SS&C Blue Prism vs erwin Data Modeler by Quest comparison

erwin by Quest and SS&C Technologies are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. erwin by Quest is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.1, while SS&C Technologies is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.7. erwin by Quest holds a 2.2% mindshare in BPD, compared to SS&C Technologies’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of erwin by Quest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of SS&C Technologies users who would recommend it.

erwin Data Modeler by Quest

Read 39 erwin Data Modeler by Quest reviews

1,858 Views
1,038 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

SS&C Blue Prism

Read 3 SS&C Blue Prism reviews

70 Views
44 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

erwin Data Modeler by Quest

SS&C Blue Prism

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Erwin Data Modeler by Quest and SS&C Blue Prism compete in data management and automation solutions. Erwin Data Modeler may have an edge for organizations focusing on data modeling due to its comprehensive capabilities, whereas Blue Prism holds the advantage for those prioritizing advanced automation features.

Features: Erwin Data Modeler by Quest offers data visualization, robust database management, and tools supporting complex data architecture for organizations prioritizing data structure. SS&C Blue Prism provides business process automation, ease of integration, and scalability, making it a strong choice for automation-focused businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Erwin Data Modeler offers a straightforward deployment process with dedicated customer support for data management professionals. SS&C Blue Prism has a more complex deployment process due to its sophisticated automation capabilities. However, it is supported by extensive documentation and training resources aimed at ensuring successful automation integration with customer service tailored to support these initiatives.

Pricing and ROI: Erwin Data Modeler is generally more cost-effective initially, delivering quick ROI for data-centric projects. SS&C Blue Prism, while having potentially higher initial setup costs, provides a longer-term ROI through its comprehensive automation solutions that may justify the investment for organizations centered on achieving streamlined business processes.

To learn more, read our detailed SS&C Blue Prism vs. erwin Data Modeler by Quest Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SS&C Blue Prism vs. erwin Data Modeler by Quest

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

erwin Data Modeler by Quest

Ranking in Business Process Design

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (3rd)

SS&C Blue Prism

Ranking in Business Process Design

21st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (34th), Process Automation (26th), Medical Insurance Claims Software (3rd), Insurance Claims Processing (5th), Document Management Software (15th), Low-Code Development Platforms (25th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (16th), Loan Management Software (2nd), Document Automation Software (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of erwin Data Modeler by Quest is 2.2%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SS&C Blue Prism is 0.2%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

JorgeSanz

Data Governance Senior Advisor at Abu Dhabi National Oil Company

Streamline data modeling and automate network changes for increased efficiency

The initial setup depends on the tool if you are using the data model environment. Stopping the server could be complex and require strong expertise. If you have everything set up and configured, Erwin is straightforward. You can deploy it in a few hours. In our case, it took a couple of months to address internal conditions, assign machines, and set up everything for the services. I rate the initial setup a six out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

Read full review

Gavin Beckett

Intelligent Automation Solution Architect at Digiblu

Design studio enables effective automation while licensing needs improvement

I noticed that it lacks the ability to automatically record the process steps like some of its competitors. Having this capability could accelerate the process. The delivery methodology felt somewhat waterfall in style and not sufficiently agile. Additionally, the licensing model was somewhat prohibitive. It was not developed in a consumption-based manner, however, rather in a fixed-price licensing model that did not account for volumes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides flexibility with the code. You can change the code as you want. Basically, you can change SQL based on what's best for your project."

"When you're getting down to the database level, where you're building a design and you're creating DDL out of it, or you're going in the other direction where you're reaching into system catalogs and bringing things back, that starts to really require specialization. Visio isn't going to reverse-engineer that for you. Those features in erwin are valuable."

"It has centralized storage so that a data model can be shared by different teams."

"Quest can create conceptual and physical data models to facilitate effective communication between business and IT. It can also integrate expertise from various engineering and database systems within your organization to enhance data management and administration."

"The ability to collaborate between different members across the organization is the most valuable feature. It gives us the ability to work on the same model, regardless of where we are physically."

"There is absolutely no problem with the stability."

"One of the best aspects of the tool is its reverse engineering capability."

"Forward engineering, DDL generation, reverse engineering, and reporting are the most valuable features of the solution."

