Enablon vs IRIS CARBON comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Wolters Kluwer Logo
242 views|163 comparisons
IRIS CARBON Logo
36 views|22 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Enablon and IRIS CARBON based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC.
To learn more, read our detailed GRC Report (Updated: February 2024).
755,469 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
32nd
out of 83 in GRC
Views
242
Comparisons
163
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
63rd
out of 83 in GRC
Views
36
Comparisons
22
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
GRC
February 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: February 2024.
755,469 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Enablon GRC Suite
Learn More
Overview

Enablon GRC solutions provide a consistent and all-encompassing approach to corporate governance, enterprise risk management, and compliance.

One Trusted Solution For Regulatory Reporting Around The World.
Trust IRIS CARBONĀ® to simplify and add value to digital reporting with a top-notch experience.

Sample Customers
Danone
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
GRC
February 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: February 2024.
755,469 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Enablon is ranked 32nd in GRC while IRIS CARBON is ranked 63rd in GRC. Enablon is rated 0.0, while IRIS CARBON is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Enablon is most compared with RSA Archer, whereas IRIS CARBON is most compared with Workiva Wdesk.

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.