We performed a comparison between F-Secure Total and Vade for M365 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about TitanHQ, Proofpoint, Sophos and others in Office 365 Protection."The product is not resource-intensive."
"I would say that 90% of the spam and phishing attack emails get blocked right off the bat."
"The technical support is good and quick to resolve issues."
"The benefit that stands out to me is the ability for multiple individuals to collaborate simultaneously within the same document. Additionally, there is the option to save the document directly in the integrated OneDrive or SharePoint."
"Microsoft Defender for Office 365's most valuable feature is its performance."
"Microsoft Defender for Office 365's most valuable features are safe attachments and safe links."
"It also gives me good visibility because, with Defender, I'm using a Microsoft product to defend Microsoft products. The integration was really seamless and I have wide visibility because it picks up almost everything. Literally, I can see almost every activity that happens, from the e-mail to the workstation itself."
"Safe attachments, safe links, policies, and the ability to protect from zero-day threats are the most valuable features."
"It's a good product for us. The reports and notifications are very good for us."
"It is a stable solution...My company has no worries about the deployment phase of Vade for Office 365."
"Microsoft should provide more documentation for users so they can self-educate. I would like to see more documentation for advanced security features."
"The only thing they should improve is the licensing model. They should stop changing it. A year ago, the five features I mentioned were included in one product. Now, three of them are bundled into one product, and you have to pay extra for the other two. I don't mind paying extra, but I don't want them to change it every year or every six months. I need to know what I'm looking at and not worry about it next year."
"We are always looking for others tools to increase automation on tasks. There can be better integration with other solutions, such as PowerPoint and email."
"Several simulation options are available within 365, and the phishing simulation could be better."
"In some situations, it has not been able to pick impersonated emails having no attachments. Technical support definitely has a scope for improvement."
"This product's effectiveness could be improved, in terms of detecting unwanted spam or even malware between the emails, compared to other products."
"The phishing and spam filters could use some improvement."
"The custom alerts have to improve a lot."
"I would like to see in the future is EDR protection and a lower price for F-Secure Total."
"Concerning a bank, data can be confidential, and when a bank needs to transfer such data, it has to be specific to a certain level of conformity, which I did not see in the product."
More Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Pricing and Cost Advice →
F-Secure Total is ranked 7th in Office 365 Protection with 1 review while Vade for M365 is ranked 8th in Office 365 Protection with 1 review. F-Secure Total is rated 9.0, while Vade for M365 is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of F-Secure Total writes "Easy to setup and stable solution ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Vade for M365 writes "A stable tool capable of detecting malware while focusing on anti-phishing to protect its users". F-Secure Total is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, ZoneAlarm, WithSecure Elements Collaboration Protection and ESET PROTECT Enterprise, whereas Vade for M365 is most compared with Fortinet FortiMail, Hornetsecurity Hornet.email, Avanan, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) and Mailinblack.
See our list of best Office 365 Protection vendors and best Email Security vendors.
We monitor all Office 365 Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.