More erwin Data Modeler by Quest pros

"Some important features include the language capabilities, which are crucial since RPA has to read the documents provided by the customer."

"I find the design studio, where I can build the automation, and the control room feature, which allows me to run and monitor the automation, to be the most useful."

"The key feature of SS&C that I find valuable is the general workflow visibility."

Cons

"The report generation has room for improvement. I think it was version 8 where you had to use Crystal Reports, and it was so painful that the company I was with just stayed on version 7 until version 9 came out and they restored the data browser. That's better than it was, but it's still a little cumbersome. For example, you run it in erwin, then export it out to Excel, and then you have to do a lot of cosmetic modification. If you discover that you missed a column, then you would have to rerun the whole thing. Sometimes what you would do is just go ahead and fix it in the report, then you have to remember to go back and fix it in the model. Therefore, I think the report generation still could use some work."

"Some Source official systems give us DDLs to work with and they have contents not required to be part of the DDL before we reverse engineer in the erwin DM. Therefore, we manually make changes to those scripts and edit them, then reverse-engineer within the tool. So, it does take some time to edit these DDL scripts generated by the source operational systems. What I would suggest: It would be helpful if there were a place within the erwin tool to import the file and automatically eliminate all the unnecessary lines of code, and just have the clean code built-in to generate the table/data model."

"The solution's model mark could be better because it crashes sometimes."

"The navigation is a little bit of a challenge. It's painful. For example, if you've got a view open and you want to try to move from side to side, the standard today is being able to drag and drop left and right. You can't really do that in the model. Moving around the model is painful because it doesn't follow the Windows model today."

"We are planning to move, in 2021, into their server version, where multiple data modelers can work at the same time and share their models. It has become a pain point to merge the models from individual desktops and get them into a single data model, when multiple data modelers are working on a particular project. It becomes a nightmare for the senior data modeler to bring them together, especially when it comes to recreating them when you want to merge them."

"I still use Visio for conceptual modeling, and that's mainly because it is easier to change things, and you can relax some of the rules. DM's eventual target is a database, which means you actually have to dot all the Is and cross all the Ts, but in a conceptual model, you don't often know what you're working with. So, that's probably a constraint with erwin. They have made it a lot easier, and they've done a lot, but there is probably still room for improvement in terms of the ease of presentation back to the business. I'm comparing it with something like Visio where you can change colors on a box, change the text color and that sort of stuff, and change the lines. Such things are a whole lot easier in Visio, but once you get a theme organized in erwin, you can apply that theme to all of the objects. So, it becomes easier, but you do have to set up that theme."

"The modeling product itself is far and above anything else that I've seen on the market. There are certain inconsistencies when it comes to keeping up with other platforms' databases in the reverse-engineering process. It should also support more database platforms."

"In terms of improvements, support could have been better in terms of installation, especially of workgroups. We struggled quite a bit to get it up and running. Collaboration could have been better from an installation perspective, but it is trivial as compared to what we use it for. Other than that, I don't have much feedback. It works pretty well, and the fact that we've been using it for more than a decade shows that it is quite solid."

More erwin Data Modeler by Quest cons

"Blue Prism is more costly than UiPath in terms of robotic licenses and orchestrators."

"I noticed that it lacks the ability to automatically record the process steps like some of its competitors."

"There is a need for improved integration with external systems in SS&C."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is either a one-year or three-year license. It is not a pay-as-you-go license like a SaaS solution. It’s more of a traditional licensing. They are a little bit on the pricier side."

"The price of erwin Data Modeler is very expensive, in particular for this part of the world."

"It is not a very expensive solution. Only the licensing and maintenance fee needs to be paid."

"An issue right now would be that erwin doesn't have a freely available browser (that I am aware of) for people who are not data modelers or data engineers that a consumer could use to look at the data models and play with it. This would not be to make any changes, but just to visually look at what exists. There are other products out there which do have end user browsers available and allow them to access data models via the data modeling tool."

"The tool is expensive."

"I wish it wasn't so expensive. I would love to personally buy a copy of my own and have it at home, because the next job that I'm looking at is probably project management and I might not have access to the tool. I would like to keep my ability to use the tool. Therefore, they should probably have a pricing for people like me who want to just use the solution as an independent consultant, trying to get started. $3,000 is a big hit."

