Grafana Loki's dashboard looks a little outdated compared to other open-source visualization tools like Chronograf."

"The solution's scalability depends on the team managing the Grafana instance."

"There is a need for some change in the alerting types of the product. In short, a few changes in the alert area are needed due to minor shortcomings."

More Grafana Loki cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"FileAudit provides a trial license for 30 days, and after that, customers can choose between perpetual licensing or the annual-based licensing option offered by FileAudit."

"The cost is less than other paid services like CloudWatch."

"I use the solution's open-source version. Grafana Loki is a completely free solution for me."

"Since we are using the open-source version of Grafana Loki, we are not paying anything for the solution."

"We use a free version."

"Grafana Loki is an open-source solution."

"I use the open-source version of the product."

"I find the licensing structure quite reasonable, as the free license effectively meets my requirements."

"Grafana Loki is a free, open-source solution."

More Grafana Loki pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FileAudit?

It is a good and stable solution...It is a scalable solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FileAudit?

The DLP function, including installation of the agent on the workstation and controlling the DLP restrictions, are areas where the product lacks. It would be great if the aforementioned details wer...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for FileAudit?

My company uses FileAudit as an SIEM solution, and it is used for monitoring the file server activity to find out what users did in the file server, which may include modifying the file, deleting i...

See all answers

What do you like most about Grafana Loki?

We are using Grafana Loki as a database for real-time metrics.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Grafana Loki?

Since it is an open source tool, there are no charges or fees.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Grafana Loki?

I have no ideas at this moment about what could be improved in Grafana Loki.

See all answers

Comparisons

ManageEngine File Audit Plus vs FileAudit

Compared 100% of the time

More FileAudit Competitors

Graylog vs Grafana Loki

Compared 28% of the time

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Grafana Loki

Compared 12% of the time

Wazuh vs Grafana Loki

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs Grafana Loki

Compared 8% of the time

Seq vs Grafana Loki

Compared 6% of the time

More Grafana Loki Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

June 2025

Download FileAudit product report

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Loki

June 2025

Download Grafana Loki product report

Overview

Agentless, remote and non-intrusive, FileAudit offers a simple more user-friendly way to safeguard and secure file access in a Windows environment. FileAudit provides real-time monitoring and alerting on all access (or access attempts). FileAudit also implements contextual functions such as mass access and alteration alerts, tracking source IP address information for remote data access, and providing granular time and date alerting parameters to monitor folder and file access at unusual or unexpected times.

IS Decisions

Grafana Loki is a powerful log aggregation and analysis tool designed for cloud-native environments. Its primary use case is to collect, store, and search logs efficiently, enabling organizations to gain valuable insights from their log data.

The most valuable functionality of Loki is its ability to scale horizontally, making it suitable for high-volume log data. It achieves this by utilizing a unique indexing approach called "Promtail," which efficiently indexes logs and allows for fast searching and filtering. Loki also supports log streaming in real-time, ensuring that organizations can monitor and analyze logs as they are generated.

By centralizing logs in a single location, Loki simplifies log management and troubleshooting processes. It provides a unified view of logs from various sources, making it easier to identify and resolve issues quickly. With its powerful query language, organizations can extract meaningful information from logs, enabling them to gain insights into system performance, identify anomalies, and detect potential security threats.

Loki's integration with Grafana, a popular open-source visualization tool, allows users to create rich dashboards and visualizations based on log data. This combination enhances the observability of systems and applications, enabling organizations to make data-driven decisions and improve overall operational efficiency.

Grafana Labs

Sample Customers

CommuniCare Health Centre, DP World, BAE Systems, Moet Hennessy, Ernst & Young, Honda, Volswagon, VTech, GlakoSmithKline, Lockheed Martin, US Navy, University of Alabama, Ministry of Interior Saudi Arabia, Total

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

FileAudit vs. Grafana Loki

June 2025

Free Report: FileAudit vs. Grafana Loki

Find out what your peers are saying about FileAudit vs. Grafana Loki and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FileAudit vs. Grafana Loki report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.