F5 Advanced WAF vs Uplynk comparison

Read 7 Uplynk reviews

5,411 Views
2,164 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

F5 Advanced WAF

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Uplynk and F5 Advanced WAF are competing in digital security and media streaming. Uplynk is more user-friendly in pricing and support, while F5 Advanced WAF offers comprehensive security features justifying its higher cost.

Features: Uplynk provides robust media streaming, high-quality video delivery, and dynamic ad insertion. F5 Advanced WAF offers advanced threat protection, bot management, and DDoS mitigation, ideal for security-focused environments.

Room for Improvement: Uplynk could improve by offering more advanced security features, enhancing user interface customization, and providing more flexible pricing options. F5 Advanced WAF could benefit from easing deployment complexity, improving cost transparency, and refining its integration process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Uplynk offers a simple deployment and reliable customer service, ensuring a smooth user experience. F5 Advanced WAF, though complex to deploy, provides detailed configuration and strong guidance for security consultation during setup.

Pricing and ROI: Uplynk's lower setup cost offers quick ROI for media-focused applications. F5 Advanced WAF's higher initial costs are offset by its enhanced security features, providing significant long-term ROI, particularly for organizations with critical security needs.

To learn more, read our detailed F5 Advanced WAF vs. Uplynk Report (Updated: September 2026).

F5 Advanced WAF vs. Uplynk

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

F5 Advanced WAF

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Uplynk

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

28th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (6th), CDN (8th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of F5 Advanced WAF is 3.4%, down from 7.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Uplynk is 1.5%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
F5 Advanced WAF	3.4%
Uplynk	1.5%
Other	95.1%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2797602

Senior Security Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Granular security policies have protected critical applications and ensure safe user and admin access

Improvements could be made regarding the log information from the backend CLI. There are enhancements needed; if a request gets blocked on the TCP layer, there should be traces or data to verify which source generated these requests, including the source and port information for initiation. These data are missing from F5 Advanced WAF. Besides that, another improvement could be refining the bot detection to minimize false positives; it should be able to verify more granularly between legitimate and non-legitimate clients. Overall, I find everything else good. A wish list feature I have is for the Technical Assistance Center (TAC) to respond more promptly. Their response time needs improvement; while they do not take excessive time, it can be enhanced, especially given it is a security product.

Read full review

AliKhalil

manager at a non-profit with 501-1,000 employees

Reliable live streaming has increased our continuous viewership and maintained audience trust

Uplynk is deployed in my organization on-premises and is fully on-site. Uplynk supports our business continuity or disaster recovery plans because it's really well protected and it doesn't lag or crash when there's a spike in all areas. Uplynk helps us comply with regulatory requirements in our industry by keeping us live. Uplynk integrates really well with other systems or tools we use. You need a whole team to really run Uplynk because there are so many moving pieces, the code, the app, and other components. My experience with Uplynk's analytics or reporting capabilities is that they are especially helpful to update the teams and our stakeholders. I would describe Uplynk's flexibility or customization options as really easy, really customizable, and it integrates in many areas. Uplynk helps me deliver content to different devices or platforms by allowing us to upload on and stay live on tablets, computers, and televisions. It allows us to stay live to get those viewerships. Uplynk is a software that saves time, but you need a solid team to run Uplynk to ensure viewership and everything is moving because there are many pieces to keep. I advise others looking into using Uplynk that it takes many different areas: coding, integration, APIs, and all that. It takes a team to run it, and you need to be a big company. If you're streaming and doing all that at a big scale, use it. If you're on a smaller scale, Uplynk is going to be really hard for you to manage. It's not something that's simple; just use the ones that are basic out there if you're an influencer and things like that. I would rate this product a nine overall.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What a WAF is happens to be exactly what we are using F5 WAF for: a firewall for our web applications."

"Good dashboard and reporting."

"The solution is easily accessible on mobile and laptop devices."

"The bot defense capability, as well as protection from brute force attacks and OWASP Top Ten, are notable features."

"I like the security features, especially against SQL injection."

"F5 Advanced WAF secures our connectivity and combines both the main functions of WAF (balancing and web application security)."

"The solution isn't too expensive. The license allows you to license what you need and leave out what you don't need."

