Entuity vs Icinga comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Park Place Technologies and Icinga are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Park Place Technologies is ranked #68, while Icinga is ranked #44. Park Place Technologies holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to Icinga’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Park Place Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Icinga users who would recommend it.

Entuity

Read 11 Entuity reviews

3,427 Views
3,256 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Icinga

Read 17 Icinga reviews

7,834 Views
5,719 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Entuity

Icinga

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Entuity and Icinga are both network management solutions competing in enterprise IT infrastructure management. Entuity often has the upper hand for large enterprises due to its comprehensive feature set, while Icinga appeals to those needing customizable and open-source solutions.

Features: Entuity offers automated network discovery, detailed analytics, and intricate monitoring capabilities. Icinga provides strong integration with various tools, adaptability for multi-environment setups, and a flexible open-source architecture.

Room for Improvement: Entuity could enhance its adaptability and integration with third-party tools. Its interface might benefit from more customization options and scalability for smaller enterprises. Icinga could improve its initial deployment complexity, enhance its out-of-the-box monitoring capabilities, and offer more official support channels beyond the community-driven model.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Entuity presents a more straightforward deployment process with an all-inclusive design, supported by a centralized support model. Icinga requires more initial configuration due to its open-source nature, with support typically provided through community-driven channels.

Pricing and ROI: Entuity has a higher upfront cost, offering a complete enterprise solution with quick ROI through extensive features. Icinga offers a lower initial cost, appealing to budget-conscious users, but may incur additional expenses for implementation and maintenance. Entuity typically provides immediate ROI with less need for extensive customization, whereas Icinga's flexible model can deliver cost efficiency for skilled teams capable of customizing their deployment.

To learn more, read our detailed Entuity vs. Icinga Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Entuity vs. Icinga

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,383 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Entuity

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

68th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Icinga

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

44th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (17th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (50th), Cloud Monitoring Software (34th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Entuity is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Icinga is 1.1%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Icinga	1.1%
Entuity	0.6%
Other	98.3%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

A good solution for network monitoring and support management, but there is no centralized database

There is no centralized database. It is an issue if you use a local database and have multiple borders. However, if you have an external database, you can keep the same old data from an old border up to 100 borders. In addition, if we want to create an ABI or use an ABI to connect data, there is no competition when we ask for support. If we want to modify the calculation matrix or equation, we have to raise a professional service. Other competitors like Micro Focus, a network management system, have a new supportability matrix in the market every quarter.

Read full review

reviewer2292201

Innovation Service Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have but average multi-tenancy aspect

It's supported by the community. We use Icinga, which is not part of the Open-Source platform but is wrapped into a commercial solution from another provider, a local provider in Italy. Icinga is an open-source platform, so it is supported by the community. It's quite easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have. So it's not expensive, and it's quite a general purpose. We can easily monitor any kind of infrastructure we encounter. The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated. The alerting is the same as any other monitoring platform. It's not a "wow" feature that has changed our lives, but it's perfectly adequate.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup of Entuity is easy and the full process took approximately 30 minutes."

"My clients have received a good return on investment."

"I would encourage others to use Entuity, as it's powerful and user-friendly."

"We find the SurePath component of this solution to be very valuable, as it gives us the path to whatever we are configuring."

"We are able to receive a visualized monitoring of the network infrastructure which is very helpful."

"We went for this solution because it comes with a lot of features; it's an all-in-one solution, which means we don't have to go for multiple solutions."

"The most valuable feature is the ease of deployment, simplicity of the end user's experience (the forms and the sheets that you use, the screens you can use to see what's going on, and overall capability), as well as the ease of integration into other solutions."

"I particularly like the theme and the dashboard that they have brought in this version. In the previous version, there was only a simple screen. There wasn't any dashboard. It was a simple view, but now, they have brought in a dashboard that gives the fields for the ops as well. They can get the data they want to see in a single place."

More Entuity pros

"If you have a small infrastructure or a small number of devices that you want to monitor, then I think it's a good solution."

"This solution has a self-healing handler where if the service is down, it is automatically restarted."

"We have found the solution to be stable."

"I use it for monitoring infrastructure and it was very good for that issue."

"There's a module called Icinga Director, which helps us configure the product using an intuitive interface through clicks instead of creating a text configuration. It's very helpful for us."

"The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated."

"The apply rules feature saves a lot of time."

"Macros and the ability to connect it to Google Maps are valuable features."

More Icinga pros

Cons

"If we want to modify the calculation matrix or equation, we have to raise a professional service."

"Entuity currently has APIs, but they are not straightforward."

"We would like the backup element of this solution to be improved as, at present, it is very limited and does not have much scope for customization."

"In the most recent versions, Entuity has removed the Explorer navigation feature. This was very useful, and Entuity would be improved by restoring it."

"The configuration of the logging could be improved because if someone deleted any note or inventory, or some change to the inventory, we are not able to identify which user or which administrator modifies these details. For example, there should be read-only locks on maps to prevent their deletion. This way people can only read and cannot delete that particular map."

"A typical user might want to see even more depth to the standard reporting and ease of integration."

"Entuity can expand its coverage on monitoring VoIP solutions a little bit more."

