ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs Lumu comparison

ExtraHop Networks and Lumu Technologies are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. ExtraHop Networks is ranked #24, while Lumu Technologies is ranked #10 with an average rating of 9.0. Additionally, 100% of ExtraHop Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Lumu Technologies users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 and Lumu compete in the network security category. Lumu appears to have the upper hand in features due to its comprehensive threat intelligence, whereas ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 holds pricing and support advantages.

Features: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is known for advanced analytics, real-time network traffic visibility, and thorough threat detection. Lumu offers proactive threat analysis, effective threat intelligence, and is user-friendly in its operation. ExtraHop also extends its focus to performance monitoring, distinguishing it from Lumu's emphasis on threat intelligence.

Room for Improvement: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 needs enhanced integration capabilities, better customization, and greater adaptability to different networks. Lumu users desire better scalability, additional detailed threat context, and enhanced adaptability to varying environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is straightforward to deploy but has mixed reviews on customer service responsiveness. Lumu's deployment is fast and intuitive, with high marks in customer support, showing a considerable advantage in user satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is cost-effective with a solid ROI. Lumu, despite higher initial setup costs, is seen as providing greater long-term value due to its advanced threat detection, justifying the expense for many users.

To learn more, read our detailed ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Lumu Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Lumu

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,264 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Maksym Toporkov

Head of Research And Development at Quipu GmbH

A competitive choice for network detection and response with exceptional user interface, ease of implementation and minimal false positives

The NDR feature analyzes network traffic, creating records with connection details. While these records offer insights, there's a limitation in investigating payloads directly. ExtraHop provides an option for an additional server to save payloads, but its temporary storage has constraints. Unlike some competitors, it lacks an automatic payload-saving feature for each detection, presenting an improvement opportunity. Suggested enhancement involves the main sensor prompting payload storage for specific detections, streamlining the investigation process, and contributing to a more efficient workflow. A drawback includes packet storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations.

Read full review

Jeremiah Johnson

Director, Information Technology at a educational organization with 201-500 employees

Constant monitoring and analysis boosts network security

There is always room for improvement. I am not giving it a perfect score because I am sure there is something that could be enhanced.Having some sort of certification or training, along with more periodic webinars might be helpful. Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares. As the community grows for Lumu then that will improve, but that is not really a criticism of Lumu, they simply have not been around that long.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are incident creation, policy-based protection, IP whitelisting, and device encryption. These are beneficial for endpoint and server security."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks saves time in various ways, although the user interface is fairly standard."

"It's very stable. I've never experienced downtime for the ASM console or ASM core."

"I like that the product has behavior-based detection which offers many benefits over signature-based detection."

"Monitoring is most valuable."

"It's a perfect solution. It integrates well into the environment."

"The ability to kind of stitch everything together and see the actual complete picture is very useful. I guess you'd call it a playbook. Some people call it the forensics analysis of what was happening on particular endpoints when they detected some malicious behavior, and what transpired before that to cause that. It is also very user friendly. The way they have done everything and integrated all the solutions that they've purchased over the years to make it a very seamless, effective product is very good. One thing about Palo Alto is that they take the products or services that they purchase and make them seamless for the end user as compared to some companies that purchase other companies and then just kind of have their products off to the side or keep different interfaces. Palo Alto doesn't do that."

"On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks a nine."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"It is very easy to collect and handle data in ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud. Integration with Big Data is also easy. Many of our customers integrate it with Big Data platforms like Splunk or Elastic. It is also easy to handle and easy to understand."

"It is scalable."

"Their technical support is more effective and of better quality than other competitors."

"It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for network security and management."

"Lumu has allowed us to operate cybersecurity in a better way, with a manageable number of incidents that contain all the context including the Mitre matrix and much more, while providing visibility across on-premise, cloud, remote environments, and IoT such as IP cameras, with automatic mitigation that lets our team focus only on incidents that require our full attention."

"I like Lumu's simple user interface. When we deployed it, we got full access, allowing us to identify IP addresses on the network and connect machine names to users. It helped us identify and block threats via the firewall. I also appreciate the chat support and ticket closure process. We're currently reviewing network detection solutions, and my recommendations include Lumu, Sentinel, and a few others. Regarding functionality and user-friendliness, I would recommend Lumu over the others."

