Fidelis Elevate vs SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL] comparison

Fidelis Security and SentinelOne are both solutions in the Threat Deception Platforms category. Fidelis Security is ranked #10, while SentinelOne is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.0. Additionally, 100% of Fidelis Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SentinelOne users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 31, 2026

Fidelis Elevate and SentinelOne Singularity Hologram compete in cybersecurity. Fidelis holds an advantage in support and pricing, while SentinelOne offers greater value with advanced features.

Features: Fidelis Elevate provides robust endpoint security, effective threat detection, and comprehensive incident response. SentinelOne's AI-powered threat detection, autonomous responses, and proactive security measures make it highly adaptable.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fidelis Elevate ensures easy deployment with responsive support. SentinelOne involves a more complex setup but benefits from detailed onboarding and exceptional support services.

Pricing and ROI: Fidelis Elevate offers competitive pricing with clear setup costs, ensuring good ROI. SentinelOne's higher initial cost is justified by substantial long-term ROI from its advanced features and threat impact reduction.

To learn more, read our detailed Threat Deception Platforms Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Threat Deception Platforms

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,789 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Mostafa Ameen

Information Security Engineer at ICT Misr

Advanced threat detection capabilities with comprehensive incident response features providing robust cybersecurity for organizations

The initial aspect concerns two engines. The first one mentioned is available for searching behaviors directly. The second engine involves the Google Ade tool, which operates on the machine. The challenge arises when attempting to rectify protection rules, causing confusion. It would be beneficial to enhance Rigixs Query. I encounter difficulty removing certain entries in behavior or alerts; likewise, I am unable to add specific calls.

Read full review

Graham Peck

Data Security Manager at Leeds United FC

Lockdown devices and ports on endpoints so that you can stop propagation of any virus if it's detected but performance utilization can be better

It's scalable in the form of it now covers mobile devices as well as a number of other different types of devices, not just Windows. Also, there's no limit as to how many devices you can install it on. We plan to expand the number of devices/users as we get more people onboard or upgrade to more mobile devices; we will then increase the number of licenses for mobile devices. We've got 450 licenses, but we've got about 375 devices and users currently. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. There's not a product yet that I've found that I can't put it on, especially now that they've got the new release, which was the mobile agents.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has a higher cost than other solutions, like CrowdStrike or Microsoft’s EDR tools, but it reduces the cost of our operations because it’s a new generation antivirus tool."

"Stability is a primary factor, and then there's the ease of distribution and policy management."

"The level of security I get for my endpoints and servers is extremely valuable."

"Cortex XDR features advanced threat detection capabilities."

"Its ability to react to cyber data attacks is awesome."

"From a single pane of glass, you can easily manage all of your endpoints."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to rapidly detect certain hardware files."

"The most valuable aspect of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks for me is its integration with AI detection, where we get to know the behavioral detection based on users, traffic patterns, and different services that we consume."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"Reporting is great, it is easy to do a quick search through 45 days of data for something of interest."

"It has also improved our hunt ability with quick search tools, to zone in on malware or other anomalies. It is able to link items to incidents from other consoles, and works natively with the SIEM."

"There are many valuable features. The NDR gives very good network visibility, and the endpoint module has a great feature called "Live Connect" for remote connections. They also have "Tasks" that can be run on endpoints to gather specific information or retrieve logs."

"The initial setup is very straightforward. The deployment of the server doesn't take so long; about a day or two max."

"What I like the most about this solution is the complexity; it covers a lot of areas, unlike other solutions."

"After rack and stack, devices were up and running base configurations within two hours. As with any IPS, tuning is required to stop false positives. This is no different, but the ease of use of the interface allowed my team to start making adjustments within a few hours."

"What I like the most about this solution is the complexity. It covers a lot of areas, unlike other solutions."

"It has a rating system now so you can rate things up or down, depending on your environment. This means alerting can be customized, yet still pick up anomalies."

More Fidelis Elevate pros

"The automated response capability in SentinelOne enhances security operations. It means I don't have to worry about having too many security people watching it because you can automate a lot of the tasks."

Cons

"Cortex XDR is trickier to configure than other Palo Alto products. This is one area where we are not so satisfied."

"Previously, the endpoint would leave the environment, not being on our VPN, essentially unable to interact with the server to upload files."

"The deployment is pretty hard."

"The server sometimes stops continuously to check things so it would be helpful to receive access updates or technical reasons."

"The tool needs to be improved in terms of integration and interface."

"Technology evolves every day, so it would be nice if it gets more secure. It can also have more integration with other platforms."

"The installation should be easier and the Palo Alto pre-sales and sales teams should have more information on the product because they don't know what they are selling."

"The downsides of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks are that in many incidents, when I enter the causality chain, there are numerous logs."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"I encounter difficulty removing certain entries in behavior or alerts; likewise, I am unable to add specific calls."

"The interface bug needs to be squashed once and for all."

"The reports in the endpoint area of Elevate can be improved."

