We performed a comparison between ELMA 365 and IBM Case Foundation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."A lot of customers, when we introduce this kind of product into their organization, it provides a lot of analytics."
"It provides us the capability of producing business processes for documents that are launched immediately when a document comes into the repository."
"The content management is great."
"The most valuable feature is the content manager part of the file as it is very stable, robust, and reliable."
"Case Foundation provides a strong security boost."
"The solution is scalable."
"The most valuable feature is its stability, which is why we are using it."
"A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in analytics and reporting."
"Flexible and the ability to divide search screens, and to search for documents. The ECM feature inside the system is great."
"Customers want improved productivity."
"We are now using microservices but there are some areas where the coordination with FileNet is problematic."
"Once a workflow is launched then it stays static forever, which is a problem because if there is a change in the business then you cannot change the workflow."
"The place of improvement is merging or combining all of the workflow functionality into one seamless tool. Now, there are multiple installations that are different. Case Foundation, before you can put Case Manager and you've got IBM BPM, and the roadmap is there to merge them altogether. But that's the struggle at the moment, it's having multiple installations and disparate workflow applications."
"There are some features that could be enhanced like the document viewer"
"There is a need for more open and flexible integration capabilities, allowing seamless collaboration with a broader spectrum of business process management solutions, beyond the confines of IBM's document management offerings."
"Comparing the solution with other interfaces, IBM BPM is much better than Case Foundation. They need to make this solution's interface more user-friendly."
"90% of the feedback we receive states that the UI is not very user-friendly."
"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."
ELMA 365 is ranked 46th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 1 review while IBM Case Foundation is ranked 27th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. ELMA 365 is rated 0.0, while IBM Case Foundation is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of ELMA 365 writes "A great ERP for medium and even small businesses". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Case Foundation writes "Streamlined business process automation with user-friendly design". ELMA 365 is most compared with Bitrix24, Camunda and Bizagi, whereas IBM Case Foundation is most compared with IBM Business Automation Workflow.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
