IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

F5 Advanced WAF vs Radware AppWall comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
F5 Logo
9,010 views|7,081 comparisons
Radware Logo
1,756 views|1,347 comparisons
Featured Review
Buyer's Guide
F5 Advanced WAF vs. Radware AppWall
May 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about F5 Advanced WAF vs. Radware AppWall and other solutions. Updated: May 2022.
607,332 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Identification, ease of use, and ease of modifying it to most of our needs are valuable.""The most valuable features of F5 Advanced WAF are the easy identification of events and customization. We can pinpoint our settings.""F5 Advanced WAF is a stable solution, we are satisfied. It is more stable than ForiWeb.""Feature-wise, they are always cutting edge and up-to-date. Many features aren't available via competitors. There's always a lot of enhanced critical features that just aren't available through anyone else, or, if they are, are too lightweight.""We can monitor IP locations, but we have constraints from each country. It has a replication feature. Licenses can be shared, taking turns with each license.""I like all of the features, but the main one is the attack signatures.""The most valuable features of F5 Advanced WAF are SSL uploading, signature, and anomaly detection. It is overall a high-quality solution.""It's scalable and very easy to manage."

More F5 Advanced WAF Pros →

"A user-friendly and reasonably priced solution.""The product offers high availability."

More Radware AppWall Pros →

Cons
"There should be more ability to rate limit certain scenarios. The majority of the time, it is either on or off. For certain types of use cases, there should be the ability to rate limit, not just enable or disable.""The interface is old-looking, it's not modern, which is why it's not always comfortable to use.""F5 Advanced WAF could improve on its funding for WAF features. There is a need to be more advanced WAF features.""The solution could improve by having an independent capture module. It has a built feature that you can deploy the capture on your published website. However, it's not very user-friendly. When you compare this feature to Google Capture or other enterprise captures, they are very simple. It needs a good connection to the F5 Advanced WAF sandbox. When you implement this feature in the data center, you may suffer some complications with connecting to the F5 Advanced WAF sandbox. This should be improved in the future.""We usually use a third-party tool for logging and reporting. It would be nice if we could do that right on this solution. They have one, but it's not very stable. Logging and reporting effectively would be a big enhancement.""I would like to see a better interface and better documentation compatibility with other products. It's more complicated with OWASP.""F5 Advanced WAF could improve the precision of the scanning. There are many false positives. They should improve their threat database.""The pricing could be more flexible."

More F5 Advanced WAF Cons →

"Scalability should be based on customer requirements.""You need to have pretty good internal knowledge of the solution."

More Radware AppWall Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's more expensive than other solutions and depending on the modules, there can be additional fees."
  • "F5 bundles up services and the bundle is what you pay for rather than individual components."
  • "Its price is fair. We have done a couple of deals where they were able to give some kind of discount to the customers. The price was initially high for the customers, but after a couple of negotiations, it came within their budget. They were happy with that."
  • "There are various plans available for Fortinet FortiWeb Cloud WAF as a Service, including a trial version."
  • "It is expensive. Its price should be better. Its licensing is on a yearly basis. Its licensing is also based on the model. There are no additional costs."
  • "I don't have any issue with the pricing of this solution."
  • "There is an annual subscription for this solution."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable when compared with other products, such as FortiWeb. I am very satisfied with the price."
  • More F5 Advanced WAF Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    607,332 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:My favorite feature of F5 is the ability to play around with the ciphers. I also like the ability to have an immediate display of the support IDs when a real blockage occurs. The protection offered is… more »
    Top Answer:As far as the pricing of F5 Advanced WAF I would rate it a four out of five depending on what features I am looking for. Imperva is more expensive. The price has remained consistent at a constant… more »
    Top Answer:The reporting portion of F5 Advance WAF is not great. They need to work out something better, as it is very basic. You only see the top IPs, I think there is more they can offer.
    Top Answer:A user-friendly and reasonably priced solution.
    Top Answer:Licensing cost depends on customer requirements. The on-prem solution requires a license plus warranty. The cloud version is subscription-based license. I think AppWall is cheaper relative to its… more »
    Top Answer:I'd like to see something more provided in terms of scalability because there's a limit on the throughput and it would help if scalability could be based on customer requirements.
    Ranking
    Views
    9,010
    Comparisons
    7,081
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    569
    Rating
    8.1
    Views
    1,756
    Comparisons
    1,347
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    619
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    F5's Advanced WAF is built on proven F5 technology and goes beyond reactive security such as static signatures and reputation to proactively detect and mitigate bots, secure credentials and sensitive data, and defend against application denial-of-service (DoS). Advanced WAF redefines application security to address the most prevalent threats organizations face today.

    Advanced WAF is offered as an appliance, virtual edition, and as a managed service—providing automated WAF services that meet complex deployment and management requirements while protecting your apps with great precision. It is the most effective solution for guarding modern applications and data from existing and emerging threats while maintaining compliance with key regulatory mandates.

    Advanced WAF redefines application security to address the most prevalent threats organizations face today:

    •Web attacks that steal credentials and gain unauthorized access across user accounts.
    •Application layer attacks that evade static security based on reputation and manual signatures.
    •New attack surfaces and threats due to the rapid adoption of APIs.
    •OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities

    AppWall is a WAF that ensures fast, reliable and secure delivery of mission-critical web applications and APIs regardless of the environment they’re deployed (private or public). AppWall is an NSS recommended, ICSA Labs certified and PCI compliant WAF that combines positive and negative security models to provide complete protection against web application attacks, access violations, attacks disguised behind CDNs, API manipulations, advanced HTTP-based assaults, brute force attacks on login pages, and more.

    Offer
    Learn more about F5 Advanced WAF
    Learn more about Radware AppWall
    Sample Customers
    MAXIMUS, Vivo, American Systems, Bangladesh Post Office, City Bank
    Accuview.com, Ace, ADP, BuyPass, Computershare, DTCC, Firehost, Garanti, HP, Konami, Mohawk, SeatPG, Telenet
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm40%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Non Tech Company10%
    Media Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Comms Service Provider23%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Government6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Comms Service Provider21%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise60%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business57%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    F5 Advanced WAF vs. Radware AppWall
    May 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about F5 Advanced WAF vs. Radware AppWall and other solutions. Updated: May 2022.
    607,332 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    F5 Advanced WAF is ranked 6th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 22 reviews while Radware AppWall is ranked 19th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 2 reviews. F5 Advanced WAF is rated 8.2, while Radware AppWall is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of F5 Advanced WAF writes "It is very stable as as a load balancer or a web application firewall". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware AppWall writes "Stable with high availability and good dashboards". F5 Advanced WAF is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Imperva Web Application Firewall, NGINX App Protect and Cloudflare, whereas Radware AppWall is most compared with AWS WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Fortinet FortiWeb and Akamai Kona Site Defender. See our F5 Advanced WAF vs. Radware AppWall report.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.