• Home
  • ENEA Polyhedra vs. TigerLogic XDMS

ENEA Polyhedra vs TigerLogic XDMS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ENEA Logo

ENEA Polyhedra

59 views|39 comparisons
TigerLogic Logo

TigerLogic XDMS

26 views|11 comparisons
Ranking
15th
out of 19 in Non-Relational Databases
Views
59
Comparisons
39
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
18th
out of 19 in Non-Relational Databases
Views
26
Comparisons
11
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Polyhedra
Learn More
ENEA
TigerLogic
Video Not Available
Overview
Polyhedra is a family of compact, lightweight, SQL relational database management systems (RDBMS) optimized for embedded systems applications. Built on an ironclad clientserver architecture, Polyhedra in-memory database system (IMDB) and Polyhedra FlashLite provide a secure data repository for embedded systems, mobile devices and server-based applications demanding the utmost in performance and reliability.
TigerLogic XDMS is an enterprise native XML database management server with both data- and document-centric capabilities. The TigerLogic XDMS difference comes from its core technology: a data model that is optimal for managing and storing any kind of XML or non-XML data and its extensible XQuery Engine.
Sample Customers
Xilinx, Freescale Semiconductor, AMD
Arts Management Systems, Future Chalk Software, Tek Service Srl, Just Software bvba, Senex, Am_tiq AG, CNM, WigaSoft AG, 24 ore software, Abraxas Juris AG, TheDataManager, Catalina Software, The Conrad Company, ADJob Nordic AB, J+D Software, Enviro Data, The International Education and Training Corporation, 888 Software Products Srl, Instinct Systems

ENEA Polyhedra is ranked 15th in Non-Relational Databases while TigerLogic XDMS is ranked 18th in Non-Relational Databases. ENEA Polyhedra is rated 0.0, while TigerLogic XDMS is rated 0.0. On the other hand, ENEA Polyhedra is most compared with , whereas TigerLogic XDMS is most compared with .

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.