ESET Endpoint Encryption vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention comparison

"The setup is getting easier."

"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The solution's UI is user-friendly. Even a non-technical person can use it."

"This solution can be centrally managed."

"ESET Endpoint Encryption works as an antivirus system."

"It is very secure and we have finally decided to use this after a thorough check. The interface is easy to navigate."

"I have used it in the past because it works quite well for encryption."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The stability of the solution can be good. However, the configuration takes a long time for it to be done properly."

"The whitelisting works well."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is a very stable product."

"What I like about McAfee Total Protection is that it's working. I also like that it doesn't require any specific knowledge to set up."

"The most valuable features of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention are the DLP. The DLP, data loss prevention is the most important feature right now that users are looking for."

"This solution has a rich set of policies."

"The solution is very user-friendly and valuable."

"It can scale."

"My problem is that there's a technical glitch and they don't have a fix for it. It's not working with the latest version of Windows, which is a problem."

"There could be an option for users to restart the system without a password."

"There should be more frequent updates."

"The solution should have better synchronization with active directory users and passwords for use in the encryption."

"ESET Endpoint Encryption needs to improve pricing and security."

"Integration with central management needs improvement."

"The product should be more responsive regarding feedback if it detects something in our infrastructure. I believe there's a backend that their engineers use to detect viruses in our system. We would appreciate it if they could promptly provide feedback and give us recommendations on how to better protect our infrastructure beyond their system. Additionally, we hope for improved integration with the other systems we currently use. It would be beneficial if they could collaborate to create something that facilitates integration between these systems."

"The overall compatibility of the device is an area where the solution lacks."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention needs to improve the resources it uses for CPU and RAM."

"Our client is not very happy with the lack of support, the skills, and the effectiveness of the tool."

"The UI needs to be simplified."

"I would like the solution to improve the AI features for anti-virus detection. I also want the software to include a tool for malware detection."

"We need to do a lot of configuration."

"The interface can be improved, it's too cluttered."

"It could improve how it deals with solar data."

"We faced many issues with the solution's customer support, and it should be made customer-friendly and more responsive."

"Instead of installing ESET on each machine at each location, we just do it remotely. This has been a time saver for us."

"The pricing is mid-ranged and could be more cost-effective."

"Licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"There are some inexpensive products compared to ESET Endpoint Encryption, but they lack the essential features."

"It is neither very expensive, nor cheap. Overall it is affordable and there is a long term arrangement between our company and the solution providers for license."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the highest, I rate its pricing a two."

"The National University System dedicates 500 of their 5000 licenses to us, which is $14/yr per device. Most companies are paying $99 or $120 per device a year."

"ESET Endpoint Encryption is moderately priced."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is an expensive solution."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive."

"I'm paying the license for McAfee Total Protection yearly. It could be cheaper, but it's fine."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"The price of the solution could improve."

"It's not a cheap option."

"The price of the solution could improve, it is expensive. We typically sell one and three-year licenses."

"There is an annual license to use this solution."