"When you choose to go with F5, be sure to size your box properly so that the capacity is taken care of."

More F5 Advanced WAF pros

"It's super easy to use and integrate with."

"Without EdgeCast, our website was taking 10 to 15 seconds to load; with EdgeCast, it loads under five seconds and it's a good product."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the Uplynk platform for streaming purposes."

"The customer support and service responsiveness were excellent."

"I recommend this solution because, for me, it's one of the most efficient and performant CDN operators."

"Uplynk has positively impacted our organization by bringing us more viewership, as it does not glitch and stays stable during spikes in viewership, leading to approximately a 15 to 20 percent increase in viewership because there's no lag and nothing fails."

"The product is easy to use and easy to implement."

"The Rules Engine V4 is the most valuable feature."

Cons

"We usually use a third-party tool for logging and reporting. It would be nice if we could do that right on this solution. They have one, but it's not very stable. Logging and reporting effectively would be a big enhancement."

"F5 needs to improve API protection with a single F5 solution, without requiring additional modules."

"F5 Advanced needs to improve its bot protection. The solution needs to have machine learning to learn the behavior of the customer to recognize the human versus the bot. This is a difficult feature to explain to our customers. I would like documentation about the bot feature to make it easier for the customer to understand."

"One area for improvement in the product is its SSO integration, which posed challenges and required significant effort to resolve."

"My advice to future customers of F5 Advanced WAF or to people thinking of using it is that there is a much better product in the market."

"The product could be more user-friendly, particularly the user interface for administrators."

"F5 Advanced WAF could improve on its funding for WAF features. There is a need to be more advanced WAF features."

"I would like to see the API Protection improved."

More F5 Advanced WAF cons

"To improve Uplynk, it should be made more user-friendly, as it takes a lot of moving pieces to make it work."

"In the next release, I would like to see more global endpoints for their CDN and a lower price."

"The comparable features that we are looking at fits into Cloudflare's free version, as opposed to Verizon EdgeCast, which we are paying for."

"The web interface of the Verizon Edgecast portal is very old. It's not user-friendly, slow, and it is missing some valuable features like the ability to make bulk changes."

"We could not create more than 15 custom rules."

"The tool needs to resolve its lack of innovation."

"The pricing was initially very expensive."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is reasonable when compared with other products, such as FortiWeb. I am very satisfied with the price."

"There are different licenses available to use F5 Advanced WAF, such as BT, ASM, and LPM."

"After buying the program, you just pay for the support every year."

"F5 Advanced WAF technical support comes at a cost, and it's expensive."

"F5 Advanced WAF is not a cost-effective solution. Although they are attempting to reduce prices with their VE and cloud options, they are more expensive than other solutions. The solution is more expensive on average."

"The solution is very expensive so should only be used in the right environment."

"F5 bundles up services and the bundle is what you pay for rather than individual components."

"I would rate the pricing as seven out of ten"

More F5 Advanced WAF pricing and cost advice

"The product is cheaper compared to other solutions."

"Be careful about the options because to have all the features can be very expensive."

"When I modeled it out, we are spending somewhere between $600 to $800 a month with Verizon EdgeCast."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

20%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	31

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 Advanced WAF?

F5 Advanced WAF is somewhat costly compared to other vendors, but it is worth the investment due to the stability it provides to the environment and infrastructure.

What needs improvement with F5 Advanced WAF?

What is your primary use case for F5 Advanced WAF?

My main use case for F5 Advanced WAF is to protect external and internal applications from cyber attacks and to prevent malicious payloads and malicious data from reaching servers. Even if maliciou...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Edgio Global CDN?

I wasn't a part of the pricing, setup cost, and licensing discussions, but from what I heard from my colleagues, they said it was really good and it was fair, so they went with that.

What needs improvement with Edgio Global CDN?

To improve Uplynk, it should be made more user-friendly, as it takes a lot of moving pieces to make it work. Uplynk is very complex software with many moving pieces. If you're a big company, Uplynk...

What is your primary use case for Edgio Global CDN?

My main use case for Uplynk is live channels around the clock. Since we're in the television business, we're constantly showcasing shows, and it's a continuous operation.

