ESET Endpoint Encryption vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention comparison

"This solution can be centrally managed."

"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The Remote Administrator is the most valuable feature that ESET offers for us. Centralized management of our ESET environment is what I like about the Remote Administrator."

"The setup is getting easier."

"The most valuable feature is that everything is done on the server."

"It is very secure and we have finally decided to use this after a thorough check. The interface is easy to navigate."

"The tool does not slow down the computer."

"The product is easy to implement and configure."

"Offers some good protection features."

"Enables customization of file types and for different scenarios."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention works perfectly as a DLP solution; it is a matured and established solution that may have a shortage in applying AI, but it has good new approaches in data classification, built-in solution, and also re-architecture for the OCR solution inside the application."

"The tool focuses on endpoints rather than networks. Endpoints cover everything. It wouldn't be possible to steal confidential information from endpoints."

"The pricing of the product is excellent. It's very affordable."

"This solution has a rich set of policies."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is a very stable product."

"I am impressed with the tool's firewalls and web protection."

"The solution should have better synchronization with active directory users and passwords for use in the encryption."

"The overall compatibility of the device is an area where the solution lacks."

"Sometimes the server console is very slow, so the performance could be improved."

"There should be more frequent updates."

"ESET Endpoint Encryption needs to improve pricing and security."

"I would like more robust reporting as part of the Remote Administrator."

"The product should be more responsive regarding feedback if it detects something in our infrastructure. I believe there's a backend that their engineers use to detect viruses in our system. We would appreciate it if they could promptly provide feedback and give us recommendations on how to better protect our infrastructure beyond their system. Additionally, we hope for improved integration with the other systems we currently use. It would be beneficial if they could collaborate to create something that facilitates integration between these systems."

"If you have issues with your network, you can't get updates, which is a problem."

"The solution needs to be a one-stop protection shop. And yet, the DLP isn't strong. Anyone can break it quite easily."

"Lacks GDPR regulations to enhance security."

"The product uses a lot of resources and because of this it is not always a good solution for every situation."

"The interface can be improved, it's too cluttered."

"When this solution is used it requires a lot of administration because the users can have difficulties using it and require assistance. The administrators are continuously modifying the policies for the users. Technical support will be used frequently."

"The pricing is high for licensing and support and the GUI interface is good but could use updating."

"The product fails to offer automatic classification capabilities to its users."

"The user interface is messy and could be simplified."

"Licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"ESET Endpoint Encryption is moderately priced."

"We paid for an annual subscription, and it was reasonable."

"It is neither very expensive, nor cheap. Overall it is affordable and there is a long term arrangement between our company and the solution providers for license."

"Instead of installing ESET on each machine at each location, we just do it remotely. This has been a time saver for us."

"The National University System dedicates 500 of their 5000 licenses to us, which is $14/yr per device. Most companies are paying $99 or $120 per device a year."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the highest, I rate its pricing a two."

"The pricing is mid-ranged and could be more cost-effective."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is an expensive solution."

"If the client purchases the entire suite of McAfee Endpoint, the license is included."

"The price of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive. It is not the most expensive solution but it is typically 15 to 20 percent higher than other solutions. There is no additional cost to using McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"The pricing seems expensive both for the license and the support."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"The price of the solution could improve, it is expensive. We typically sell one and three-year licenses."