We performed a comparison between Everest Blueriq and ProcessMaker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."
"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."
"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."
"The platform's initial setup process could be better."
"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."
"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."
Earn 20 points
Everest Blueriq is ranked 33rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while ProcessMaker is ranked 37th in Business Process Management (BPM). Everest Blueriq is rated 8.0, while ProcessMaker is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Everest Blueriq writes "Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". Everest Blueriq is most compared with Pega BPM, whereas ProcessMaker is most compared with Camunda, Apache Airflow, Bonita and Appian.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