"Entuity could improve by having more integration because now network management is not a standalone solution. You have to integrate it with your network, applications, and everything else. We have to collect that information from those solutions or relevant managers. Additionally, the SLA dashboard should be improved."

More Entuity cons

"Icinga’s automation could be improved."

"Network Discovery capabilities would be extremely helpful."

"Sometimes, it is very hard to keep an overview of what's happening."

"It is not really adequate for our current needs. It causes additional issues which we have to work around and takes us time that a better solution would not."

"Scalability is problematic. If you have a stable environment it's good, but if the environment is growing, I had some problems with Icinga."

"At this time, the layout of the website is a bit difficult. It should be more user-friendly for changing the background and logos."

"The installation and configuration are very complex."

"The solution lacks many features important to higher-level IT management and network support."

More Icinga cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have 400 licenses and we are only using 150 licenses."

"Entuity is not an expensive solution."

"It can be comparatively expensive but that is because it is comprehensive."

"Entuity's licensing is very highly-priced."

"It varies and depends on the quantity. It's worth the cost."

"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."

"The solution is free to use."

"The solution is cheap."

"This is an open-source solution with paid support."

"It's an open-source solution."

"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."

"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."

"We're using the free version of Icinga."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

14%

Comms Service Provider

13%

University

12%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs Entuity

Compared 18% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Entuity

Compared 12% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Entuity

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs Entuity

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer vs Entuity

Compared 4% of the time

More Entuity Competitors

Zabbix vs Icinga

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmk vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Icinga

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios Core vs Icinga

Compared 3% of the time

More Icinga Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Entuity

October 2026

Download Entuity product report

Buyer's Guide

Icinga

September 2026

Download Icinga product report

Also Known As

No data available

Icinga Cloud Monitoring

Overview

Entuity offers a user-friendly interface with network mapping and integration capabilities. It provides real-time connectivity diagrams and detailed device monitoring. Automated network discovery ensures accurate topology mapping, and its updated dashboard enhances data visibility.

Entuity's focus is on network device monitoring, catering to switches, routers, access points, and firewalls. It tracks health, status, CPU, memory, and performance metrics, allowing users to set thresholds for alerts and incidents. Integration with monitoring systems enables insights and reports on connectivity and network metrics, reducing noise through event management capabilities while managing configurations and performance inventory.

What are the standout features of Entuity?

Ease of Deployment: Quickly set up with minimal effort, making it accessible for users with different technical backgrounds.
Real-Time Network Mapping: Provides live connectivity diagrams to enhance network understanding and troubleshooting.
SurePath Monitoring: Offers detailed insights into network device performance for improved oversight.
Automated Discovery: Delivers precise topology mapping for efficient network management.
Customizable Dashboard: Facilitates comprehensive data visibility tailored to specific needs.
Event Management: Streamlines alert processes to prioritize critical issues effectively.
Google API-Based Topology: Integrates with Google APIs for advanced topology visualization.

What benefits do users receive from Entuity?

Enhanced Integration: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing tools to improve functionality.
User-Friendly Interface: Enables ease of navigation and efficient management, reducing training requirements.
Stability and Updates: Continuous updates provide stable performance and feature enhancements.
Technical Support: Access to comprehensive support that aids in resolving issues promptly.

Entuity is implemented extensively in industries requiring robust network management, including telecommunications and enterprises with distributed networks. It ensures consistent monitoring and operational efficiency across locations, helping organizations maintain optimal network performance and reliability.

Park Place Technologies

Icinga is a robust tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, known for its distributed monitoring capabilities and seamless integration with multiple platforms. It efficiently observes servers, network devices, and environments like Linux and Windows, enabling proactive issue identification and resource management.

With a focus on task delegation and clustering, Icinga offers an intuitive interface through its GUI and Icinga Director, simplifying configuration. The extensive plugin library supports diverse technologies, while the API allows automation with tools like Terraform and Ansible. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with data display in the GUI, a need for improved dashboards, and complex configuration processes. Users benefit from its SNMP alerts, email notifications, and automated incident handling, making it essential for managed service environments and enterprises.

What are the key features of Icinga?

Task Delegation: Streamlines monitoring tasks across distributed systems.
Event Handler: Enables automatic service recovery with minimal intervention.
Plugin Library: Offers extensive support for integrating diverse technologies.
API Accessibility: Facilitates automation with popular tools like Terraform.
Custom Plugins: Allows easy creation and personalization for monitoring needs.

What benefits should you consider in Icinga reviews?

Flexibility: Tailors monitoring to specific requirements with community support.
Scalability: Successfully manages growing infrastructure demands.
Proactivity: Enhances issue identification and resource allocation.
Integration: Seamlessly works with existing IT operations platforms.

Icinga is widely adopted in IT environments for monitoring servers, networks, and applications across industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology. Its ability to integrate with various operating systems and automation platforms makes it a versatile choice for industries prioritizing comprehensive surveillance and proactive management of their infrastructure.

Icinga

Sample Customers

Tait Communications, Vattenfall, Discovery, University of Minnesota, Pernod Ricard, Electric Car

Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre

Buyer's Guide

Entuity vs. Icinga

September 2026

Free Report: Entuity vs. Icinga

Find out what your peers are saying about Entuity vs. Icinga and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Entuity vs. Icinga report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.