"With this solution, you don’t need to invest in expensive cybersecurity software because you can operate within the product easily."

"You can access external links, playbooks, MITRE Matrix, and a lot of information."

"Most of it is automated, so I do not have to watch it to get alerts."

"The tool's support team helps partners resolve any problems with the product."

"The context provided by the tool is very complete, it includes the miter matrix, playbooks, links, hashes, and much more."

"The automated response to incidents works effectively out of the box, and the number of interfaces and platforms it can work with is impressive."

More Lumu pros

Cons

"The downside to the solution is that there are a large number of false positives."

"The solution eats memory of the computer, unlike anything I've ever seen."

"It is not very strong in terms of endpoint management. It should have additional features like DLP, encryption, or advanced device control. Currently, Cortex is good in terms of the security of the endpoints, but it is not as good as other vendors in terms of the management of the endpoint."

"I would like to see better protection, specifically to protect email applications."

"There are some false positives."

"Currently, we are monitoring all USB drives and ports but we would like to improve our device control capabilities."

"This is a very costly product."

"Whenever the tool releases a new version when deploying the product across the organization, I feel like there are some disturbances in the CPU usage after upgrading the tool to the latest version."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"They can include integration with SAP. Currently, no vendor provides network performance monitoring in the SAP market. It is a very big market. We have around 400 customers for SAP in Korea. In the USA, there are more than 10,000 customers."

"A drawback includes bucket storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations."

"Their professional service can be improved."

"There needs to be more support."

"Nothing so far needs to be improved."

"Lumu's ability to discover threats is an area of concern where improvements are needed."

"Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares."

"It would be good if we could access the physical logs."

"The reports need improvement."

"I am happy with the current features. However, one important one is to improve the reports."

"The integration with different vendors and endpoints could be improved."

"I am happy with the current features. However, one important one is to improve the reports."

More Lumu cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay about $50,000 USD per year for a bundle that includes Cortex XDR."

"It has a yearly renewal."

"The price was fine."

"The price is on the higher side, but it's okay."

"The price of the product is not very economical."

"When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward."

"The solution is expensive. It's pricing is on a yearly-basis."

"This is an expensive solution."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"When compared to other solutions, it aligns with the market average, indicating a competitive pricing level."

"It is the cheapest solution we found."

"Compared to Lumu, other solutions are more expensive. SentinelOne was a bit cheaper, and another provider's price structure is unclear, but Lumu fit our budget nicely. SentinelOne's cost depends on the number of devices, and it might be similar to Lumu's, depending on deployment."

"The tool is available at a good price. The tool offers a good and competitive price for customers."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Insurance Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	47

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Lumu?

Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lumu?

There is always room for improvement. I am not giving it a perfect score because I am sure there is something that co...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lumu?

We use it as our managed SOC instead of contracting with an MSP. It coordinates endpoint and gives us a single pane o...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Vectra AI vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 11% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 8% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 8% of the time

NetWitness NDR vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco XDR vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 4% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Competitors

Darktrace vs Lumu

Compared 20% of the time

Wazuh vs Lumu

Compared 9% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs Lumu

Compared 9% of the time

TrendAI Vision One vs Lumu

Compared 6% of the time

Vectra AI vs Lumu

Compared 4% of the time

More Lumu Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

March 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

February 2026

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 product report

Buyer's Guide

Lumu

March 2026

Download Lumu product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud, Reveal(X) Cloud

No data available

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Cloud is where your business operates, where it innovates, how it enables employees, and how it connects with customers. Adversaries know this, and that's why attacks against cloud assets in IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS environments are increasing. With Reveal(x) 360, you can mitigate the blast radius of advanced threats like ransomware and supply chain attacks with unified security across multicloud and hybrid environments in a single management pane.

ExtraHop Networks

Lumu Technologies is a cyber-security company that illuminates threats, attacks, and adversaries affecting enterprises worldwide. Using actionable intelligence, Lumu provides a radical way to secure networks by enhancing and augmenting existing defense capabilities established over the past 25 years.

Lumu Technologies

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Wizards of the Coast

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Lumu

March 2026

Free Report: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Lumu

Find out what your peers are saying about ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Lumu and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Lumu report.

See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors and best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.