"The pricing of the solution is cheap. I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"We've continued to use the product for many years and compared it with others on the market. The pricing is reasonable considering what the solution offers and what we pay. There are cheaper tools, but they may not be as robust and easy to use, so it's worth the money."

More erwin Data Modeler by Quest pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

17%

Insurance Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about erwin Data Modeler by Quest?

Forward engineering, DDL generation, reverse engineering, and reporting are the most valuable features of the solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for erwin Data Modeler by Quest?

The product is expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with erwin Data Modeler by Quest?

As a documenting tool, it's solid, though its reporting could be more robust. The reporting mechanisms could be more intuitive regarding report creation. It can generate reports in CSV files, displ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SS&C Blue Prism?

The pricing was not particularly competitive. It wasn't flexible for different geographies. For instance, in Africa, they didn't have a different pricing model to account for affordability. The pri...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SS&C Blue Prism?

There is a need for improved integration with external systems in SS&C. Currently, integration is limited to web services and K scripts for connecting to third-party systems, which I believe ca...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SS&C Blue Prism?

My primary use case for SS&C is managing migration projects. We are currently working on migrating from ViewStation's 3.5 version using K scripts to the new version in SS&C and rebuilding t...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP PowerDesigner vs erwin Data Modeler by Quest

Compared 31% of the time

IDERA ER/Studio vs erwin Data Modeler by Quest

Compared 19% of the time

Lucidchart vs erwin Data Modeler by Quest

Compared 14% of the time

Visio vs erwin Data Modeler by Quest

Compared 8% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs erwin Data Modeler by Quest

Compared 7% of the time

More erwin Data Modeler by Quest Competitors

Camunda vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 40% of the time

Appian vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 22% of the time

IBM BPM vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 19% of the time

FIS Commercial Lending Suite vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 19% of the time

More SS&C Blue Prism Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

erwin Data Modeler by Quest

April 2025

Download erwin Data Modeler by Quest product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

April 2025

Download SS&C Blue Prism product report

Also Known As

erwin DM

SS&C AWD

Overview

erwin pioneered data modeling, and erwin Data Modeler (erwin DM) remains trusted, award-winning software for data modeling and database design, automating complex and time-consuming tasks. Use it to discover and document any data from anywhere for consistency, clarity and artifact reuse across large-scale data integration, master data management, metadata management, Big Data, business intelligence and analytics initiatives – all while supporting data governance and intelligence efforts.

erwin by Quest

SS&C Blue Prism provides scalable, intelligent automation for dynamic business environments. Its technology enhances process efficiency and delivers significant operational benefits. Users leverage its capabilities in task automation and broader digital transformation strategies.

SS&C Blue Prism incorporates advanced robotic process automation aimed at optimizing workflows and enabling end-to-end automation. It allows businesses to automate repetitive tasks, integrate systems, and improve process accuracy. With a focus on enterprise-grade security and compliance, it helps organizations achieve digital transformation milestones while maintaining robust control frameworks.

What are the critical features of SS&C Blue Prism?

Robust Automation: Enables complex process automation with scalability.
Integration Capabilities: Easily connects with many systems and applications.
Security and Compliance: Ensures data protection and regulatory adherence.

What benefits or ROI should users seek in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Significant time savings and resource optimization.
Cost Reduction: Decreased operational costs through task automation.
Accuracy: Enhanced precision in process execution and data handling.

SS&C Blue Prism finds implementation across industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, where automation is harnessed to optimize high-volume transactional tasks. In finance, it automates reconciliation processes, while in healthcare, it aids in patient data management, showcasing its versatility.

SS&C Technologies

Sample Customers

Premera, America Honda Motors, Aetna, Kaiser Permanente, Dental Dental Cali, Cigna, Staples

AWS, EY, Deloitte, ABBYY, Microsoft, GLYNT.AI, Pfizer, Invesco, Western Union

Buyer's Guide

SS&C Blue Prism vs. erwin Data Modeler by Quest

April 2025

Free Report: SS&C Blue Prism vs. erwin Data Modeler by Quest

Find out what your peers are saying about SS&C Blue Prism vs. erwin Data Modeler by Quest and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SS&C Blue Prism vs. erwin Data Modeler by Quest report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.