ESET Endpoint Encryption vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention comparison

"The most valuable feature of ESET Endpoint Encryption is the high level of encryption protection."

"I have used it in the past because it works quite well for encryption."

"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The setup is getting easier."

"The usability is the most valuable feature."

"The product is easy to implement and configure."

"It is very secure and we have finally decided to use this after a thorough check. The interface is easy to navigate."

"The Remote Administrator is the most valuable feature that ESET offers for us. Centralized management of our ESET environment is what I like about the Remote Administrator."

"The interface showcases threat incidents very well."

"The tool focuses on endpoints rather than networks. Endpoints cover everything. It wouldn't be possible to steal confidential information from endpoints."

"This solution has a rich set of policies."

"The whitelisting works well."

"The solution is very user-friendly and valuable."

"The initial setup process was easy."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to control access to USB drives and other external devices."

"The most valuable feature right now is the user control."

"Sometimes the server console is very slow, so the performance could be improved."

"There could be an option for users to restart the system without a password."

"I would like more robust reporting as part of the Remote Administrator."

"ESET Endpoint Encryption needs to improve pricing and security."

"The solution should have better synchronization with active directory users and passwords for use in the encryption."

"The product should be more responsive regarding feedback if it detects something in our infrastructure. I believe there's a backend that their engineers use to detect viruses in our system. We would appreciate it if they could promptly provide feedback and give us recommendations on how to better protect our infrastructure beyond their system. Additionally, we hope for improved integration with the other systems we currently use. It would be beneficial if they could collaborate to create something that facilitates integration between these systems."

"If you have issues with your network, you can't get updates, which is a problem."

"There should be more frequent updates."

"The UI needs to be simplified."

"Lacks GDPR regulations to enhance security."

"The solution needs to be a one-stop protection shop. And yet, the DLP isn't strong. Anyone can break it quite easily."

"The solution takes up too much CPU and memory."

"Our client is not very happy with the lack of support, the skills, and the effectiveness of the tool."

"It could improve how it deals with solar data."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention could improve by having artificial intelligence."

"The product uses a lot of resources and because of this it is not always a good solution for every situation."

"ESET Endpoint Encryption is moderately priced."

"We paid for an annual subscription, and it was reasonable."

"Instead of installing ESET on each machine at each location, we just do it remotely. This has been a time saver for us."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the highest, I rate its pricing a two."

"There are some inexpensive products compared to ESET Endpoint Encryption, but they lack the essential features."

"The National University System dedicates 500 of their 5000 licenses to us, which is $14/yr per device. Most companies are paying $99 or $120 per device a year."

"It is neither very expensive, nor cheap. Overall it is affordable and there is a long term arrangement between our company and the solution providers for license."

"Licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"The price of the solution could improve."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is an expensive solution."

"It's not a cheap option."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive."

"There is an annual license to use this solution."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"The pricing seems expensive both for the license and the support."