IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Adabas vs TigerLogic XDMS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Software AG Logo
106 views|67 comparisons
TigerLogic Logo
16 views|8 comparisons
Ranking
11th
Views
106
Comparisons
67
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
18th
Views
16
Comparisons
8
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
TigerLogic
Video Not Available
Overview

Database server for large and mission-critical business applications that require sub-second response times.

TigerLogic XDMS is an enterprise native XML database management server with both data- and document-centric capabilities. The TigerLogic XDMS difference comes from its core technology: a data model that is optimal for managing and storing any kind of XML or non-XML data and its extensible XQuery Engine.
Offer
Learn more about Adabas
Learn more about TigerLogic XDMS
Sample Customers
Public Authority of Civil Information (PACI), Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (EMM), Alliance Healthcare, Florida State College, Smals, Santander Consumer Bank Austria, Apollo-Optik
Arts Management Systems, Future Chalk Software, Tek Service Srl, Just Software bvba, Senex, Am_tiq AG, CNM, WigaSoft AG, 24 ore software, Abraxas Juris AG, TheDataManager, Catalina Software, The Conrad Company, ADJob Nordic AB, J+D Software, Enviro Data, The International Education and Training Corporation, 888 Software Products Srl, Instinct Systems

Adabas is ranked 11th in Non-Relational Databases while TigerLogic XDMS is ranked 18th in Non-Relational Databases. Adabas is rated 0.0, while TigerLogic XDMS is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Adabas is most compared with , whereas TigerLogic XDMS is most compared with .

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.