Fortinet FortiWeb vs F5 Advanced WAF

Comparisons

Compared 14% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 4% of the time

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 4% of the time

Radware Alteon vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 4% of the time

More F5 Advanced WAF Competitors

Akamai vs Uplynk

Compared 9% of the time

Qwilt vs Uplynk

Compared 7% of the time

Cloudflare vs Uplynk

Compared 6% of the time

Windows Azure CDN vs Uplynk

Compared 5% of the time

Fastly vs Uplynk

Compared 5% of the time

More Uplynk Competitors

Product Reports

Download F5 Advanced WAF product report

F5 Advanced WAF

October 2026

Download Uplynk product report

September 2026

Also Known As

No data available

Edgio, Limelight Content Delivery, Limelight Orchestrate Delivery, Limelight Origin Storage, Global CDN, Verizon EdgeCast

Overview

F5 Advanced WAF delivers robust web security with features like signature-based threat protection and behavior analysis, ensuring app stability and security.

F5 Advanced WAF integrates advanced security with functionalities such as SQL injection defense and real-time threat intelligence. It enhances security for applications with load balancing, bot detection, and DDoS protection alongside comprehensive attack monitoring capabilities. Popular among diverse sectors, its usability and easy integration make it a practical choice by providing a stable security infrastructure across both on-premises and cloud environments.

What are the key features?

Signature-Based Protection: Defends against SQL injections and other cyber threats with up-to-date signature detections.
Behavior Analysis: Reduces false positives by monitoring patterns and behaviors.
Load Balancing: Ensures application stability and optimal performance.
Bot Detection: Identifies and mitigates bot traffic to secure applications.
DDoS Protection: Guards against distributed denial of service attacks, maintaining service availability.
Real-time Threat Intelligence: Offers live updates and insights into potential security threats.

What benefits and ROI can organizations expect?

Enhanced Security: Comprehensive protection against an array of web-based threats.
Improved Performance: Raises application availability and user experience.
Deployment Flexibility: Supports diverse environments, from on-premises to cloud settings.
Ease of Integration: Simple incorporation into existing security frameworks.

Particularly relevant in banking and financial services, F5 Advanced WAF safeguards applications from threats like SQL injections and DDoS attacks, ensuring compliance and API security. Its capabilities are leveraged for both load balancing and application defense, offering a versatile deployment model suited for protecting critical infrastructure in competitive and demanding industries.

Uplynk is a robust platform providing CDN integration and optimized streaming services, improving user experience and application performance. It offers control over CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations, supporting seamless asset management and mobile security.

Uplynk enhances application performance through efficient API calls, optimized web server loads, and robust CDN configurations. It ensures high availability and performance by leveraging Verizon EdgeCast CDN, crucial for managing high-volume traffic on e-commerce platforms. Though Uplynk excels in asset caching and mobile security with JWT tokens and AES encryption, some users note its global reach needs improvement, and its interface lacks modern user-friendliness. Deployment of new rules can be slower compared to competitors, while documentation and rate limiting features require enhancement. Despite this, Uplynk remains a preferred choice for organizations seeking streamlined web server load optimization and enhanced application performance.

What are Uplynk's key features?

Rules Engine V4: Manages CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with Verizon's existing offerings.
Efficient API Calls: Enhances streaming and application performance.
Staging Support: Testing in staging environments without impacting production.
Mobile Security: Includes JWT tokens and AES encryption.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Load Times: Efficient CDN configurations enhance site speed.
Enhanced User Navigation: Optimized performance for high-volume traffic.
DDoS Protection: Layer 3, 4, and 7 protection for comprehensive security.
Performance Optimization: Mobile development and streamlined caching.

Organizations deploy Uplynk to optimize web server load, enhance streaming service performance and support high-traffic volume management, especially in e-commerce. Its security measures, combined with Verizon EdgeCast CDN, ensure high availability and reliable performance, enhancing mobile engagement through specialized frameworks.

Sample Customers

MAXIMUS, Vivo, American Systems, Bangladesh Post Office, City Bank

TD Ameritrade, Plus500, Solvay Bank, Yahoo, Deckers Brands, and Coach