ESET Endpoint Encryption vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention comparison

"The most valuable feature is that everything is done on the server."

"The tool does not slow down the computer."

"The product is easy to implement and configure."

"The solution's UI is user-friendly. Even a non-technical person can use it."

"The most valuable feature of ESET Endpoint Encryption is its rate of capturing viruses and malware."

"ESET Endpoint Encryption works as an antivirus system."

"This solution can be centrally managed."

"The usability is the most valuable feature."

"The most valuable feature is strong data leak prevention for data protection."

"The tool focuses on endpoints rather than networks. Endpoints cover everything. It wouldn't be possible to steal confidential information from endpoints."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to control access to USB drives and other external devices."

"You can manage your compliance in line with legislation such as GDPR and POPIA."

"Everything in this DLP is great. It"

"The ability to block all USBs from the McAfee portal has been great."

"It can scale."

"Enables customization of file types and for different scenarios."

"I would like more robust reporting as part of the Remote Administrator."

"Integration with central management needs improvement."

"I would like to see better compatibility with mobile devices."

"The solution should have better synchronization with active directory users and passwords for use in the encryption."

"From an admin perspective, the solution's UI could be more user-friendly."

"ESET Endpoint Encryption needs to improve pricing and security."

"The initial setup could be made easier."

"The product should be more responsive regarding feedback if it detects something in our infrastructure. I believe there's a backend that their engineers use to detect viruses in our system. We would appreciate it if they could promptly provide feedback and give us recommendations on how to better protect our infrastructure beyond their system. Additionally, we hope for improved integration with the other systems we currently use. It would be beneficial if they could collaborate to create something that facilitates integration between these systems."

"There needs to be support for blocking the sending of files by email because even if you block or remove an external disk, the files are not protected."

"The initial setup is very complex."

"The pricing is high for licensing and support and the GUI interface is good but could use updating."

"Our client is not very happy with the lack of support, the skills, and the effectiveness of the tool."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention could improve by having artificial intelligence."

"The product fails to offer automatic classification capabilities to its users."

"Technical support doesn't really offer fast response times."

"It could improve how it deals with solar data."

"ESET Endpoint Encryption is moderately priced."

"It is neither very expensive, nor cheap. Overall it is affordable and there is a long term arrangement between our company and the solution providers for license."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the highest, I rate its pricing a two."

"The National University System dedicates 500 of their 5000 licenses to us, which is $14/yr per device. Most companies are paying $99 or $120 per device a year."

"Instead of installing ESET on each machine at each location, we just do it remotely. This has been a time saver for us."

"Licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"There are some inexpensive products compared to ESET Endpoint Encryption, but they lack the essential features."

"We paid for an annual subscription, and it was reasonable."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"It's not a cheap option."

"The price of the solution could improve."

"If the client purchases the entire suite of McAfee Endpoint, the license is included."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is an expensive solution."

"There is an annual license to use this solution."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."