"We position the solution as an antivirus, but this part of the solution needs improvement. They need to generally enhance the features that they have, rather than adding anything new."

"The interface bug needs to be squashed once and for all. This has been the predominant issue with an otherwise stellar product. It reboots itself unscheduled, about once a month, due to a memory buffer flaw in the interface."

"There is room for improvement in email security. It's a security issue. If you're aiming for XDR, covering the entire threat landscape is crucial."

"Configuration, in terms of building the collector and communicating with endpoints, is complex."

More Fidelis Elevate cons

"The performance utilization on the device that it's monitoring. This aspect needs improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is present, but when compared to other competitive products, I would say it is not less expensive; however, when all of the other added values are considered, the price is reasonable."

"It's the most expensive solution, but features-wise, it's quite strong. It's very good for protection, so the results are very good in the case of protection. I would rate it a two out of ten in terms of pricing."

"It's way too expensive, but security is expensive. You pay for your licensing, and then you pay for someone to monitor the stuff."

"The price of the product is not very economical."

"The price of the solution could be reduced. I have customers that have voiced that the solution is good for the value but if I want to sell more of the solution the price reduction would help."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is an expensive solution."

"We pay about $50,000 USD per year for a bundle that includes Cortex XDR."

"In terms of the cost Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very expensive because we are a Mexican company and when you translate dollars to pesos the cost is very high. The solution is very expensive for Mexican companies. I understand that they have international prices, but I do not think it offsets the price enough for many companies in countries, such as Mexico. The amount it is reduced is not a massive percentage."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"It's quite expensive but we can customize it to reduce the price."

"Fidelis Endpoint is an expensive product. My company makes yearly payments toward the licensing cost of the solution."

"You license by the number of days of logs you need to maintain visibility for. Forty-five days is a good solid number for a company with around a 10k user base."

"It's somehow expensive. From one to ten, I would rate it a five. They need to improve the prices. It's very high."

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten; one is very expensive, and ten is an absolutely cheap product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Deception Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

15%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	48

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SentinelOne Singularity Hologram?

It's obviously increased my cost when it comes to security management because I didn't have it before, and it isn't t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SentinelOne Singularity Hologram?

The performance utilization on the device that it's monitoring. This aspect needs improvement.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SentinelOne Singularity Hologram?

Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. I won't give it a ten. I've seen some others that I may next t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 8% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 6% of the time

SentinelOne Wayfinder Managed Detection & Response vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 4% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Cloud vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 4% of the time

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 2% of the time

More Fidelis Elevate Competitors

SentinelOne Singularity Identity vs SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Acalvio vs SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Proofpoint Identity Threat Defense vs SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

More SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

April 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Fidelis Elevate

April 2026

Download Fidelis Elevate product report

Buyer's Guide

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

April 2026

SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL] report

Download SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Fidelis Elevate Platform, Fidelis Enterprise, Fidelis Cloud, Fidelis Managed Detection and Response, Fidelis Deception, Fidelis Decryption, Fidelis Endpoint, Fidelis Network

Attivo Networks

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Fidelis Elevate integrates network visibility, data loss prevention, deception, and endpoint detection and response into one unified solution. Now your security team can focus on the most urgent threats and protect sensitive data rather than spending time validating and triaging thousands of alerts.

Fidelis Security

SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL] is an advanced endpoint protection solution that harnesses machine learning for proactive threat detection to secure enterprise environments effectively.

SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL] integrates AI-driven security technologies to provide comprehensive defense mechanisms against evolving cyber threats. Focusing on real-time threat detection, it utilizes behavioral analytics to anticipate and neutralize threats before they materialize. Its ease of integration into existing systems and its proactive approach to security make it a strong choice for organizations seeking to enhance their cybersecurity posture.

What are the main features?

AI-Driven Detection: Uses advanced machine learning algorithms to identify and stop threats in real-time.
Behavioral Analytics: Monitors endpoint behavior to quickly spot anomalies and mitigate risks.
Scalability: Easily scalable to accommodate growing organizational demands without compromising performance.
Cloud-Native Architecture: Leverages cloud capabilities for seamless updates and reduced overhead.

What benefits should users consider?

Improved Security Posture: Strengthens overall cybersecurity defenses against sophisticated attacks.
Cost Efficiency: Lowers operational costs with automated threat detection and response.
Reduced Downtime: Minimizes potential business disruptions through swift threat neutralization.
Enhanced Integration: Compatible with diverse IT environments for smooth implementation.

Enterprises in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications have successfully adopted SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL] to shield critical operations. Its integration into existing IT infrastructure provides enhanced security while maintaining operational efficiency across the board.

SentinelOne

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

First Midwest Bank

NSS Labs., Fierce IT security, FireEye

Buyer's Guide

Threat Deception Platforms

April 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Commvault, Cynet, SentinelOne and others in Threat Deception Platforms. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Threat Deception Platforms vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Threat Deception Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.