ESET Endpoint Encryption vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention comparison

"The product is easy to implement and configure."

"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable feature of ESET Endpoint Encryption is its rate of capturing viruses and malware."

"It is very secure and we have finally decided to use this after a thorough check. The interface is easy to navigate."

"The Remote Administrator is the most valuable feature that ESET offers for us. Centralized management of our ESET environment is what I like about the Remote Administrator."

"The tool does not slow down the computer."

"The most valuable feature of ESET Endpoint Encryption is the high level of encryption protection."

"The solution allows me to easily monitor the encryption and password management of multiple computers in my network and gives me visibility into user use."

"McAfee is a great choice for most cases."

"The solution is very user-friendly and valuable."

"The pricing of the product is excellent. It's very affordable."

"You can manage your compliance in line with legislation such as GDPR and POPIA."

"The most valuable features of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention are the DLP. The DLP, data loss prevention is the most important feature right now that users are looking for."

"I would recommend the solution to others."

"The whitelisting works well."

"It can scale."

"The product should be more responsive regarding feedback if it detects something in our infrastructure. I believe there's a backend that their engineers use to detect viruses in our system. We would appreciate it if they could promptly provide feedback and give us recommendations on how to better protect our infrastructure beyond their system. Additionally, we hope for improved integration with the other systems we currently use. It would be beneficial if they could collaborate to create something that facilitates integration between these systems."

"Sometimes the server console is very slow, so the performance could be improved."

"From an admin perspective, the solution's UI could be more user-friendly."

"I would like more robust reporting as part of the Remote Administrator."

"The solution should have better synchronization with active directory users and passwords for use in the encryption."

"I would like to see better compatibility with mobile devices."

"For me, it is unstable."

"ESET Endpoint Encryption needs to improve pricing and security."

"In my experience, it's not really user-friendly for me, in terms of how I navigate with the ePolicy Orchestrator."

"The licensing cost for McAfee Total Protection could be cheaper, but apart from that, I don't need anything else."

"When this solution is used it requires a lot of administration because the users can have difficulties using it and require assistance. The administrators are continuously modifying the policies for the users. Technical support will be used frequently."

"We have a shortage in integration capabilities with DRM solutions, such as Seclore, while it had been working before."

"McAfee needs to clarify its rules."

"The pricing is high for licensing and support and the GUI interface is good but could use updating."

"The user interface is messy and could be simplified."

"Technical support doesn't really offer fast response times."

"The National University System dedicates 500 of their 5000 licenses to us, which is $14/yr per device. Most companies are paying $99 or $120 per device a year."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the highest, I rate its pricing a two."

"The pricing is mid-ranged and could be more cost-effective."

"There are some inexpensive products compared to ESET Endpoint Encryption, but they lack the essential features."

"It is neither very expensive, nor cheap. Overall it is affordable and there is a long term arrangement between our company and the solution providers for license."

"ESET Endpoint Encryption is moderately priced."

"Licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"We paid for an annual subscription, and it was reasonable."

"The price of the solution could improve."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive."

"The pricing seems expensive both for the license and the support."

"There is an annual license to use this solution."

"The price of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive. It is not the most expensive solution but it is typically 15 to 20 percent higher than other solutions. There is no additional cost to using McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention."

"It's not a cheap option."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"The price of the solution could improve, it is expensive. We typically sell one and three-year licenses."